scholarly journals Technology Development Recommendations of Artificial Intelligence used in Library

Author(s):  
Emmanuel Genesius Evan Devara ◽  
Teguh Rijanandi ◽  
Rohman Beny Riyanto

The library is a place to read books with various collections so that readers can get various sources of knowledge. But in this technological era, people want things that are more practical. With the presence of Artificial intelligence, it can be applied and integrated into the library system. A common problem when readers come to the library is to look for literature according to their choice, both in terms of the name, image, type, and form of the literature. Artificial intelligence can help in searching literature based on recommendations and ratings, so readers don't have to bother looking for the desired literature one by one from the available bookshelves. This certainly makes it easier for readers to search for literature, especially those who are confused about where to look. The recommendation system used is the recommendation method, where the method is a method that combines Filtering and Ranking. This research is intended so that readers who are in the library can easily and quickly search for their literature.

Author(s):  
Jatin Sharma ◽  
Kartikay Sharma ◽  
Kaustubh Garg ◽  
Avinash Kumar Sharma

2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (8) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
Yujeong Kim

Today, each country has interest in digital economy and has established and implemented policies aimed at digital technology development and digital transformation for the transition to the digital economy. In particular, interest in digital technologies such as big data, 5G, and artificial intelligence, which are recognized as important factors in the digital economy, has been increasing recently, and it is a time when the role of the government for technological development and international cooperation becomes important. In addition to the overall digital economic policy, the Russian and Korean governments are also trying to improve their international competitiveness and take a leading position in the new economic order by establishing related technical and industrial policies. Moreover, Republic of Korea often refers to data, network and artificial intelligence as D∙N∙A, and has established policies in each of these areas in 2019. Russia is also establishing and implementing policies in the same field in 2019. Therefore, it is timely to find ways to expand cooperation between Russia and Republic of Korea. In particular, the years of 2020and 2021marks the 30th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the two countries, and not only large-scale events and exchange programs have prepared, but the relationship is deepening as part of the continued foreign policy of both countries – Russia’s Eastern Policy and New Northern Policy of Republic of Korea. Therefore, this paper compares and analyzes the policies of the two countries in big data, 5G, and artificial intelligence to seek long-term sustainable cooperation in the digital economy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Contini

The paper connects the potentially disruptive effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI) deployment in the administration of justice to the pre-existing trajectories and consequences of court technology development. The theoretical framework combines Luhmann’s theory of technology with actor–network theory to analyse how the new digital environment affects judicial agency. Then, it explores law and technology dynamics to map out the conditions that make legal the use of technologies in judicial proceedings. The framework is applied to analyse ‘traditional’ digital technologies (simple online forms and large-scale e-justice platforms) and AI-based systems (speech-to-text and recidivism assessment). The case comparison shows similarities and dynamics triggered by AI and traditional technologies, as well as a radical difference. While system developers and owners remain accountable before the law for the functioning of traditional systems, with AI, such accountability is transferred to users. Judges—users in general—remain accountable for the consequences of their actions supported or suggested by systems that are opaque and autonomous. This contingency, if not adequately faced with new forms of accountability, restricts the areas in which AI can be used without hampering judicial integrity.


Intexto ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 166-184
Author(s):  
João Damasceno Martins Ladeira

This article discusses the Netflix recommendation system, expecting to understand these techniques as a part of the contemporary strategies for the reorganization of television and audiovisual. It renders problematic a technology indispensable to these suggestions: the tools for artificial intelligence, expecting to infer questions of cultural impact inscribed in this technique. These recommendations will be analyzed in their relationship with the formerly decisive form for the constitution of broadcast: the television flow. The text investigates the meaning such influential tools at the definition of a television based on the manipulation of collections, and not in the predetermined programming, decided previously to the transmission of content. The conclusion explores the consequences of these archives, which concedes to the user a sensation of choice in tension with the mechanical character of those images.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document