Characterizing patient flow after an academic hospital merger and acquisition

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. e343-e348
2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 20-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Miin Alikhan ◽  
Robert J. Howard ◽  
Richard Bowry

A results-driven approach to optimizing patient flow, grounded on quality improvement, change management and organizational learning principles, is described. Tactics included collaborative governance, performance management, rapid process improvements and implementation toolkits. Results included an 83.1% decrease in emergent volumes waiting for greater than 24 hours and a 49.1% improvement in emergency department length of stay for admitted patients. There were no adverse outcomes on other key indicators. Sustainability remains the challenge but early results are encouraging.


2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 464-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Kraaijvanger ◽  
Douwe Rijpsma ◽  
Lian Roovers ◽  
Henk van Leeuwen ◽  
Karin Kaasjager ◽  
...  

ObjectiveEarly prediction of admission has the potential to reduce length of stay in the ED. The aim of this study is to create a computerised tool to predict admission probability.MethodsThe prediction rule was derived from data on all patients who visited the ED of the Rijnstate Hospital over two random weeks. Performing a multivariate logistic regression analysis factors associated with hospitalisation were explored. Using these data, a model was developed to predict admission probability. Prospective validation was performed at Rijnstate Hospital and in two regional hospitals with different baseline admission rates. The model was converted into a computerised tool that reported the admission probability for any patient at the time of triage.ResultsData from 1261 visits were included in the derivation of the rule. Four contributing factors for admission that could be determined at triage were identified: age, triage category, arrival mode and main symptom. Prospective validation showed that this model reliably predicts hospital admission in two community hospitals (area under the curve (AUC) 0.87, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.89) and in an academic hospital (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.80). In the community hospitals, using a cut-off of 80% for admission probability resulted in the highest number of true positives (actual admissions) with the greatest specificity (positive predictive value (PPV): 89.6, 95% CI 84.5 to 93.6; negative predictive value (NPV): 70.3, 95% CI 67.6 to 72.9). For the academic hospital, with a higher admission rate, a 90% probability was a better cut-off (PPV: 83.0, 95% CI 73.8 to 90.0; NPV: 59.3, 95% CI 54.2 to 64.2).ConclusionAdmission probability for ED patients can be calculated using a prediction tool. Further research must show whether using this tool can improve patient flow in the ED.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 208-222
Author(s):  
Vladimir Volodin ◽  
◽  
Anton Dmitriev ◽  
Vladimir Khabarov ◽  
◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gregory Dobson ◽  
Hsiao-Hui Lee ◽  
Edieal J. Pinker
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document