scholarly journals Kolostori kutatómunka Mongóliában

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2017/1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsuzsa Majer

The article describes the author’s fieldworks and research on different topicsin Mongolian Buddhist monasteries between 1999 and 2017. The researchtopics included the history and revival of Mongolian monasteries, description of different Mongolian Buddhist moansteries the ceremonial life andceremonial system in Mongolian temples, description of different specialMongolian Buddhist ceremonies, and currently the Tibetan language afterdeath rites in Mongolian Buddhist practice. The fieldworks are described inchronological order, and the emphasis is laid on describing the circumstancesof the investigations, as well as the difficulties the researchers had to face.All researches are described briefly, with references to the publicationswhere research outcomes are published.

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana Georgevsky ◽  
Ying Li ◽  
Kate Wyburn ◽  
Selvan Pather ◽  
Trevor TejadaBerges ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline Claesen ◽  
Sara Lucia Brazuna Tavares Gomes ◽  
francis tuerlinckx ◽  
wolf vanpaemel

Doing research inevitably involves making numerous decisions that can influence research outcomes in such a way that it leads to overconfidence in statistical conclusions. One proposed method to increase the interpretability of a research finding is preregistration, which involves documenting analytic choices on a public, third-party repository prior to any influence by data. To investigate whether, in psychology, preregistration lives up to that potential, we focused on all articles published in Psychological Science with a preregistered badge between February 2015 and November 2017, and assessed the adherence to their corresponding preregistration plans. We observed deviations from the plan in all studies, and, more importantly, in all but one study, at least one of these deviations was not fully disclosed. We discuss examples and possible explanations, and highlight good practices for preregistering research.


Author(s):  
Tracy Spencer ◽  
Linnea Rademaker ◽  
Peter Williams ◽  
Cynthia Loubier

The authors discuss the use of online, asynchronous data collection in qualitative research. Online interviews can be a valuable way to increase access to marginalized participants, including those with time, distance, or privacy issues that prevent them from participating in face-to-face interviews. The resulting greater participant pool can increase the rigor and validity of research outcomes. The authors also address issues with conducting in-depth asynchronous interviews such as are needed in phenomenology. Advice from the field is provided for rigorous implementation of this data collection strategy. The authors include extensive excerpts from two studies using online, asynchronous data collection.


1981 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 556
Author(s):  
Marc Howard Ross ◽  
Jean I. Martin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document