scholarly journals Effects of Turbidity on Predation Vulnerability of Juvenile Humpback Chub to Rainbow Trout and Brown Trout

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 205-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Ward ◽  
Rylan Morton-Starner ◽  
Ben Vaage

Abstract Predation on juvenile native fish by introduced rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss and brown trout Salmo trutta is considered a significant threat to the persistence of endangered humpback chub Gila cypha in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Diet studies of rainbow trout and brown trout in Glen and Grand canyons indicate that these species eat native fish, but impacts are difficult to assess because predation vulnerability is highly variable depending on the physical conditions under which the predation interactions take place. We conducted laboratory experiments to evaluate how short-term predation vulnerability of juvenile humpback chub changes in response to changes in turbidity. In overnight laboratory trials, we exposed hatchery-reared juvenile humpback chub and bonytail Gila elegans (a surrogate for humpback chub) to adult rainbow trout and brown trout at turbidities ranging from 0 to 1,000 formazin nephlometric units. We found that turbidity as low as 25 formazin nephlometric units significantly reduced predation vulnerability of bonytail to rainbow trout and led to a 36% mean increase in survival (24–60%, 95% CI) compared to trials conducted in clear water. Predation vulnerability of bonytail to brown trout at 25 formazin nephlometric units also decreased with increasing turbidity and resulted in a 25% increase in survival on average (17–32%, 95% CI). Understanding the effects of predation by trout on endangered humpback chub is important when evaluating management options aimed at preservation of native fishes in Grand Canyon National Park. This research suggests that relatively small changes in turbidity may be sufficient to alter predation dynamics of trout on humpback chub in the mainstem Colorado River and that turbidity manipulation may warrant further investigation as a fisheries management tool.

2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (11) ◽  
pp. 1827-1849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josh Korman ◽  
Steven J.D. Martell ◽  
Carl J. Walters ◽  
Andrew S. Makinster ◽  
Lewis G. Coggins ◽  
...  

We used an integrated assessment model to examine effects of flow from Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona, USA, on recruitment of nonnative rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) in the Colorado River and to estimate downstream migration from Glen Canyon to Marble Canyon, a reach used by endangered native fish. Over a 20-year period, recruitment of rainbow trout in Glen Canyon increased with the annual flow volume and when hourly flow variation was reduced and after two of three controlled floods. The model predicted that approximately 16 000 trout·year–1 emigrated to Marble Canyon and that the majority of trout in this reach originate from Glen Canyon. For most models that were examined, over 70% of the variation in emigration rates was explained by variation in recruitment in Glen Canyon, suggesting that flow from the dam controls in large part the extent of potential negative interactions between rainbow trout and native fish. Controlled floods and steadier flows, which were originally aimed at partially restoring conditions before the dam (greater native fish abundance and larger sand bars), appear to have been more beneficial to nonnative rainbow trout than to native fish.


2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josh Korman ◽  
Michael D. Yard ◽  
Charles B. Yackulic

We estimated the abundance, survival, movement, and recruitment of non-native rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon to determine what controls their abundance near the Little Colorado River (LCR) confluence where endangered humpback chub (Gila cypha) rear. Over a 3-year period, we tagged more than 70 000 trout and recovered over 8200 tagged fish. Trout density was highest (10 000–25 000 fish·km–1) in the reach closest to Glen Canyon Dam, where the majority of trout recruitment occurs, and was 30- to 50-fold lower (200–800 fish·km–1) in reaches near the LCR confluence ∼100 km downstream. The extent of rainbow trout movement was limited with less than 1% of recaptures making movements greater than 20 km. However, because of high trout densities in upstream source areas, this small dispersal rate was sufficient to explain the threefold increase in the relatively small population near the LCR. Reducing dispersal rates of trout from upstream sources is the most feasible solution to maintain low densities near the LCR to minimize negative effects of competition and predation on humpback chub.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document