scholarly journals The new WHO classification of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors and immunohistochemical expression of somatostatin receptor 2 and 5

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oana Popa ◽  
Sorina Taban ◽  
Stelian Pantea ◽  
Andrei Plopeanu ◽  
Robert Barna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Who Classification ◽  
Somatostatin Receptor ◽  
Immunohistochemical Expression

Well-differentiated grade 3 digestive neuroendocrine tumors: Myth or reality? The PRONET study group.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4129-4129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Yves Scoazec ◽  
Anne Couvelard ◽  
Genevieve Monges ◽  
Emmanuelle Leteurtre ◽  
Genevieve Belleannee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Who Classification ◽  
Epidemiologic Study ◽  
Histologic Grade ◽  
World Health ◽  
Ki67 Index ◽  
Poorly Differentiated ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Incident Cases

4129 Background: In contrast to the 2000 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of digestive neuroendocrine tumors (NET) in which morphologic differentiation was the first criterion, the 2010 WHO classification of NET is based mostly on histologic grade. NET are now classified into three main categories: NET G1 (mitotic count <2/10 HPF and/or ≤2% Ki67 index), NET G2 (2-20/10 HPF and/or 3-20%), and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of small or large cell type. While NET G1 and G2 are well-differentiated tumors, NEC are considered poorly differentiated G3 tumors. We looked at the agreement between grade and differentiation to determine whether all NET can be readily classified according to the 2010 WHO classification. Methods: We designed a 1-year prospective, epidemiologic study to assess the characteristics of newly diagnosed NET, including diagnostic pathology. From August 2010 to July 2011, all pathology laboratories in France were invited to register all incident cases of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) and thoracic NET, excluding small cell carcinoma. For GEP-NET, investigators were asked to indicate morphologic differentiation (according to WHO 2000) and elements of histologic grade (mitotic index, Ki67 index), according to ENETS. Results: Of 500 invited centers, 80 participated; 1417 incidental cases were included and 77 excluded (duplicates or exclusion criteria), totaling 1340 cases; 778 (58.1%) were GEP-NET; 660/778 (85%) were well differentiated, 72 (9%) poorly differentiated, and 46 (6%) adenocarcinoid, nonclassified, or not evaluable; 422 (54.2%) were G1, 220 (28%) G2, 104 (13.5%) G3, and 32 (4.1%) had missing grades. Of those deemed G3, 72 (69%) were described as poorly differentiated, 21 (20%) as well differentiated (mean Ki67 index 35%, range 25%-60%), and 11 (10.5%) as adenocarcinoid. Conclusions: In this prospective, epidemiologic study, overall agreement between grade and differentiation was good. However, a significant proportion of G3 NET were classified as well differentiated and thus unclassifiable by 2010 WHO classification. This group of tumor deserves to be included in future classifications to help the clinician decide whether they should be treated as NET G1/G2 or NEC G3.

The Role of Wireless Capsule Endoscopy (WCE) in the Detection of Occult Primary Neuroendocrine Tumors

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-156
Author(s):  
Manuele Furnari ◽  
Andrea Buda ◽  
Gabriele Delconte ◽  
Davide Citterio ◽  
Theodor Voiosu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumor ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Somatostatin Receptor ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Wireless Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
First Line ◽  
Wireless Capsule

Background & Aims: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with unclear etiology that may show functioning or non-functioning features. Primary tumor localization often requires integrated imaging. The European Neuroendocrine Tumors Society (ENETS) guidelines proposed wireless-capsule endoscopy (WCE) as a possible diagnostic tool for NETs, if intestinal origin is suspected. However, its impact on therapeutic management is debated. We aimed to evaluate the yield of WCE in detecting intestinal primary tumor in patients showing liver NET metastases when first-line investigations are inconclusive.Method: Twenty-four patients with histological diagnosis of metastatic NET from liver biopsy and no evidence of primary lesions at first-line investigations were prospectively studied in an ENETS-certified tertiary care center. Wireless-capsule endoscopy was requested before explorative laparotomy and intra-operative ultrasound. The diagnostic yield of WCE was compared to the surgical exploration.Results: Sixteen subjects underwent surgery; 11/16 had positive WCE identifying 16 bulging lesions. Mini-laparotomy found 13 NETs in 11/16 patients (9 small bowel, 3 pancreas, 1 bile ducts). Agreement between WCE and laparotomy was recorded in 9 patients (Sensitivity=75%; Specificity=37.5%; PPV=55%; NPV=60%). Correspondence assessed per-lesions produced similar results (Sensitivity=70%; Specificity=25%; PPV=44%; NPV=50%). No capsule retentions were recorded.Conclusions: Wireless-capsule endoscopy is not indicated as second-line investigation for patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic NETs. In the setting of a referral center, it might provide additional information when conventional investigations are inconclusive about the primary site.Abbreviations: DBE: double balloon enteroscopy; GEP-NET: gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; GI: gastrointestinal; ENETS: European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society; NET: neuroendocrine tumor; SSRS: somatostatin receptor scintigraphy; WCE: wireless capsule endoscopy.

scholarly journals Predictive and Prognostic Impact of Blood-Based Inflammatory Biomarkers in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Commencing Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 504
Author(s):  
Fiona Ohlendorf ◽  
Rudolf Werner ◽  
Christoph Henkenberens ◽  
Tobias Ross ◽  
Hans Christiansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Response ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Somatostatin Receptor ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Inflammatory Biomarkers ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Peptide Receptor

Tumor microenvironment inflammation contributes to the proliferation and survival of malignant cells, angiogenesis, metastasis, subversion of adaptive immunity, and reduced treatment response. We aimed to evaluate the early predictive and prognostic significance of markers of systemic inflammation in patients receiving somatostatin-receptor targeted peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). This retrospective observational cohort study included 33 patients with advanced gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with PRRT. Pretreatment blood-based inflammatory biomarkers, e.g., Creactive protein levels (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), and absolute neutrophil count (ANC), were documented and inflammation indexes, e.g., neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Platelet × CRP multiplier (PCM), were calculated. Tumor burden was determined using [68Ga]GaDOTATATE PET/CT before enrollment and every 2 cycles thereafter until progression. Therapy response was assessed using RECIST 1.1, including its volumetric modification. Inflammatory biomarkers and inflammatory indexes demonstrated marked heterogeneity among patients, and were significantly higher in non-responders (e.g., CRP (P < 0.001), ANC (P = 0.002), and PCM (P < 0.001)). Change in whole-body tumor burden after two cycles of PRRT was significantly associated with CRP (P = 0.0157) and NLR (P = 0.0040) in multivariate regression analysis. A cut-off of 2.5 mg/L for CRP (AUC = 0.84, P = 0.001) revealed a significant outcome difference between patients with adversely high vs. low CRP (median PFS 508 days vs. not yet reached (HR = 4.52; 95% CI, 1.27 to 16.18; P = 0.02)). Tumor-driven systemic inflammatory networks may be associated with treatment response, change in tumor burden, and prognosis in patients with GEPNETs receiving PRRT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document