Improved Differential Evolution Algorithm for Structural Optimization Design of Flumes with Hybrid Discrete Variables

2011 ◽  
Vol 383-390 ◽  
pp. 672-677
Author(s):  
Juan Zhou ◽  
Duo Xin Zhang ◽  
Xian Liang Liu

The traditional method applying to solve continuous variable optimization problems is not suit for flume structural optimization design with hybrid discrete variable. According to the mathematical model of structural optimum design of the prestressed U-shell flumes, differential evolution (DE) algorithm was introduced to flume structural optimization design. In order to improve the population’s diversity and the ability of escaping from the local optimum, a self-adapting crossover probability factor was presented. Furthermore, a chaotic sequence based on logistic map was employed to self-adaptively adjust mutation factor based on linear crossover, which can improve the convergence of DE algorithm. Dynamic penalty function, to transform the constrained problem to unconstrained one, was employed. The result shows that, compared with the original design scheme, the optimization design scheme can greatly reduce the amount of prestressed reinforcement. The construction cost of both the flume and the whole project can be reduced accordingly.

2013 ◽  
Vol 415 ◽  
pp. 349-352
Author(s):  
Hong Wei Zhao ◽  
Hong Gang Xia

Differential evolution (DE) is a population-based stochastic function minimizer (or maximizer), whose simple yet powerful and straightforward features make it very attractive for numerical optimization. However, DE is easy to trapped into local optima. In this paper, an improved differential evolution algorithm (IDE) proposed to speed the convergence rate of DE and enhance the global search of DE. The IDE employed a new mutation operation and modified crossover operation. The former can rapidly enhance the convergence of the MDE, and the latter can prevent the MDE from being trapped into the local optimum effectively. Besides, we dynamic adjust the scaling factor (F) and the crossover rate (CR), which is aimed at further improving algorithm performance. Based on several benchmark experiment simulations, the IDE has demonstrated stronger convergence and stability than original differential (DE) algorithm and other algorithms (PSO and JADE) that reported in recent literature.


2014 ◽  
Vol 602-605 ◽  
pp. 3585-3588
Author(s):  
Hong Gang Xia ◽  
Qing Zhou Wang

To efficiently enhance the global search and local search of Differential Evolution algorithm ( DE), A modified differential evolution algorithm (MDE) is proposed in this paper. The MDE and the DE are different in two aspects. The first is the MDE Algorithm use a strategy of Pitch adjustment instead of original mutation operation, this can enhance the convergence of the MDE, the second is integrate the opposed-learning operation in the crossover operation to prevent DE from being trapped into local optimum. Four test functions are adopted to make comparison with original DE, the MDE has demonstrated stronger velocity of convergence and precision of optimization than differential DE algorithm and PSO.


2014 ◽  
Vol 989-994 ◽  
pp. 2536-2539
Author(s):  
Hong Gang Xia ◽  
Qing Zhou Wang

In this paper, a modified differential evolution algorithm (MDE) developed to solve unconstrained numerical optimization problems. The MDE algorithm employed random position updating and disturbance operation to replaces the traditional mutation operation. The former can rapidly enhance the convergence of the MDE, and the latter can prevent the MDE from being trapped into the local optimum effectively. Besides, we dynamic adjust the crossover rate (CR), which is aimed at further improving algorithm performance. Based on several benchmark experiment simulations, the MDE has demonstrated stronger convergence and stability than original differential (DE) algorithm and its two improved algorithms (JADE and SaDE) that reported in recent literature.


2013 ◽  
Vol 415 ◽  
pp. 309-313
Author(s):  
Hong Gang Xia ◽  
Qing Zhou Wang

In this paper, a new opposition-based modified differential evolution algorithm (OMDE) is proposed. This algorithm integrates the opposed-learning operation with the crossover operation to enhance the convergence of the algorithm and to prevent the algorithm from being trapped into the local optimum effectively. Besides, we employed a new strategy to dynamic adjust mutation rate (MR) and crossover rate (CR), which is aimed at further improving algorithm performance. Based on several benchmark functions tested, the OMDE has demonstrated stronger convergence and stability than original differential (DE) algorithm and its two improved algorithms (JADE and SaDE) that reported in recent literature.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Wagdy Mohamed ◽  
Ali Khater Mohamed ◽  
Ehab Z. Elfeky ◽  
Mohamed Saleh

The performance of Differential Evolution is significantly affected by the mutation scheme, which attracts many researchers to develop and enhance the mutation scheme in DE. In this article, the authors introduce an enhanced DE algorithm (EDDE) that utilizes the information given by good individuals and bad individuals in the population. The new mutation scheme maintains effectively the exploration/exploitation balance. Numerical experiments are conducted on 24 test problems presented in CEC'2006, and five constrained engineering problems from the literature for verifying and analyzing the performance of EDDE. The presented algorithm showed competitiveness in some cases and superiority in other cases in terms of robustness, efficiency and quality the of the results.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuehe Zhu ◽  
Hua Wang ◽  
Jin Zhang

