Best Practices to Promote Patient and Donor Engagement to Care in Living Donor Transplant

Author(s):  
Emanuela Saita ◽  
Susanna Zanini ◽  
Enrico Minetti ◽  
Chiara Acquati

Increasing evidence has demonstrated that patients' involvement promotes better health care outcomes and cost-effectiveness of services. However, limited literature is available about the experience of living donor kidney transplantation and best practices to promote patients and donors' engagement. Aim of the present chapter is to review the literature about patient engagement in the context of chronic kidney disease, and to introduce an innovative protocol developed to promote potential donors and recipients' participation and adherence to care at the Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital in Milan (Italy). Results are critical to reflect on the identification of best practices for patients' engagement in the context of chronic kidney disease. Through a better understanding of the emotional and affective dynamics and the relational implications that may influence the elaboration of the information given by health care providers, it will be possible to develop evidence-informed interventions.

2017 ◽  
pp. 306-327
Author(s):  
Emanuela Saita ◽  
Susanna Zanini ◽  
Enrico Minetti ◽  
Chiara Acquati

Increasing evidence has demonstrated that patients' involvement promotes better health care outcomes and cost-effectiveness of services. However, limited literature is available about the experience of living donor kidney transplantation and best practices to promote patients and donors' engagement. Aim of the present chapter is to review the literature about patient engagement in the context of chronic kidney disease, and to introduce an innovative protocol developed to promote potential donors and recipients' participation and adherence to care at the Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital in Milan (Italy). Results are critical to reflect on the identification of best practices for patients' engagement in the context of chronic kidney disease. Through a better understanding of the emotional and affective dynamics and the relational implications that may influence the elaboration of the information given by health care providers, it will be possible to develop evidence-informed interventions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 205435811773453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharanya Ramesh ◽  
Matthew T. James ◽  
Jayna M. Holroyd-Leduc ◽  
Stephen B. Wilton ◽  
Ellen W. Seely ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kara Burns ◽  
Craig A McBride ◽  
Bhaveshkumar Patel ◽  
Gerard FitzGerald ◽  
Shane Mathews ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Consumer-generated health data (CGHD) are any clinically relevant data collected by patients or their carers (consumers) that may improve health care outcomes. Like patient experience measures, these data reflect the consumer perspective and is part of a patient-centric agenda. The use of CGHD is believed to enhance diagnosis, patient engagement, and thus foster an improved therapeutic partnership with health care providers. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to further identify how these data were used by consumers and how it influences engagement via a validated framework. In addition, carer data has not been explored for the purpose of engagement. METHODS Study 1 used interviews with CGHD-experienced patients, carers, and doctors to understand attitudes about data collection and use, developing an ontological framework. Study 2 was a pilot trial with carers (parents) of children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. For 10 days carers generated and emailed surgical site photographs to a tertiary children’s hospital. Subsequently, carers were interviewed about the engagement framework. In total, 60 interviews were analyzed using theme and content analysis. RESULTS This study validates a framework anchored in engagement literature, which categorizes CGHD engagement outcomes into 4 domains: physiological, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral. CGHD use is complex, interconnected, and can be organized into 10 themes within these 4 domains. CONCLUSIONS CGHD can instigate an ecosystem of engagement and provide clinicians with an enhanced therapeutic relationship through an extended view into the patient’s world. In addition to clinical diagnosis and efficient use of health care resources, data offer another tool to manage consumers service experience, especially the emotions associated with the health care journey. Collection and use of data increases consumers sense of reassurance, improves communication with providers, and promotes greater personal responsibility, indicating an empowering consumer process. Finally, it can also improve confidence and satisfaction in the service.


2001 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-165
Author(s):  
Katherine Pohlman ◽  
Nadine Schwab

Because school nursing practice by definition involves delivering services to minors, school nurses often find themselves with questions about consent. Because school districts, much like other health care providers, occasionally face liability for the undesired health care outcomes of their clients (i.e., students), another question that surfaces frequently deals with release from liability. Each question must be answered based on analysis of the specific facts and applicable laws. This article provides an overview of the principles that provide school nurses with general guidance on consent issues and release of liability and, by way of example, applies them in the answers to four specific questions forwarded by practicing school nurses.


2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharona Hoffman ◽  
Andy Podgurski

The unsustainable growth in U.S. health care costs is in large part attributable to the rising costs of pharmaceuticals and medical devices and to unnecessary medical procedures. This fact has led health reform advocates and policymakers to place considerable hope in the idea that increased government support for research on the comparative effectiveness of medical treatments will eventually help to reduce health care expenses by informing patients, health care providers, and payers about which treatments for common conditions are effective and which are not. Comparative effectiveness research (CER) has shown in some cases that expensive but commonly used treatments are significantly less effective than relatively inexpensive alternatives. Critics warn, however, that CER will homogenize patient care, limit patient choices, and lead to improper health care rationing and even to the denial of lifesaving treatments.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 174550651986123
Author(s):  
Annie Lewis-O’Connor ◽  
Abi Warren ◽  
Jeannie V Lee ◽  
Nomi Levy-Carrick ◽  
Samara Grossman ◽  
...  

Within the context of longitudinal medical care for adults, health care providers have a unique opportunity to inquire and respond to the traumatic life experiences affecting the health of their patients, as well as a responsibility to minimize retraumatizing these patients during medical encounters. While there is literature on screening women for intimate partner violence, and there is emerging data on pediatric screening for adverse life experiences, there is sparse literature on inquiry of broader trauma histories in adult medical settings. This lack of research on trauma inquiry results in an absence of guidelines for best practices, in turn making it challenging for policy makers, health care providers, and researchers to mitigate the adverse health outcomes caused by traumatic experiences and to provide equitable care to populations that experience a disproportionate burden of trauma. This state of the science summarizes current inquiry practices for patients who have experienced trauma, violence, and abuse. It places trauma inquiry within an anchoring framework of trauma-informed care principles, and emphasizes a focus on resilience. It then proposes best practices for trauma inquiry, which include tiered screening starting with broad trauma inquiry, proceeding to risk and safety assessment as indicated, and ending with connection to interventions.


