scholarly journals Chinese herbal medicine injections (CHMIs) for chronic pulmonary heart disease: protocol for a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Author(s):  
Yuping Lei ◽  
Meili Wang ◽  
Guiqiang Sun ◽  
Yong Liu ◽  
Yapei Yang ◽  
...  
Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. e24128
Author(s):  
Yuping Lei ◽  
Meili Wang ◽  
Guiqiang Sun ◽  
Yong Liu ◽  
Yapei Yang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuang Wang ◽  
◽  
Aidong Liu ◽  
Zhilei Wang ◽  
Yue Zhang

Review question / Objective: This study is the protocol for a systematic review to evaluate the Efficacy and safety of acupuncture combined with Chinese herbal medicine in the treatment of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of such combined therapy in the treatment of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease, It provides a reliable scientific basis for clinicians to use this approach to treat angina pectoris of coronary heart disease. Information sources: We conducted a systematic search for relevant documents in the Chinese and English databases, and the search time is limited to November 23, 2021. The following eight databases are included : PubMed,EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), Wanfang Database.Relevant journals were searched to trace the references included in the study. Other resources will be searched if necessary.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Yang Hu ◽  
Yangzihan Wang ◽  
Junqiao Chen ◽  
Trisha Greenhalgh ◽  
Jon Wardle

Abstract Background: To evaluate the evidence behind claims that Chinese Herbal Medicine, specifically “three medicines and three formulations” (3M3F, comprising Jinhua Qinggan, Lianhua Qingwen, Xuebijing, Qingfei Paidu, Huashi Baidu and Xuanfei Baidu), is an effective treatment for COVID-19. Methods: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE and CNKI databases, preprint servers, clinical trial registries and supplementary sources for Chinese- or English-language randomised trials or non-randomised studies with comparator groups, which tested the constituents of 3M3F in the treatment of COVID-19 up to September 2020. Primary outcome was change in disease severity. Secondary outcomes included various symptoms. Meta-analysis (using generic inverse variance random effects model) was performed when there were two or more studies reporting on the same symptom. Results: Of 607 articles identified, thirteen primary studies (six RCTs and seven retrospective non-randomised comparative studies) with 1467 participants met our final inclusion criteria. Studies were small and had significant methodological limitations, most notably potential bias in assessment of outcomes. No study convincingly demonstrated a statistically significant impact on change in disease severity. Eight studies reported sufficiently similar secondary outcomes to be included in a meta-analysis. Some statistically significant impacts on symptoms, chest CT manifestations, laboratory variables and length of stay were demonstrated, but such findings were sparse and many remain unreplicated.Conclusions: These findings neither support nor refute the claim that 3M3F alters the severity of COVID-19 or alleviates symptoms. More rigorous studies are required to properly ascertain the potential role of Chinese Herbal Medicine in COVID-19.Systematic review registration: This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020187502) prior to data collection and analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document