scholarly journals Ten-year observation of dentin bonding durability of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin cement —a SEM and TEM study

2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 438-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanako AOKI ◽  
Yuichi KITASAKO ◽  
Shizuko ICHINOSE ◽  
Michael F. BURROW ◽  
Meu ARIYOSHI ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 506-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shamim SULTANA ◽  
Toru NIKAIDO ◽  
Khairul MATIN ◽  
Miwako OGATA ◽  
Richard M. FOXTON ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1287-1290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Kyung Kim ◽  
Jun Sik Son ◽  
Kyo-Han Kim ◽  
Tae-Yub Kwon

2004 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Somsak SIRIRUNGROJYING ◽  
Tohru HAYAKAWA ◽  
Kayo SAITO ◽  
Daijiro MEGURO ◽  
Kimiya NEMOTO ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 441-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cemal YESILYURT ◽  
Muhammet Kerim AYAR ◽  
Tahsin YILDIRIM ◽  
Mustafa Sadık AKDAG

2020 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 111000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenan Peng ◽  
Luyao Yi ◽  
Ziming Wang ◽  
Hongye Yang ◽  
Cui Huang

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 178-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Bauer ◽  
Allana Silva e Silva ◽  
Edilausson Moreno Carvalho ◽  
Ceci Nunes Carvalho ◽  
Ricardo Marins Carvalho ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 556-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Tichy ◽  
K Hosaka ◽  
A Abdou ◽  
M Nakajima ◽  
J Tagami

Clinical Relevance The degree of conversion of contemporary universal adhesives positively correlates with the bond strength to dentin. The correlation is more marked after thermocycling, suggesting that a high degree of conversion is required for long-term dentin bonding durability. SUMMARY Purpose: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) of five contemporary universal adhesives to dentin after 24 hours and thermocycling (TC), to measure their degrees of conversion (DC) and to test the correlation between μTBS and DC. Methods and Materials: Four commercially available universal adhesives, Prime&Bond universal (PBU), Ecosite Bond (EB), G-Premio Bond (GPB), and Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (UBQ), and one experimental adhesive, UBQ without an amide monomer (UBQ-A), were used in this study. For the μTBS test, midcoronal dentin of 50 human molars was exposed, ground using 600-grit SiC paper, and the adhesives were applied according to the manufacturers’ instructions. After resin-composite buildup and 24-hour water storage, one-half of the specimens were subjected to 15,000 thermal cycles. The specimens were sectioned into beams and stressed in tension at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure. The DC of adhesives applied to dentin was evaluated using attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy immediately after light-curing. All data were statistically analyzed at a significance level of 0.05. Results: The highest μTBSs were obtained with UBQ, UBQ-A, and PBU, which were not significantly different from each other both after 24 hours and TC. The μTBS of GPB was lower compared with the aforementioned adhesives, but significantly only after TC, and the lowest μTBSs were obtained with EB. TC did not affect the μTBSs of UBQ, UBQ-A, and PBU significantly, but a significant decrease was observed with GPB and EB. The highest DC was obtained with PBU and UBQ, followed by 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate–rich adhesives UBQ-A and EB, which exhibited significantly lower DCs. The DC of GPB could not be determined because the reference peak at 1608 cm−1 was not detected in its spectra. A significant positive correlation was shown between μTBS and DC after 24 hours (r=0.716) and TC (r=0.856). Conclusion: μTBS and DC were positively correlated, more markedly after TC, which suggests that DC may be an important factor for bond durability.


Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 2099
Author(s):  
Kota Shimizu ◽  
Tomonori Satoh ◽  
Koichi Shinkai

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of combining specific adhesive materials and various surface treatments on bonding durability and microleakage of vertically fractured roots. Adhesive models were prepared using bovine lower incisors. The experiment included the following five groups: SB-G group (control) (10% citric acid with 3% ferric chloride solution (10-3 solution) + an adhesive resin cement (4-META/MMA-TBB; Super-Bond®)), EC group (self-cure bonding agent (UB) + core composite resin (EC)), EC-G group (10-3 solution + UB + EC), EC-P group (40% phosphate solution + UB + EC), and EC-E group (18% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution + UB + EC). After applying a load of 50,000 cycles, microleakage, microtensile bond strength (μTBS), and failure modes were examined. Microleakage of the EC, EC-G, and EC-E groups was significantly lower than that of the EC-P group. The μTBS of the EC-G group was significantly higher than that of the other groups. All EC groups showed that mixed (cohesive and adhesive) and adhesive failures were the most prevalent types of failure modes. The EC-G group showed the highest bonding durability and the lowest microleakage results, which indicates a possible alternative to current adhesive and tooth surface treatments.


2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayça Deniz Izgi ◽  
Eylem Kaya ◽  
Ediz Kale ◽  
Mustafa Zortuk

SummaryBackground/Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of glass ceramic inlay system using 2 antibacterial adhesive luting protocols with 2 cementation techniques to bur-cut dentin.Material and Methods: Class I inlay cavities with 6-degree occlusal divergence and size of 6-, 3- and 2-mm in length, width and depth, were prepared on extracted human molars, randomly assigned to 2 main groups; each to 1 cementation technique, with or without immediate-dentin-bonding (IDB or NIDB) further divided into 3 subgroups; 2 to 2 antibacterial luting protocols, traditional (T) and experimental (E); and 1 to a control (C) group. In group IDBT, IDB-E and IDB-C dentin bonding was applied immediately after cavity preparation. In group NIDB-T, NIDB-E and NIDB-C dentin bonding was applied just before cementation of the restorations. The cavities in IDB-T and NIDB-T were treated with 2% chlorhexidine-digluconate (CHX) prior to dentin bonding application. The cavities in IDB-E and NIDB-E were treated only with dentin bonding system containing MDPB (12-methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide) active monomer featuring antibacterial effect. IDB-C and NIDB-C served as control. Dual-cure adhesive resin cement was used for the cementation of lithium disilicate-based ceramic inlay restorations. Fourteen test specimens per group were prepared for microtensile testing and consecutively subjected to tensile load at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The mode of failure was observed under SEM and evaluated for each group. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to investigate the statistical difference between groups (α=0.05).Results: The microtensile load was 5.96 MPa (median: 5.99 MPa) for IDB-T, 7.23 MPa (median: 7.55 MPa) for IDB-E, 6.68 MPa (median: 6.56 MPa) for IDB-C, 7.24 MPa (median: 7.20 MPa) for NIDB-T, 6.98 MPa (median: 6.30 MPa) for NIDB-E, and 7.02 MPa (median: 6.99 MPa) for NIDB-C, with no statistical difference between the groups (p>0.05). SEM monitoring for mode of failure revealed either cohesive (within resin cement) or adhesive-cohesive (mostly within resin cement along with partially involved areas between resin cement and ceramic restoration) character.Conclusions: Within the limitations of the current study, none of the tested antibacterial luting protocols with either cementation technique was found to be superior in terms of bond strength.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document