2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 426-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce Engel ◽  
Dawn Prentice

Interprofessional collaboration has become accepted as an important component in today’s health care and has been guided by concerns with patient safety, quality health-care outcomes, and economics. It is widely accepted that interprofessional collaboration improves patient outcomes through enhanced communication among health-care providers and increased accessibility to services. Although there is a paucity of research that provides confirmatory evidence, interprofessional competencies continue to be incorporated into the curricula of health-care students. This article examines the ethics of interprofessional collaboration and ethical issues that arise from the mainstream adoption of interprofessional competencies and the potential for moral distress in nursing.


2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl A Sadowski ◽  
Catherine Lyder ◽  
Nesé Yuksel

<p><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinicians often face challenges in deciding how to treat osteoporosis in patients with chronic kidney disease. As background to offering guidance to health care providers, it is important to understand their practices and beliefs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the practices and beliefs of pharmacists regarding use of bisphosphonates for patients with osteoporosis and chronic kidney disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of pharmacists working in hospitals and related health care settings was conducted. A 34-item online questionnaire was developed consisting of 4 sections: demographic characteristics, practices, beliefs, and comfort level with making decisions about osteoporosis treatment. An e-mail invitation was sent to members of the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists (<em>n </em>= 2499) in November 2012.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 367 pharmacists completed the survey. Most of the respondents were women (258 [70%]), had more than 10 years in practice (213 [58%]), and were providing care to 1 or more osteoporosis patients per week (212 [58%]). Over one-third (150 [41%]) stated that they would use a bisphosphonate for patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) of 15–30 mL/min, but more than half (207 [56%]) stated that they would avoid a bisphosphonate (and recommend another medication) for patients with CrCl below 15 mL/min. Forty-eight percent (176/363) agreed that oral bisphosphonates could be used for patients with renal failure (defined as CrCl &lt; 30 mL/min), so long as dosage adjustments are made. More than half (206/363 [57%]) believed that the adverse effects of oral bisphosphonates increase for patients with renal failure. Respondents expressed a low level of comfort in assessing and initiating osteoporosis treatment for patients with renal failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacists had varying beliefs about managing osteoporosis in patients with chronic kidney disease. This study highlights the need for practice tools and targeted education addressing the use of bisphosphonates for these patients.</p><p><strong>RÉSUMÉ</strong></p><p><strong>Contexte : </strong>Les cliniciens sont souvent confrontés à des défis lorsqu’ils doivent choisir un traitement contre l’ostéoporose chez les patients atteints d’insuffisance rénale chronique. Afin d’être en mesure de guider les fournisseurs de soins de santé, il importe de comprendre leurs pratiques et leurs croyances.</p><p><strong>Objectif : </strong>Offrir un portrait des pratiques et croyances des pharmaciens en ce qui a trait à l’emploi des bisphosphonates chez les insuffisants rénaux chroniques atteints d’ostéoporose.</p><p><strong>Méthodes : </strong>Une enquête transversale a été réalisée auprès de pharmaciens exerçant en établissements de santé. Un questionnaire en ligne a été élaboré. Il contenait 34 éléments répartis en 4 sections, soit : les caractéristiques démographiques; les pratiques; les croyances; et le degré d’aisance en ce qui a trait au choix d’un traitement contre l’ostéoporose. Un courriel d’invitation a été envoyé aux membres de la Société canadienne des pharmaciens d’hôpitaux (<em>n </em>= 2499) en novembre 2012.</p><p><strong>Résultats : </strong>Au total, 367 pharmaciens ont participé au sondage. La plupart des répondants étaient des femmes (258 [70 %]), possédaient plus de 10 années de pratique (213 [58 %]) et fournissaient hebdomadairement des soins à au moins un patient ostéoporotique (212 [58 %]). Plus d’un tiers (150 [41 %]) ont indiqué qu’ils emploieraient un bisphosphonate chez les patients affichant une clairance de la créatinine (ClCr) entre 15 et 30 mL/min, mais plus de la moitié (207 [56 %]) ont affirmé qu’ils n’en utiliseraient pas (et qu’ils recommandaient un autre médicament) chez les patients présentant une ClCr en deçà de 15 mL/min. Quarante-huit pour cent (176/363) ont affirmé que les bisphosphonates oraux pouvaient être employés pour les patients présentant une insuffisance rénale (définie comme une ClCr &lt; 30 mL/min), pourvu que l’on procède à des ajustements posologiques. Plus de la moitié (206/363 [57 %]) croyaient que les effets indésirables des bisphosphonates oraux sont plus importants chez les patients souffrant d’insuffisance rénale. Les répondants ont indiqué être peu à l’aise lorsque vient le temps d’évaluer et d’amorcer un traitement contre l’ostéoporose chez les insuffisants rénaux.</p><p><strong>Conclusions : </strong>Les pharmaciens adhéraient à diverses croyances en ce qui touche la prise en charge de l’ostéoporose chez les insuffisants rénaux. La présente étude met en évidence le besoin d’outils pour la pratique ainsi que d’enseignement ciblé portant sur l’emploi des bisphosphonates chez les patients atteints d’insuffisance rénale.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document