RTI and Reading at the Secondary Level

2015 ◽  
pp. 78-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Hall ◽  
Jamie Mahoney
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Reading Strategies ◽  
Secondary Level ◽  
Inclusive Classroom ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Academic Needs ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Effective Prevention ◽  
Resource Classroom ◽  
Tiered System

Response to Intervention (RTI) provides a framework for effective prevention and intervention to students who have difficulty reading at all achievement levels by using a school-wide, tiered system. RTI is the means for helping struggling students become successful readers before they have a chance to fall behind. Using evidence-based reading strategies within multiple classrooms such as the inclusive classroom or the resource classroom provides students with learning disabilities the opportunity to succeed in all content areas while applying these reading strategies. All teachers can use these strategies to assist the at-risk and struggling reader make progress. The purpose of this chapter is to share research, resources, and reading instructional methods appropriate for students at the secondary level that can help them meet their academic needs.

RTI and Reading at the Secondary Level

2016 ◽  
pp. 687-710
Author(s):  
Carol Hall ◽  
Jamie Mahoney
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Reading Strategies ◽  
Secondary Level ◽  
Inclusive Classroom ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Academic Needs ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Effective Prevention ◽  
Resource Classroom ◽  
Tiered System

Response to Intervention (RTI) provides a framework for effective prevention and intervention to students who have difficulty reading at all achievement levels by using a school-wide, tiered system. RTI is the means for helping struggling students become successful readers before they have a chance to fall behind. Using evidence-based reading strategies within multiple classrooms such as the inclusive classroom or the resource classroom provides students with learning disabilities the opportunity to succeed in all content areas while applying these reading strategies. All teachers can use these strategies to assist the at-risk and struggling reader make progress. The purpose of this chapter is to share research, resources, and reading instructional methods appropriate for students at the secondary level that can help them meet their academic needs.

Teaching Middle School Students With Learning Disabilities to Comprehend Text Using Self-Questioning

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 276-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurice M. Joseph ◽  
Kelsey M. Ross
Keyword(s):  
Middle School ◽  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Middle School Students ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Effective Strategy ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
School Students ◽  
Reading Text ◽  
Progress Monitor

Middle school students with learning disabilities often struggle to gain meaning from text. Engaging in self-questioning is an effective strategy for comprehending text, however, middle school students with learning disabilities often do not naturally engage in self-questioning before, during, or after reading. These students may also have difficulty generating questions to ask themselves while reading text. This article presents evidence-based methods and specific instructional scaffolds for teaching middle school students with learning disabilities to generate questions on their own before, during, and after reading. A discussion of how to progress monitor students’ acquisition of self-questioning will also be provided.

Specific Learning Disabilities

2016 ◽  
pp. 170-205
Author(s):  
George Uduigwome
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Early Intervention ◽  
Progress Monitoring ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Specific Learning Disabilities ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Systematic Instruction ◽  
Associated Conditions ◽  
Specific Learning

This chapter discusses best practices in providing supports for students diagnosed with reading (dyslexia), writing (dysgraphia), and spelling (dysorthographia) deficits. It examines some impacts of these and associated conditions on learning. The recommended strategies for leveraging learning for the identified population are all evidence-based. Per the author, early intervention is key to providing students with learning disabilities a meaningful learning experience. An early intervention involves the use of multiple measures to diagnose a student's present level of performance primarily with a view to finding strengths (Strengths can be used to mitigate deficits) and learning gaps, utilizing evidence-based systematic instruction delivered with treatment fidelity, and an ongoing progress monitoring.

Writing and Writing Difficulties From Primary Grades to College

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Graham ◽  
Tracey E. Hall
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Elementary School ◽  
Writing Process ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Writing Difficulties ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Considerable Difficulty ◽  
Students With Ld

In today’s world, writing is an essential skill. At school, writing is often used to gauge students’ understanding of content material as well as to promote the learning of it. Students with learning disabilities (LD) and those at risk for writing difficulties experience considerable difficulty with almost every aspect of writing. The field of LD is developing a reasonable foundation of knowledge about what and how students with LD and those at risk for LD write. The articles in this series contribute to our growing knowledge of how students with LD struggle with the writing process and can benefit from evidence-based practices, beginning in elementary school and continuing into college. The purpose of this article is to introduce the special series on writing and writing difficulties. Three of the articles are included in this issue, and the two remaining articles will appear in the next issue. This introduction provides readers with the rationale for the series, the purpose of each article, and a brief overview of each contribution.

Actionable 10: A Checklist to Boost Mathematics Teaching for Students With Learning Disabilities

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 148-154
Author(s):  
Soyoung Park ◽  
Diane Pedrotty Bryant ◽  
Barbara Dougherty
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Mathematics Teaching ◽  
Grade Level ◽  
Mathematics Instruction ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Evidence Based Practices

This article presents a checklist of 10 evidence-based practices for educators to apply in mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities. The checklist is “actionable,” meaning the items on the checklist can be put into action immediately. It provides practical strategies teachers can adopt to fit their lessons regardless of their specific mathematical domain areas or student grade level. The focus of this article is translating research of evidence-based strategies into practice for mathematics instruction.

Specific Learning Disabilities

2020 ◽  
pp. 320-355
Author(s):  
George Uduigwome
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Early Intervention ◽  
Progress Monitoring ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Specific Learning Disabilities ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Systematic Instruction ◽  
Associated Conditions ◽  
Specific Learning

This chapter discusses best practices in providing supports for students diagnosed with reading (dyslexia), writing (dysgraphia), and spelling (dysorthographia) deficits. It examines some impacts of these and associated conditions on learning. The recommended strategies for leveraging learning for the identified population are all evidence-based. Per the author, early intervention is key to providing students with learning disabilities a meaningful learning experience. An early intervention involves the use of multiple measures to diagnose a student's present level of performance primarily with a view to finding strengths (Strengths can be used to mitigate deficits) and learning gaps, utilizing evidence-based systematic instruction delivered with treatment fidelity, and an ongoing progress monitoring.

The Concrete–Representational–Abstract Approach for Students With Learning Disabilities: An Evidence-Based Practice Synthesis

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 211-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily C. Bouck ◽  
Rajiv Satsangi ◽  
Jiyoon Park
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Instructional Framework ◽  
Abstract Approach ◽  
Best Evidence Synthesis

As researchers and practitioners have increasingly become interested in what practices are evidence based and for whom in education, different sets of quality indicators and evidence-based practice standards have emerged in the field of special education. Practices are commonly suggested as evidence based, even without a best evidence synthesis on the existing research, such as the case with the concrete–representational–abstract (CRA) instructional framework to support students with disabilities in mathematics. This study sought to support the classification of the CRA instructional framework as an evidence-based approach for students with learning disabilities by applying quality indicators and standards of evidence-based practice by Cook et al. (2014). Based on the application of the indicators and standards, the CRA instructional framework was determined to be an evidence-based practice for students with learning disabilities who struggle in mathematics relative to computational problems, such as addition, subtraction, and multiplication, largely with regrouping.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document