A Case Study to Assess Implementation of Electronic Health Records at Central Flacq Hospital, Mauritius

Author(s):  
Mohit Arora ◽  
Ashish Joshi

The challenges of implementing electronic health records (EHRs) have received some attention, but little is known about the process of transitioning from paper-based to electronic files. In this paper, a mixed approach using combined qualitative and quantitative methods is utilized. The authors enrolled nine administrative managers and 87 employees from different backgrounds, all part of a regional hospital at Flacq in Mauritius, from April to May 2011. Employees responded to a survey on various aspects pertaining to their eagerness to accept the shift to electronic health records and their views on the probability of success. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the quantitative results and content analysis was performed on the qualitative data. Nurses performing at middle level agreed that a shift to EHR is positive but felt that it might take a long time to effect the change. With its implementation, they agreed that advantages like up to date information, diminished workload, and cost effectiveness would be easily attained. In contrast, focus groups confirmed that without the collaboration and support of management, implementation of EHR would prove arduous.

Author(s):  
Romaric Marcilly ◽  
Jessica Schiro ◽  
Louise Heyndels ◽  
Sandra Guerlinger ◽  
Annick Pigot ◽  
...  

It is necessary for hospitals to be able to compare the usability of electronic health records (EHR) before acquisition. Adding usability as a critical element of the procurement process is therefore crucial. During the competitive usability evaluation of several EHRs, the usability walkthrough method has the potential of making end-users more active in the procurement process than demonstrations. This case study presents first results of a comparison of three EHRs performed by nine representative end-users. All users uncovered usability problems while performing their scenarios. The results show that none of the EHRs evaluated is without major usability problems. These problems have been well-known to human factors researchers for a long time.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e110900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine I. Morley ◽  
Joshua Wallace ◽  
Spiros C. Denaxas ◽  
Ross J. Hunter ◽  
Riyaz S. Patel ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 48-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Rasmi ◽  
Malik B. Alazzam ◽  
Mutasem K. Alsmadi ◽  
Ibrahim A. Almarashdeh ◽  
Raed A. Alkhasawneh ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 1538-1548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofie Wass ◽  
Vivian Vimarlund

In this study, we explore how healthcare professionals in primary care and outpatient clinics perceive the outcomes of giving patients online access to their electronic health records. The study was carried out as a case study and included a workshop, six interviews and a survey that was answered by 146 healthcare professionals. The results indicate that professionals working in primary care perceive that an increase in information-sharing with patients can increase adherence, clarify important information to the patient and allow the patient to quality-control documented information. Professionals at outpatient clinics seem less convinced about the benefits of patient accessible electronic health records and have concerns about how patients manage the information that they are given access to. However, the patient accessible electronic health record has not led to a change in documentation procedures among the majority of the professionals. While the findings can be connected to the context of outpatient clinics and primary care units, other contextual factors might influence the results and more in-depth studies are therefore needed to clarify the concerns.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document