Reducing Second Language Writing Anxiety

Author(s):  
Bashak Tarkan-Blanco

Academic writing is a difficult task for many post-secondary students in the U.S. However, it is particularly challenging for ESL students due to linguistic and cognitive factors. This challenge may lead to second language writing anxiety (SLWA), as a result of which some students may perform poorly on writing assignments and eventually fail the course. Although previous research studies offer instructional strategies to address SLWA, they are insufficient in their theoretical basis and practical application. Thus, this paper fills that gap by situating those pedagogical recommendations within their theoretical foundations and includes a sample writing assignment with a student self-regulation checklist.

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abir Aly Eldaba ◽  
Janet Kesterson Isbell

In a critical study, researchers explored academic writing experiences of three international female graduate students at a southern U.S. university in order to understand their perspectives of themselves as writers across cultures, their experiences with academic writing, and their coping strategies for academic writing assignments. Findings revealed participants’ challenges and self-doubts about second-language writing abilities. Participants both challenged disconfirmation of their writing and at times were submissive as they negotiated a graduate degree program. The study demonstrates need for universities to recognize marginalized groups’ knowledge and ways of knowing and to create spaces to discuss new possibilities for academic writing experiences among international students.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Kirsten Reid

<p>Students studying in university contexts often find learning to write English for academic purposes especially challenging. Some of the challenges reside in acquiring the necessary skills and strategies to be successful academic writers. A less tangible consideration which has received recent attention from first and second language writing researchers is the relationship between writing and identity. How do student writers become part of a situated community in which some discourses may be privileged over others? While all writing can be a potential site of struggle, this may have particular significance for second language students who bring their own unique backgrounds and literacy histories to their academic writing and may find becoming part of a new and heterogeneous discourse community profoundly unsettling. Using case study methods, this dissertation explores the experiences of four undergraduate students as they become academic writers in a second language. It also carries out an analysis of some of the linguistic features one particular student essay to examine how writers simultaneously construct their texts and are constructed by them.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 308-322
Author(s):  
Omar Abdullah Altamimi ◽  
Mona Masood

The past two decades witnessed increased attention in the role of Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) in improving the English as a second language(ESL) students’ written linguistic accuracy. Several methods were suggested, including the use of the electronic means of providing corrective feedback. The electronic methods proved to be effective despite the limited numbers and contexts. However, the extent of these studies is still unknown. Furthermore, no comprehensive review of the studies had been conducted to date. This systematic literature review will identify and classify the research on providing ESL teachers with Electronic Written Corrective Feedback (EWCF). A survey of several experimental and analytical studies that focused on testing the effect of different methods of EWCF on ESL students was conducted, covering the period between 2006 and 2020. Two major groups of studies emerged from this research, and several gaps were identified. The research concluded with several recommendations regarding the potential tracks for future research on EWCF. The current research will serve as a guideline for ESL writing practitioners and researchers on future teacher corrective feedback in second language writing.


2003 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-157

03—335 Bacha, Nahla N. (Lebanese American U., Byblos, Lebanon; Email: [email protected]). Developing learners' academic writing skills in higher education: A study for educational reform. Language and Education (Clevedon, UK), 16, 3 (2002), 161—77.03—336 Bimmel, Peter (U. van Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Strategische lessen lernen in der Fremdsprache. [Learning strategic reading in foreign languages.] Zeitschrift für Fremdsprachenforschung (Berlin, Germany), 13, 1 (2002), 113—41.03—337 Bloch, Joel (The Ohio State U., USA; Email: [email protected]). Student/teacher interaction via email: The social context of Internet discourse. Journal of Second Language Writing (Norwood, NJ, USA), 11, 2 (2002), 117—34.03—338 Kobayashi, Hiroe (Hiroshima U., Japan; Email: [email protected]) and Rinnert, Carol. High school student perceptions of first language literacy instruction: Implications for second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing (Norwood, NJ, USA), 11, 2 (2002), 91—116.03—339 Lee, Icy (Hong Kong Baptist U.; Email: [email protected]). Teaching coherence to ESL students: A classroom inquiry. Journal of Second Language Writing (Norwood, NJ, USA), 11, 2 (2002), 135—59.03—340 Lindgren, Eva and Sullivan, Kirk P. H. (Umeå U., Sweden; Email: [email protected]). The LS graph: A methodology for visualizing writing revision. Language Learning (Malden, MA, USA), 52, 3 (2002), 565—95.03—341 Schindler, Kirsten (Universität Bielefeld, Germany). Gemeinsames Schreiben in der Fremdsprache: Muster, Kreativität und das Glück des Autors. [Writing together in a foreign language: Models, creativity and the happiness of the author.] Glottodidactica (Poznán, Poland), 28 (2002), 161—84.03—342 Sullivan, Kirk and Lindgren, Eva (Uméa U., Sweden; Email: [email protected]). Self-assessment in autonomous computer-aided second language writing. ELT Journal (Oxford, UK), 56, 3 (2002), 258—66.


Author(s):  
Jalil Fathi ◽  
Sara Mohebiniya ◽  
Saeed Nourzadeh

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of self-assessment and peer-assessment activities on second language (L2) writing self-regulation of Iranian English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners. For this purpose, a sample of forty-six English major students from two intact classes at an Iranian Islamic Azad University were recruited as the participants of the present study. Then, the two classes were randomly assigned to a self-assessment group (N=22) and a peer-assessment group (N=24). The self-assessment group was instructed on the writing assessment criteria in order to self-assess their writing tasks and the peer-assessment group was trained on how to assess the writings of their peers. The treatment carried out for the self-assessment and peer-assessment groups lasted for a period of one university semester. The data was collected through Second Language Writing Self-regulation (SLWS) administered as the pre-test and post-test of the study. The results obtained from the data analysis indicated that both self-assessment and peer-assessment were conducive in enhancing L2 writing self-regulation of the participants. Nevertheless, further analysis of the data indicated that the participants in the peer-assessment group were better than those in the self-assessment group with regard to writing self-regulation, suggesting that peer-assessment activities were more effective than the self-assessment activities in contributing to enhancing writing self-regulation of the EFL learners. The justification of the findings and their implications for L2 writing pedagogy are also discussed.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Abdullah Altamimi ◽  
Mona Masood

The past two decades witnessed increased attention in the role of Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) in improving the English as a second language(ESL) students’ written linguistic accuracy. Several methods were suggested, including the use of the electronic means of providing corrective feedback. The electronic methods proved to be effective despite the limited numbers and contexts. However, the extent of these studies is still unknown. Furthermore, no comprehensive review of the studies had been conducted to date. This systematic literature review will identify and classify the research on providing ESL teachers with Electronic Written Corrective Feedback (EWCF). A survey of several experimental and analytical studies that focused on testing the effect of different methods of EWCF on ESL students was conducted, covering the period between 2006 and 2020. Two major groups of studies emerged from this research, and several gaps were identified. The research concluded with several recommendations regarding the potential tracks for future research on EWCF. The current research will serve as a guideline for ESL writing practitioners and researchers on future teacher corrective feedback in second language writing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document