Charge Sheet to Charging

2021 ◽  
pp. 246-257
Author(s):  
Debarati Halder
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Case Management ◽  
Special Reference ◽  
Positive Solutions ◽  
Essential Elements ◽  
Criminal Justice Systems ◽  
Justice Systems ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Relationship Of

Police and prosecution are the two essential elements in criminal justice systems, especially for justice delivery to the victims as well as for the accused. Cybercrimes targeting women have remained a menace for the victims, police, and prosecution for over a decade now in India and the UK. This chapter aims to research on the comparative analysis of relationship of police and prosecution for case management with special reference to cybercrimes against women cases between UK and India to find positive solutions for restitution of justice in such cases.

Terrorist Speech and the Criminal Law – A Comparative Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Keiler
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Critical Analysis ◽  
Vantage Point ◽  
Criminal Justice Systems ◽  
Justice Systems ◽  
Legal Frameworks

This article examines the ways that the criminal justice systems of England and the Netherlands deal with terrorist speech in the form of direct and indirect incitement to terrorism. This contribution commences with a discussion of the conditions under which the criminalisation of terrorist speech is justified. That discussion identifies criteria that must be satisfied if liability for terrorist speech is to be justified. The specific English and Dutch legal frameworks for addressing terrorist speech are then assessed in light of those criteria. This comparison provides the vantage point for a critical analysis of the merits and defects of terrorist speech offences. This contribution ends by identifying and discussing doctrinal elements that must be considered in order to ensure compliance with fundamental principles of criminal law and to prevent over-criminalisation.

scholarly journals Public attitudes towards the use of automatic facial recognition technology in criminal justice systems around the world

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0258241
Author(s):  
Kay L. Ritchie ◽  
Charlotte Cartledge ◽  
Bethany Growns ◽  
An Yan ◽  
Yuqing Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Facial Recognition ◽  
Public Attitudes ◽  
International Survey ◽  
Private Companies ◽  
Criminal Justice Systems ◽  
The World ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Justice Systems ◽  
The Uk

Automatic facial recognition technology (AFR) is increasingly used in criminal justice systems around the world, yet to date there has not been an international survey of public attitudes toward its use. In Study 1, we ran focus groups in the UK, Australia and China (countries at different stages of adopting AFR) and in Study 2 we collected data from over 3,000 participants in the UK, Australia and the USA using a questionnaire investigating attitudes towards AFR use in criminal justice systems. Our results showed that although overall participants were aligned in their attitudes and reasoning behind them, there were some key differences across countries. People in the USA were more accepting of tracking citizens, more accepting of private companies’ use of AFR, and less trusting of the police using AFR than people in the UK and Australia. Our results showed that support for the use of AFR depends greatly on what the technology is used for and who it is used by. We recommend vendors and users do more to explain AFR use, including details around accuracy and data protection. We also recommend that governments should set legal boundaries around the use of AFR in investigative and criminal justice settings.

“We’ll Take the Tough Ones”

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 542-584
Author(s):  
Chrysanthi S. Leon ◽  
Corey S. Shdaimah
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Diversion Programs ◽  
Social Emotional ◽  
Theoretical Frameworks ◽  
Material Resources ◽  
Professional Goals ◽  
Criminal Justice Systems ◽  
Working Groups ◽  
Justice Systems

Expertise in multi-door criminal justice enables new forms of intervention within existing criminal justice systems. Expertise provides criminal justice personnel with the rationale and means to use their authority in order to carry out their existing roles for the purpose of doing (what they see as) good. In the first section, we outline theoretical frameworks derived from Gil Eyal’s sociology of expertise and Thomas Haskell’s evolution of moral sensibility. We use professional stakeholder interview data (N = 45) from our studies of three emerging and existing prostitution diversion programs as a case study to illustrate how criminal justice actors use what we define as primary, secondary, and tertiary expertise in multi-agency working groups. Actors make use of the tools at their disposal—in this case, the concept of trauma—to further personal and professional goals. As our case study demonstrates, professionals in specialized diversion programs recognize the inadequacy of criminal justice systems and believe that women who sell sex do so as a response to past harms and a lack of social, emotional, and material resources to cope with their trauma. Trauma shapes the kinds of interventions and expertise that are marshalled in response. Specialized programs create seepage that may reduce solely punitive responses and pave the way for better services. However empathetic, they do nothing to address the societal forces that are the root causes of harm and resultant trauma. This may have more to do with imagined capacities than with the objectively best approaches.

scholarly journals Unintended consequences of drug policies experienced by young drug users in contact with the criminal justice systems

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-47
Author(s):  
Jacek Moskalewicz ◽  
Katarzyna Dąbrowska ◽  
Maria Dich Herold ◽  
Franca Baccaria ◽  
Sara Rolando ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Drug Users ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Criminal Justice Systems ◽  
Drug Policies ◽  
Justice Systems

Setting the parameters of ‘digital (criminal) justice’ in Scotland

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-208
Author(s):  
Mike Nellis
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Professional Practice ◽  
Policy Debate ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Policy Document ◽  
Criminal Justice Systems ◽  
Information And Communication ◽  
Justice Systems ◽  
Scottish Government ◽  
Critical Literature

The term ‘digital justice’ has been used by the Scottish Government to delineate the potential of information and communication technology (ICT) in its civil, administrative and criminal justice systems. This paper concentrates on the latter area, outlining the content of the original 2014 digital justice strategy document and the subsequent Holyrood conferences used to promote it (Scottish Government, 2014). It notes gaps in the strategy, not least a failure to specify what human beings could and should be doing in digitized justice systems, and ambiguity about the endpoint of ‘full digitization’, which could be very threatening to existing forms of professional practice. It sets the policy debate in the broader context of increasing automation and the more critical literature on digitization, concluding with recommendations for a revised policy document, ideas which may be of interest outside Scotland.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document