scholarly journals Which item measure the authentic leadership of the entry level leaders in military appropriately?

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-55
Author(s):  
Seongho Bae
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Precision Measurement ◽  
Authentic Leadership ◽  
Military Leader ◽  
High Precision Measurement ◽  
Factor Solution ◽  
High Stakes ◽  
Entry Level ◽  
Personnel Decisions ◽  
Authentic Leadership Questionnaire

The research trials of high precision measurement of authentic leadership is not active, and haven’t knowledge for reliability and coverage range of authentic leadership questionnaires when want to make high stakes personnel decisions in military settings. This study presented five questionnaires to measure authentic leadership appropriately based on military leader responded survey data. They were ALQ8, ALQ12, ALQ13, ALQ14, and ALQ16. In this study presented they could be discriminate leaders who low level of authentic leadership with reliability. Further tasks may discover and consider of bi-factor solution of factor structure of authentic leadership questionnaire, and flourish discussions how to use authentic leadership questionnaire to make decisions in context of military leader resource management.

High precision measurement of the SOS surface thickness in the rough phase

1991 ◽  
Vol 1 (12) ◽  
pp. 1669-1673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Gerd Evertz ◽  
Martin Hasenbusch ◽  
Mihail Marcu ◽  
Klaus Pinn ◽  
Sorin Solomon
Keyword(s):  
High Precision ◽  
Precision Measurement ◽  
High Precision Measurement ◽  
Surface Thickness

scholarly journals BATCH PROCESSING OF TREE-RING SAMPLES FOR RADIOCARBON ANALYSIS

Radiocarbon ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Alexandra Fogtmann-Schulz ◽  
Sabrina G K Kudsk ◽  
Florian Adolphi ◽  
Christoffer Karoff ◽  
Mads F Knudsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Precision ◽  
Tree Rings ◽  
Precision Measurement ◽  
Radiocarbon Dating ◽  
The Other ◽  
High Precision Measurement ◽  
Machine Performance ◽  
High Throughput Method ◽  
Ca 50 ◽  
Low Activity

ABSTRACT We here present a comparison of methods for the pretreatment of a batch of tree rings for high-precision measurement of radiocarbon at the Aarhus AMS Centre (AARAMS), Aarhus University, Denmark. The aim was to develop an efficient and high-throughput method able to pretreat ca. 50 samples at a time. We tested two methods for extracting α-cellulose from wood to find the most optimal for our use. One method used acetic acid, the other used HCl acid for the delignification. The testing was conducted on background 14C samples, in order to assess the effect of the different pretreatment methods on low-activity samples. Furthermore, the extracted wood and cellulose fractions were analyzed using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, which showed a successful extraction of α-cellulose from the samples. Cellulose samples were pretreated at AARAMS, and the graphitization and radiocarbon analysis of these samples were done at both AARAMS and the radiocarbon dating laboratory at Lund University to compare the graphitization and AMS machine performance. No significant offset was found between the two sets of measurements. Based on these tests, the pretreatment of tree rings for high-precision radiocarbon analysis at AARAMS will henceforth use HCI for the delignification.

Reliability Estimates for IRT-Based Forced-Choice Assessment Scores

2021 ◽  
pp. 109442812199908
Author(s):  
Yin Lin
Keyword(s):  
Impression Management ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Forced Choice ◽  
Reliability Estimation ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
High Stakes ◽  
Personnel Decisions ◽  
Assessment Scores ◽  
Reliability Estimates ◽  
Different Types

Forced-choice (FC) assessments of noncognitive psychological constructs (e.g., personality, behavioral tendencies) are popular in high-stakes organizational testing scenarios (e.g., informing hiring decisions) due to their enhanced resistance against response distortions (e.g., faking good, impression management). The measurement precisions of FC assessment scores used to inform personnel decisions are of paramount importance in practice. Different types of reliability estimates are reported for FC assessment scores in current publications, while consensus on best practices appears to be lacking. In order to provide understanding and structure around the reporting of FC reliability, this study systematically examined different types of reliability estimation methods for Thurstonian IRT-based FC assessment scores: their theoretical differences were discussed, and their numerical differences were illustrated through a series of simulations and empirical studies. In doing so, this study provides a practical guide for appraising different reliability estimation methods for IRT-based FC assessment scores.

The high precision measurement of 208Pb+208Pb Mott scattering at energies under the Coulomb barrier: the observation of new atomic effects

1995 ◽  
Vol 583 ◽  
pp. 263-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Lépine-Szily ◽  
J.M. Casandjian ◽  
W. Mittig ◽  
A.C.C. Villari ◽  
R. Lichtenthäler Filho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Precision ◽  
Precision Measurement ◽  
Coulomb Barrier ◽  
High Precision Measurement ◽  
Mott Scattering

Factor Analysis of the Stability of Self Scale

1980 ◽  
Vol 47 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1160-1162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen L. Franzoi ◽  
Benjamin J. Reddish
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Principal Components ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Factor Solution ◽  
The Stability

The factor structure of Rosenberg's Stability of Self Scale (1965) was investigated via principal components factor analysis. Data from 92 male and 171 female undergraduates yielded a one-factor solution, supporting Rosenberg's contention that the scale is unidimensional.

scholarly journals Acrylic target vessels for a high-precision measurement of θ13with the Daya Bay antineutrino detectors

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (06) ◽  
pp. P06004-P06004 ◽  
Author(s):  
H R Band ◽  
R L Brown ◽  
J Cherwinka ◽  
J Cao ◽  
Y Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Precision ◽  
Precision Measurement ◽  
Daya Bay ◽  
High Precision Measurement
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document