Assessing Organizational Readiness for Electronic Health Record Adoption in Long-Term Care Facilities

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 14-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Cherry
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1206-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Adler-Milstein ◽  
Katherine Raphael ◽  
Alice Bonner ◽  
Leslie Pelton ◽  
Terry Fulmer

Abstract Objective To measure US hospitals’ adoption of electronic health record (EHR) functions that support care for older adults, focusing on structured documentation of the 4Ms (What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility) and electronic health information exchange/communication with patients, caregivers, and long-term care providers. Materials and Methods In an online survey of a national, random sample of 797 US acute-care hospitals in 2018–2019, 479 (60.1%) responded. We calculated nationally representative measures of the percentages of hospitals with EHRs that include structured documentation of the 4Ms and exchange/communications functions. Results Structured EHR documentation of the 4Ms was fully implemented in at least 1 unit in 64.0% of hospitals and across all units in 41.5% of hospitals. Of the 4Ms, structured documentation was the highest for medications (91.3% in at least 1 unit) and the lowest for mentation (70.3% in at least 1 unit). All exchange/communication functions had been implemented in at least 1 unit in 16.2% of facilities and across all units in 7.6% of hospitals. Less than half of the hospitals had an EHR portal for long-term care facilities to access hospital information (45.4% in at least 1 unit), sent information electronically to long-term care facilities (44.6%), and had training for adults/caregivers on the patient portal (32.1%). Discussion Despite significant national investment in EHRs, hospital EHRs do not yet include key documentation, exchange, and communication functions needed to support evidence-based care for the older adults who comprise the majority of the inpatient population. Additional policy efforts are likely needed to promote the expansion of EHR capabilities into these high-value domains. Conclusions US acute-care hospital EHRs are lacking key functions that support care for older adults.


BMJ Open ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e006615-e006615 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. S. Kruse ◽  
M. Mileski ◽  
V. Alaytsev ◽  
E. Carol ◽  
A. Williams

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 350-356
Author(s):  
Kaylee A. Mehlman ◽  
Victoria Cho ◽  
Timothy W. Meyers

OBJECTIVE: To challenge the standard of practice by evaluating the identification of medication discrepancies found depending on type of access to an electronic health record (EHR). In other words, is there a difference in the number of discrepancies between a pharmacist with only access to the postacute long-term care (PALTC) EHR (ie, single-access pharmacist [SAP]) compared with a pharmacist with access to both the PALTC and hospital EHRs (ie, dual-access pharmacist DAP) In October 2018, the Improving Medicare PostAcute Care Transformation (IMPACT) Act mandated admission drug review (DRR) upon admission to a postacute, long-term care (PALTC) facility.<br/> SUMMARY:This was a prospective study investigating the occurrence of medication therapy problems (MTP) identified by two different DRR processes; SAP versus DAP. Data were collected in a community hospital and a stand-alone PALTC facility. It was found that the DAP identified more safety-related medication needs and medication omissions than an SAP. There was a significant association between the type of access and whether a MTP (ie, yes or no) was discovered, the type of medication-related need, and MTP category.<br/> CONCLUSION: These results strongly suggest that current standard of practice should change to require access to both hospital and PALTC EHR systems for a pharmacist completing the medication reconciliation. Until the gap in EHR interoperability is closed, the potential breakdown in communication associated with SAP places patients transitioning from hospital to PALTC facilities at increased risk for medication problems and accompanying adverse medication events.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 350-356
Author(s):  
Kaylee A. Mehlman ◽  
Victoria Cho ◽  
Timothy W. Meyers

Objective: To challenge the standard of practice by evaluating the identification of medication discrepancies found depending on type of access to an electronic health record (EHR). In other words, is there a difference in the number of discrepancies between a pharmacist with only access to the postacute long-term care (PALTC) EHR (ie, single-access pharmacist [SAP]) compared with a pharmacist with access to both the PALTC and hospital EHRs (ie, dual-access pharmacist DAP) In October 2018, the Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation (IMPACT) Act mandated admission drug review (DRR) upon admission to a post-acute, long-term care (PALTC) facility. Summary: This was a prospective study investigating the occurrence of medication therapy problems (MTP) identified by two different DRR processes; SAP versus DAP. Data were collected in a community hospital and a stand-alone PALTC facility. It was found that the DAP identified more safety-related medication needs and medication omissions than an SAP. There was a significant association between the type of access and whether a MTP (ie, yes or no) was discovered, the type of medication-related need, and MTP category. Conclusion: These results strongly suggest that current standard of practice should change to require access to both hospital and PALTC EHR systems for a pharmacist completing the medication reconciliation. Until the gap in EHR interoperability is closed, the potential breakdown in communication associated with SAP places patients transitioning from hospital to PALTC facilities at increased risk for medication problems and accompanying adverse medication events.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. e35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clemens Scott Kruse ◽  
Michael Mileski ◽  
Alekhya Ganta Vijaykumar ◽  
Sneha Vishnampet Viswanathan ◽  
Ujwala Suskandla ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Sharp ◽  
Kate L. Martin ◽  
Kate Martin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document