English Language Learners and the Response to Intervention Model

2015 ◽  
pp. 198-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Christine Higgins
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Response To Intervention ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
Language Impairment ◽  
English Language ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Speech And Language Impairment ◽  
Rti Model ◽  
Research Based Interventions

English language learners (ELLs) are often misdiagnosed as having a learning disability or speech and language impairment and as a result are placed into special education programs. Response to Intervention (RTI) is a framework that can reduce this misdiagnosis and help these learners achieve more over time. This chapter explains how some of this misdiagnosis occurs and how to use Response to Intervention with the ELL population to overcome this problem. It includes research-based interventions proven to work for this population, suggestions on how to implement an RTI model, and case studies of students who represent situations that often come up in the field. With successful implementation of an RTI program, it is hoped that all students will receive the targeted support that they need and deserve.

English Language Learners and the Response to Intervention Model

2016 ◽  
pp. 569-593
Author(s):  
Melissa Christine Higgins
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Response To Intervention ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
Language Impairment ◽  
English Language ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Speech And Language Impairment ◽  
Rti Model ◽  
Research Based Interventions

English language learners (ELLs) are often misdiagnosed as having a learning disability or speech and language impairment and as a result are placed into special education programs. Response to Intervention (RTI) is a framework that can reduce this misdiagnosis and help these learners achieve more over time. This chapter explains how some of this misdiagnosis occurs and how to use Response to Intervention with the ELL population to overcome this problem. It includes research-based interventions proven to work for this population, suggestions on how to implement an RTI model, and case studies of students who represent situations that often come up in the field. With successful implementation of an RTI program, it is hoped that all students will receive the targeted support that they need and deserve.

The Role of Dynamic Assessment Within the Response to Intervention Model in School-Age English Language Learners

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 99-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda I. Rosa-Lugo ◽  
Elizabeth Rivera ◽  
Terrie Kate Rierson
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Response To Intervention ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
English Language ◽  
Dynamic Assessment ◽  
School Age ◽  
Language Differences ◽  
Idea 2004 ◽  
Rti Model

Response to Intervention (RtI) has been recommended in IDEA (2004) as an alternative approach for addressing the needs of all learners. This article discusses the role of dynamic assessment (DA) within the RtI Model for school-age English Language Learners (ELLs). This article provides an overview of DA and RtI, notes their similarities and differences, and discusses the usefulness of DA and RtI in helping speech-language pathologists (SLPs) discriminate language differences from language disorders and monitor progress in ELLs. A case study is presented to demonstrate how SLPs can use DA and RtI in the assessment of ELLs.

Children's Nonword Repetition Tasks and English Language Learners

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 73-79
Author(s):  
Sara C. Steele ◽  
Deborah A. Hwa-Froelich
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
Language Impairment ◽  
English Language ◽  
Nonword Repetition ◽  
Adopted Children ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Bilingual Speakers ◽  
Internationally Adopted Children ◽  
English Speaking

Nonword repetition performance has been shown to differentiate monolingual English-speaking children with language impairment (LI) from typically developing children. These tasks have been administered to monolingual speakers of different languages and to simultaneous and sequential bilingual English Language Learners (ELLs) with mixed results. This article includes a review of the nonword repetition performance of monolingual and bilingual speakers and of internationally adopted children. Clinical implications for administration and interpretation of nonword repetition task outcomes are included.

Determining English Language Learners' Response to Intervention: Questions and Some Answers

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Linan-Thompson ◽  
Paul T. Cirino ◽  
Sharon Vaughn
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
English Language Learners ◽  
Response To Intervention ◽  
Reading Instruction ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
Reading Fluency ◽  
English Language ◽  
First Grade ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Not At Risk

Using an extant database, we examined three grade 1 criteria for identifying response to intervention (RTI) in English language learners (ELLs): (a) set benchmark criteria with a standard score above 95 (37th %ile) on both decoding and comprehension measures and a raw score of 40 or more correct words per minute (CWPM) on oral reading fluency; (b) discrepancy benchmark criteria, with performance on these measures at or above the mean of not-at-risk peers; and (c) discrepancy slope criteria, with growth during grade 1 on these measures at or above the mean of not-at-risk peers. The sample consisted of 81 students (41 intervention, 40 comparison) who were bilingual (Spanish/English) and were part of a supplemental reading instruction study during first grade. The three grade 1 criteria were evaluated in relation to a set benchmark criteria in grade 2. Results indicated that approximately 80% of the students did not meet any criteria in either year, but that the discrepancy slope criteria in grade 1 were most predictive of set benchmark criteria in grade 2. Recognizing that we applied highly stringent criteria, implications and issues are presented related to using RTI with ELLs to facilitate decision making about further intervention and referral for special education.

scholarly journals Toward Equity-Based Pedagogy: Monolingual Teachers’ Transformative Thinking Process

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 387-406
Author(s):  
Bogum Yoon
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
English Language Learners ◽  
Language Learning ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
English Language ◽  
Teacher Education Programs ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Local Schools ◽  
Monolingual Teachers ◽  
Thinking Process

Abstract The reality that English language learners (ell s) have not been receiving adequate support in the mainstream classroom calls for urgency to prepare teachers in teacher education programs. Grounded in the theoretical construct of praxis and linguistically and culturally relevant approach (lcra), the purpose of this article is to share the author’s experience on how she supported monolingual teachers to engage in equity-based pedagogy. This article will focus on the specific projects that the author’s graduate students (mostly white and monolingual teachers/teacher candidates) conducted as a way to better understand the diverse needs of ell s in the dominant English context. The projects include: reflecting on monolingual identities through being in ell s’ shoes, building professional capital through theories of language learning, discussing and critiquing texts on ell s with a critical lens, designing lessons that integrate ell s’ culture as well as conducting the fieldwork in local schools, and synthesizing learning through the options of multiple final projects including learning a new language (e.g., ell s’ primary language). These activities intended to promote monolingual teachers’ transformative thinking process through the process of praxis and lcra in teacher education programs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document