Capital Management and Budgeting in Taiwan

Author(s):  
Wei-Jie Liao ◽  
Nai-Ling Kuo

In this chapter, the authors provide an overview of Taiwan's public infrastructure system using the recommended normative framework presented in Chapter 1. In general, most of Taiwan's practices fit the requirements suggested in Chapter 1. However, there are still rooms for improvements in prioritization, debt affordability analysis, and infrastructure maintenance. In addition, the build-operate-transfer (BOT) model and the so-called “Mosquito Buildings” also feature Taiwan's capital management and budgeting process and are discussed in this chapter. Nowadays, Taiwanese governments place much emphasis on disaster prevention, environmental protection, and renewable energy. These new trends may also affect Taiwan's capital management and budgeting process.

Author(s):  
Jiseul Kim

The author aims to provide a comprehensive understanding about the current capital management and budgeting practices (CMBP) in the Republic of Korea (hereafter Korea). The book chapter starts with description of the importance of public capital assets and several issues of the current infrastructure system. It then provides the background of Korea's public infrastructure, political regime, and government institutions. Based on the suggested normative framework, the author specifically describes the four major components of CMBP: capital planning, capital budgeting and financial management, centralized execution and project management, infrastructure maintenance. Following the analysis of the current CMBP practices, some of reform ideas are discussed in the conclusion.


Author(s):  
Erica Ceka

As Moldova works toward building democracy and sustainable development, it is focusing its attention on increasing the effectiveness of public capital investment management. The chapter summarizes the current legal framework and practices in the field of capital management and budgeting in Moldova and compares the processes with a normative framework for effective capital investment management, focusing on capital planning, capital financial management, capital project execution and management, and public infrastructure maintenance. The analysis demonstrates that the public capital management and budgeting process in Moldova at the level of planning, allocation, and implementation of capital budgets falls short of its potential. The case reveals that despite a promising budgetary reform and comprehensive legal framework, the process of capital budgeting and management in Moldova remains ineffective due to institutional, economic, and political constraints.


Author(s):  
Arwiphawee Srithongrung ◽  
Juita-Elena (Wie) Yusuf ◽  
Kenneth A. Kriz

This chapter introduces the readers to a public capital management and budgeting process and its role in generating public infrastructure networks. The main purpose of the chapter is to describe the normative public capital management and budgeting practices that are recommended by the public finance literature. These normative practices are segregated into four main components: (1) long-term capital planning, (2) capital budgeting and financial management, (3) capital project execution and project management, and (4) infrastructure maintenance. Given that the literature recommends specific practices to maximize efficiency in public capital spending, the four main components, combined, are referred to as the systematic capital management and budgeting process. The systematic process discussed in detail in this chapter is used as a common framework for each of the 12 country case studies in describing their respective public capital management and budgeting practices.


Author(s):  
Arwiphawee Srithongrung ◽  
Juita-Elena (Wie) Yusuf

This chapter evaluates the 12 countries' capital management practices according to the systematic public capital management and budgeting process described in Chapter 1. The chapter characterizes and classifies the management practices of the twelve countries based on the authors' evaluation using the case study descriptions. The authors offer some initial observations based on comparisons across the case study countries and analysis of relationships between capital management and budgeting practices and political, economic, and public sector variables. The chapter proposes a tentative theory of public investment behavior and offers five propositions regarding the factors driving different practices across the case study countries and the consequences of a systematic capital management and budgeting process.


Author(s):  
Arwiphawee Srithongrung ◽  
Juita-Elena (Wie) Yusuf

This chapter evaluates the 12 countries' capital management practices according to the systematic public capital management and budgeting process described in Chapter 1. The chapter characterizes and classifies the management practices of the twelve countries based on the authors' evaluation using the case study descriptions. The authors offer some initial observations based on comparisons across the case study countries and analysis of relationships between capital management and budgeting practices and political, economic, and public sector variables. The chapter proposes a tentative theory of public investment behavior and offers five propositions regarding the factors driving different practices across the case study countries and the consequences of a systematic capital management and budgeting process.


Author(s):  
Arwiphawee Srithongrung ◽  
Juita-Elena (Wie) Yusuf ◽  
Kenneth A. Kriz

This chapter introduces the readers to a public capital management and budgeting process and its role in generating public infrastructure networks. The main purpose of the chapter is to describe the normative public capital management and budgeting practices that are recommended by the public finance literature. These normative practices are segregated into four main components: (1) long-term capital planning, (2) capital budgeting and financial management, (3) capital project execution and project management, and (4) infrastructure maintenance. Given that the literature recommends specific practices to maximize efficiency in public capital spending, the four main components, combined, are referred to as the systematic capital management and budgeting process. The systematic process discussed in detail in this chapter is used as a common framework for each of the 12 country case studies in describing their respective public capital management and budgeting practices.


2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edmund Nana Kwame Nkrumah ◽  
Tindi Stephen ◽  
Lydia Takyi ◽  
Oswin Aganda Anaba

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document