scholarly journals ADVANCE research 20 years later

2021 ◽  
pp. 36-45
Author(s):  
Zh. D. Kobalava ◽  
E. L. Kolesnik

Observational and interventional studies have shown that intensive blood pressure control may benefit in patients with diabetes. The Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diarnicron MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) international randomized, controlled, clinical trial was launched in 2001. According to the results of the study, the risk of major micro- and macrovascular events (primary endpoint) significantly decreased by 9%, while the risks of cardiovascular death and death from any cause decreased by 18% and 14%, respectively. There was a decrease in the risks of microvascular complications – any renal event, the appearance or worsening of nephropathy and the appearance of microalbuminuria by 21%, 18% and 21%, respectively. The results of the antihypertensive part of the ADVANCE study supplemented the expanding evidence base and served as the basis for changing clinical guidelines for the management of patients with hypertension and diabetes. According to the updated joint guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology / European Association for the Study of Diabetes (ESC/EASD), the target systolic / diastolic blood pressure levels should be 130/80 mmHg, with some exceptions, and the fixed combination of the RAAS blocker with a diuretic or calcium antagonist is suggested as first-line therapy.The observational ADVANCE-ON study, which enrolled 8494 patients out of 11 140 patients randomized to the ADVANCE study, found a memory effect, or ‘inheritance’, in which intensive blood pressure control during the study had a beneficial effect on various outcomes after its termination. These findings highlight the importance of achieving and maintaining optimal blood pressure control to reduce the risk of micro- and macrovascular complications.

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. O. Konradi

The paper is devoted to the rationale, design and first results of the ADVANCE study, its discussion and interpretation concerning clinical practice. The problem of blood pressure control in diabetic patients is reviewed, the impact of ADVANCE study into intensive blood pressure control is stressed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-115
Author(s):  
Teresa K. Chen ◽  
Chirag R. Parikh

Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that intensive blood pressure control is associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes. Acute kidney injury (AKI), however, was more common in the intensive treatment group prompting concern in the nephrology community. Summary: Clinical trials on hypertension control have traditionally defined AKI by changes in serum creatinine. However, serum creatinine has several inherent limitations as a marker of kidney injury, with various factors influencing its production, secretion, and elimination. Urinary biomarkers of kidney injury and repair have the potential to provide insight on the presence and phenotype of kidney injury. In both the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial and the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes study, urinary biomarkers have suggested that the increased risk of AKI associated with intensive treatment was due to hemodynamic changes rather than structural kidney injury. As such, clinicians who encounter rises in serum creatinine during intensification of hypertension therapy should “stay calm and carry on.” Alternative explanations for serum creatinine elevation should be considered and addressed if appropriate. When the rise in serum creatinine is limited, particularly if albuminuria is stable or improving, intensive blood pressure control should be continued for its potential long-term benefits. Key Messages: Increases in serum creatinine during intensification of blood pressure control may not necessarily reflect kidney injury. Clinicians should evaluate for other contributing factors before stopping therapy. Urinary biomarkers may address limitations of serum creatinine as a marker of kidney injury.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document