scholarly journals Uso da máscara N95 por trabalhadores de enfermagem expostos à fumaça cirúrgica/ Use of the N95 mask by nursing workers exposed to surgical smoke

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Manoel Netto ◽  
Helenize Ferreira Lima Leachi ◽  
Nathanye Crystal Stanganelli ◽  
Aline Franco da Rocha ◽  
Renata Perfeito Ribeiro
Keyword(s):  

Objetivo: verificar os desconfortos apresentados por trabalhadores que necessitam utilizar a máscara N95 durante as suas atividades laborais. Método: pesquisa descritiva com delineamento transversal, desenvolvida no Centro Cirúrgico de um hospital de ensino localizado na região Sul do Brasil, no período de junho a agosto de 2019, durante o turno de trabalho diurno. Realizou-se o estudo com os profissionais de enfermagem que estavam expostos à fumaça cirúrgica no período de trabalho. Para a coleta dos dados, utilizou-se um instrumento com detalhamento sociodemográfico e ocupacional dos participantes e entregou-se uma máscara N95 aos profissionais para ser utilizada durante a cirurgia, a fim de verificar o tempo de uso da N95 e os motivos pelos quais os trabalhadores retiraram a máscara durante o ato anestésico-cirúrgico. Resultados: o maior número de trabalhadores (27,7%) utilizou a máscara até 3 horas durante o ato anestésico-cirúrgico, sendo que esse tempo foi relacionado com algumas queixas (p=0,037), tais como incômoda (27,8%), apertada (44,4%) eenjoo (5,6%). A retirada da máscara N95 (p=0,022) por esses profissionais antes do término da cirurgia foi relacionada a essas queixas. Conclusão: os trabalhadores apresentam queixas, como desconforto, máscara apertada e enjoo, sendo que estas estão relacionadas com o tempo de uso, o que precisa ser avaliado por gestores para a utilização da N95.

2021 ◽  
Vol 217 ◽  
pp. 112231
Author(s):  
Chun-Hui Chiu ◽  
Chi-Tsung Chen ◽  
Ming-Huei Cheng ◽  
Li-Heng Pao ◽  
Chi Wang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Isaac Cheruiyot ◽  
Prabjot Sehmi ◽  
Brian Ngure ◽  
Musa Misiani ◽  
Paul Karau ◽  
...  

AORN Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-51
Author(s):  
Rebecca Vortman ◽  
Sara McPherson ◽  
M. Cecilia Wendler

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Drevet ◽  
Jean-Michel Maury ◽  
Naoual Bakrin ◽  
François Tronc

AbstractObjectivesMalignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a devastating evolution of several malignancies. Pressurized intrathoracic aerosol chemotherapy (PITAC) might be a novel therapy option in MPE.MethodsPITAC is considered for patients with MPE with a performance status <2 and without other metastatic sites. General anesthesia is administered and a double-lumen bronchial tube is inserted. The patient is placed in a lateral decubitus position, and the operation is performed after ipsilateral lung exclusion. Two 12-mm balloon trocars are inserted—one in the seventh intercostal space in the mid-axillary line and one in the fifth intercostal space in the anterior axillary line. Extent of pleural disease and volume of MPE are documented. MPE is removed and parietal pleural biopsy are performed. An intrathoracic pressure of 12 mmHg CO2 is established, and a combination of Cisplatin (10.5 mg/m2 in a total volume of 150 cc NaCl 0.9%) and Doxorubicin (2.1 mg/m2 in a total volume of 50 cc NaCl 0.9%) are aerosolized via nebulizer in the pleural cavity. Vital signs and nebulization are remote-controlled. After 30 min, the remaining toxic aerosol is exhausted using a closed surgical smoke evacuation system. A 24Fr chest tube is inserted in postero-apical position with continuous negative pressure of 20 cm H2O. When needed, PITAC may be repeated every six weeks in alternate with systemic chemotherapy.ResultsIn our hands, the technique above has shown to be feasible and safe.ConclusionsFurther studies are needed to assess the potential symptomatic and oncological benefits of PITAC in MPE.


2021 ◽  
pp. 155335062110148
Author(s):  
Umberto Bracale ◽  
Vania Silvestri ◽  
Emanuele Pontecorvi ◽  
Immacolata Russo ◽  
Maria Triassi ◽  
...  

Background. The COVID-19 pandemic leads to several debates regarding the possible risk for healthcare professionals during surgery. SAGES and EAES raised the issue of the transmission of infection through the surgical smoke during laparoscopy. They recommended the use of smoke evacuation devices (SEDs) with CO2 filtering systems. The aim of the present study is to compare the efficacy of different SEDs evaluating the CO2 environmental dispersion in the operating theater. Methods. We prospectively evaluated the data of 4 group of patients on which we used different SEDs or standard trocars: AIRSEAL system (S1 group), a homemade device (S2 group), an AIRSEAL system + homemade device (S3 group), and with standard trocars and without SED (S4 group). Quantitative analysis of CO2 environmental dispersion was carried out associated to the following data in order to evaluate the pneumoperitoneum variations: a preset insufflation pressure, real intraoperative pneumoperitoneum pressure, operative time, total volume of insufflated CO2, and flow rate index. Results. 16 patients were prospectively enrolled. The [CO2] mean value was 711 ppm, 641 ppm, 593 ppm, and 761 ppm in S1, S2, S3, and S4 groups, respectively. The comparison between data of all groups showed statistically significant differences in the measured ambient CO2 concentration. Conclusion. All tested SEDs seem to be useful to reduce the CO2 environmental dispersion respect to the use of standard trocars. The association of AIRSEAL system and a homemade device seems to be the best solution combining an adequate smoke evacuation and a stable pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 1555-1561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arzu Ilce ◽  
Ganime Esra Yuzden ◽  
Meryem Yavuz van Giersbergen
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 122-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cara Sanderson
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 233 (5) ◽  
pp. e56
Author(s):  
Leigh J. Sowerby ◽  
Anthony Nichols ◽  
Doron D. Sommer ◽  
Corey Moore ◽  
Douglas Fraser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document