Design Science Research to Produce Instrumental Knowledge for Evidence-Based Practice in OCD

2021 ◽  
pp. 225-242
Author(s):  
Joan Ernst van Aken
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Conceptual Knowledge ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Design Science Research ◽  
Research Strategy ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
Action Theories

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a promising approach to improve professional action. EBP is the use of the best available knowledge in professional problem-solving, in particular the best available knowledge produced by research. EBP has much promise for organizational change and development (OCD). However, for successful EBP, one needs a well-developed knowledge base of instrumental knowledge (i.e., knowledge-to-act). Unfortunately, academic OCD research is strong in developing conceptual knowledge (i.e., knowledge-to-understand) but rather weak in instrumental knowledge. In this chapter, design science research (DSR) is discussed: a research strategy to develop instrumental knowledge in the form of designs for effective interventions, processes, or systems to improve present practices. These designs are developed through experiential learning by executing a number of problem-solving projects in the messy “swamp of practice,” often executed in partnerships with professionals. Embedded-in-action theories can be powerful inputs for EBP, thus improving the practice of OCD.

Design Science Research to Produce Instrumental Knowledge for Evidence-Based Practice in OCD

2019 ◽  
pp. 93-110
Author(s):  
Joan Ernst van Aken
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Conceptual Knowledge ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Design Science Research ◽  
Research Strategy ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
Action Theories

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a promising approach to improve professional action. EBP is the use of the best available knowledge in professional problem-solving, in particular the best available knowledge produced by research. EBP has much promise for organizational change and development (OCD). However, for successful EBP, one needs a well-developed knowledge base of instrumental knowledge (i.e., knowledge-to-act). Unfortunately, academic OCD research is strong in developing conceptual knowledge (i.e., knowledge-to-understand) but rather weak in instrumental knowledge. In this chapter, design science research (DSR) is discussed: a research strategy to develop instrumental knowledge in the form of designs for effective interventions, processes, or systems to improve present practices. These designs are developed through experiential learning by executing a number of problem-solving projects in the messy “swamp of practice,” often executed in partnerships with professionals. Embedded-in-action theories can be powerful inputs for EBP, thus improving the practice of OCD.

Principles, methods, contributions, and limitations of design science research in marketing: Illustrative application to customer journey management

2021 ◽  
pp. 205157072110325
Author(s):  
Florence Jacob ◽  
Virginie Pez ◽  
Pierre Volle
Keyword(s):  
Research Methodology ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Design Science Research ◽  
Research Strategy ◽  
Customer Journey ◽  
Design Science Research Methodology ◽  
Application Methods ◽  
Practical Recommendations ◽  
Illustrative Application

The purpose of this article is to present the principles, application methods, contributions, and limitations of the design science research methodology (DSRM), a research strategy based on design science research (DSR). After presenting the principles of DSRM, we show how to use this method by applying it to the problem of customer journey management. We make practical recommendations for applying the method, and discuss its contributions and limitations. By presenting a method that meets the requirements of both rigor and relevance, this article contributes to the renewal of research methods used in our discipline.

scholarly journals Identificando propriedades essenciais de registros eletrônicos de saúde

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Tuler de Albergaria ◽  
Marcello Peixoto Bax ◽  
Raquel Oliveira Prates ◽  
Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis
Keyword(s):  
Design Science ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Design Science Research ◽  
Iso 13606

Introdução: Inserido no desafio de possibilitar a interação de profissionais da saúde com prontuários eletrônicos baseados na Norma ISO 13606 permitindo a personalização de interface ao mesmo tempo que se preserva a estrutura e padronização dos Sistemas de Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde (S-RES), o presente recorte objetiva caracterizar propriedades essenciais de S-RES - flexibilidade, padronização e estrutura e facilidade de interação - analisando-se três destes sistemas. Método: Utilizou-se o método de Design Science Research que busca gerar conhecimento teórico a partir da resolução de um problema prático (identificado no contexto da investigação mais ampla). Mais especificamente, no objetivo explicitado neste recorte, efetivou-se uma revisão de literatura sobre os requisitos existentes e dificuldades dos usuários dos sistemas S-RES, seguida de um levantamento e caracterização das propriedades essenciais dos S-RES e do estabelecimento de critérios de análise. O método de inspeção completa a proposta metodológica, visto que as questões (que indicam os critérios) foram apresentadas a dois especialistas para a análise dos Sistemas. Resultados: No recorte proposto, as propriedades levantadas como essenciais dos sistemas foram caracterizadas e analisadas em três S-RES. Confirmou-se a importância das propriedades essenciais destes tipos de sistemas, ainda que verifique a dificuldade de serem atendidas em um mesmo sistema. Conclusão: Os desafios postos aos S-RES não são pontuais ou mesmo de um contexto de uso. Como trabalho futuro propõe-se a criação de um modelo de interface extensível de interface para sistemas de Registro Eletrônico de Saúde baseados na ISO 13606.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document