scholarly journals ANALISIS MODEL KOMUNIKASI PUBLIK SAMANERA DAN ATTHASILANI: STUDI KASUS PADEPOKAN DHAMMADIPA ARAMA BATU

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
HERMAN HERMAN
Keyword(s):  

Public Speaking (komunikasi publik) merupakan teknik berbicara kepada sekelompok orang secara terstruktur yang bertujuan untuk memberi informasi dan mempengaruhi pendengar. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui implementasi public speaking training terhadap samanera dan atthasilani di Padepokan Dhammadipa Arama Batu. Tujuan kedua adalah untuk mengetahui dampak public speaking training terhadap samanera dan atthasilani di Padepokan Dhammadipa Arama Batu. Riset ini dilakukan dengan teknik wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan public speaking samanera dan atthasilani Padepokan Dhammadipa Arama Batu ternyata masih rendah dan tidak ada standardisasi terhadap kualitas public speaking Samanera dan Atthasilani. Hal ini dikarenakan kurang adanya pembimbing dan pelatihan public speaking.  Temuan lain adalah adanya komunikasi dua arah samanera dan atthasilani dengan masyarakat dalam memaparkan tema ceramah yang lebih bersifat kontekstual. Hal ini berbeda dengan negara-negara Buddhis, seperti Thailand, Myanmar, dan Srilanka yang budaya komunikasinya lebih bersifat tekstual.   Kata kunci: Public speaking training, samanera, atthasilani.Buddhis, komunikasi publik

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (10) ◽  
pp. 3311-3325
Author(s):  
Brittany L. Perrine ◽  
Ronald C. Scherer

Purpose The goal of this study was to determine if differences in stress system activation lead to changes in speaking fundamental frequency, average oral airflow, and estimated subglottal pressure before and after an acute, psychosocial stressor. Method Eighteen vocally healthy adult females experienced the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) to activate the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis. The TSST includes public speaking and performing mental arithmetic in front of an audience. At seven time points, three before the stressor and four after the stressor, the participants produced /pa/ repetitions, read the Rainbow Passage, and provided a saliva sample. Measures included (a) salivary cortisol level, (b) oral airflow, (c) estimated subglottal pressure, and (d) speaking fundamental frequency from the second sentence of the Rainbow Passage. Results Ten of the 18 participants experienced a hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis response to stress as indicated by a 2.5-nmol/L increase in salivary cortisol from before the TSST to after the TSST. Those who experienced a response to stress had a significantly higher speaking fundamental frequency before and immediately after the stressor than later after the stressor. No other variable varied significantly due to the stressor. Conclusions This study suggests that the idiosyncratic and inconsistent voice changes reported in the literature may be explained by differences in stress system activation. In addition, laryngeal aerodynamic measures appear resilient to changes due to acute stress. Further work is needed to examine the influence of other stress systems and if these findings hold for dysphonic individuals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document