The 3G (Third Generation) of Mobile Communications Technology Standards

Through the 1G and 2G mobile communications technology standardizations, the involved actors became smarter and were able to develop more sophisticated strategies. For the GSM camp, moving the whole GSM market to its favorable technology standard to control and dominate the market for the next generation mobile communications technology was extremely significant. In this situation, what could the actors in the GSM camp do? What could the CDMA camp and other actors who did not belong to either camp (actors in Japan and China) do? This chapter answers all these questions.

How the decade-long unfolding of 3G is being morphed into the convergence of communications and computing is described. With this new technology direction, actors in both the mobile and computing industries have started fighting to define the next generation mobile standard.


Based on the experience of the NMT standardization, some actors that had been involved in the NMT standardization (e.g., Ericsson) heavily participated in the standardization of a 2G mobile communications technology. They were successfully able to standardize the technology they pursued as the European mobile telecommunications technology standard. Considering all these European actors’ early efforts, it was not a surprise that the GSM standard (the European 2G mobile communications technology standard) expanded its territory. The surprise came from the evolution of CDMA. How could the late entrant, Qualcomm, be able to create and expand the CDMA market? This chapter reveals not only fiery competitions among actors to standardize GSM and CDMA but also conflicts between GSM and CDMA camps as a group.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 166-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susmita Chatterjee ◽  
Bibek Ray Chaudhuri ◽  
Debabrata Dutta

In this article, we look at the determinants of the new technology adoption by consumers in the case of mobile telecommunications. The dynamic nature of the telecom industry is a result of the frequent technological change. Consumers witness different technology standards in mobile communications, starting from the first generation (1G) to second generation (2G) subsequently to third (3G) and now experiencing fourth (4G) in some countries such as Norway, Sweden, South Korea, and the USA including ours. The movement from one standard to the other has been predicted to be smooth as all of them are vertical substitutes for each other. Given the various dimensions such as price, requirements, utility and so on, these technology standards are not perfect substitutes. The article investigates the prospect of a new technology standard roll out in India. A survey of 400 mobile phone customers in metro telecom circles has been carried out for this purpose. The study applies structural equation modeling (SEM) and explores the adoption intention of this new technology among the respondents. Results show that the presence of low-cost alternatives that is the availability of a lower technology standard poses a significant hurdle to the adoption of new technology services.


2012 ◽  
Vol 433-440 ◽  
pp. 2498-2503
Author(s):  
Quan Bo Yuan ◽  
Feng Juan Qu ◽  
Hui Zhao ◽  
Li Yuan Liu

At present,Chinese third-generation communications technology (3G) has been applied, and global internet of things technology development has been put on the agenda. The fourth-generation communication technology will be discussed based on the wireless communication field, mainly introducing the development situation of fourth-generation communication system. In the paper, the key technology will be discussed in detail, and is involved in domestic network development. Finally, the fourth-generation communication technology in the network is prospected.


During the development of the first generation (1G) mobile communications technologies, many organizations had not thought about standardizing a mobile communications technology. Due to the fact that a mobile communications market was regional and a network was run by a government agency or a monopoly organization, the standardization of a mobile communications technology was not occur to them. However, an interesting movement came from Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden), which was standardizing a mobile communications technology. This chapter reveals the standardizations of the first generation (1G) mobile communications technologies including the Nordic Mobile Telephone (NMT) standard and the impact of the NMT standard on the history of the mobile communications technology standards.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Jiang ◽  
Kazuyuki Motohashi ◽  
Wentao Liu ◽  
Xu Zhang

Purpose This study aims to investigate the relevance of knowledge-oriented leadership (KOL) to technology standard innovation (TSI) from a temporary-team perspective. The mediating and moderating effect on knowledge integration (KI) and leader–member exchange (LMX) is emphasized. Design/methodology/approach The conceptual model is built based on an exhaustive literature review and is empirically tested in terms of a sample of 341 Chinese individuals with TSI experience. Quantitative analysis was performed using a questionnaire with the bootstrapping method used to demonstrate the mediating effect of KI. Findings The empirical results of this study prove that KI mediates the relationship between KOL and TSI. The authors deduce that LMX moderates the positive relation between KOL and KI. Originality/value Few studies have investigated the innovation activities of technology standards from a temporary-team perspective. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to look into the underlying mechanism of KOL in TSI. This research deepens the analysis by introducing LMX’s moderating role in the innovation process of technology standards, thereby providing valuable insights for leaders of innovation activities of technology standards and illuminating new aspects of knowledge-intensive temporary-team management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document