Since most spacecraft multiple-impulse trajectory optimization problems are complex multimodal problems with boundary constraint, finding the global optimal solution based on the traditional differential evolution (DE) algorithms becomes so difficult due to the deception of many local optima and the probable existence of a bias towards suboptimal solution. In order to overcome this issue and enhance the global searching ability, an improved DE algorithm with combined mutation strategies and boundary-handling schemes is proposed. In the first stage, multiple mutation strategies are utilized, and each strategy creates a mutant vector. In the second stage, multiple boundary-handling schemes are used to simultaneously address the same infeasible trial vector. Two typical spacecraft multiple-impulse trajectory optimization problems are studied and optimized using the proposed DE method. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed DE method efficiently overcomes the problem created by the convergence to a local optimum and obtains the global optimum with a higher reliability and convergence rate compared with some other popular evolutionary methods.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Ayda Emdadian ◽  
S. G. Ponnambalam ◽  
G. Kanagaraj

In this paper, five variants of Differential Evolution (DE) algorithms are proposed to solve the multi-echelon supply chain network optimization problem. Supply chain network composed of different stages which involves products, services and information flow between suppliers and customers, is a value-added chain that provides customers products with the quickest delivery and the most competitive price. Hence, there is a need to optimize the supply chain by finding the optimum configuration of the network in order to get a good compromise between several objectives. The supply chain problem utilized in this study is taken from literature which incorporates demand, capacity, raw-material availability, and sequencing constraints in order to maximize total profitability. The performance of DE variants has been investigated by solving three stage multi-echelon supply chain network optimization problems for twenty demand scenarios with each supply chain settings. The objective is to find the optimal alignment of procurement, production, and distribution while aiming towards maximizing profit. The results show that the proposed DE algorithm is able to achieve better performance on a set of supply chain problem with different scenarios those obtained by well-known classical GA and PSO.


Author(s):  
Wonsiri Punurai ◽  
Nantiwat Pholdee

Engineering design is one of many disciplines involving optimization problems. This chapter will introduce differential evolution (DE), as well as educate readers on an efficient adaptive differential evolution algorithm (ADEA). The ADEA is considered an effective method for complex structural optimization problems such as truss structures. First, the chapter will provide an overview on the DE and ADEA concepts. Using illustrative examples, the chapter will provide the reader with a methodology used to perform 2D and 3D truss sizing optimization. The remainder of the chapter will discuss the computational aspect of neural network assisted adaptive differential algorithm for truss optimization design. Future work can show the benefits of this adaptation to accelerate the convergence speed while using fewer structural analyses than those required by other methods.


Author(s):  
Mustafa Tuncay ◽  
Ali Haydar

Differential Evolution algorithm (DE) is a well-known nature-inspired method in evolutionary computations scope. This paper adds some new features to DE algorithm and proposes a novel method focusing on ranking technique. The proposed method is named as Dominance-Based Differential Evolution, called DBDE from this point on, which is the improved version of the standard DE algorithm. The suggested DBDE applies some changes on the selection operator of the Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm and modifies the crossover and initialization phases to improve the performance of DE. The dominance ranks are used in the selection phase of DBDE to be capable of selecting higher quality solutions. A dominance-rank for solution X is the number of solutions dominating X. Moreover, some vectors called target vectors are used through the selection process. Effectiveness and performance of the proposed DBDE method is experimentally evaluated using six well-known benchmarks, provided by CEC2009, plus two additional test problems namely Kursawe and Fonseca & Fleming. The evaluation process emphasizes on specific bi-objective real-valued optimization problems reported in literature. Likewise, the Inverted Generational Distance (IGD) metric is calculated for the obtained results to measure the performance of algorithms. To follow up the evaluation rules obeyed by all state-of-the-art methods, the fitness evaluation function is called 300.000 times and 30 independent runs of DBDE is carried out. Analysis of the obtained results indicates that the performance of the proposed algorithm (DBDE) in terms of convergence and robustness outperforms the majority of state-of-the-art methods reported in the literature


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingfeng Ding ◽  
Guoxin Zheng

To avoid immature convergence and tune the selection pressure in the differential evolution (DE) algorithm, a new differential evolution algorithm based on cellular automata and chaotic local search (CLS) or ccDE is proposed. To balance the exploration and exploitation tradeoff of differential evolution, the interaction among individuals is limited in cellular neighbors instead of controlling parameters in the canonical DE. To improve the optimizing performance of DE, the CLS helps by exploring a large region to avoid immature convergence in the early evolutionary stage and exploiting a small region to refine the final solutions in the later evolutionary stage. What is more, to improve the convergence characteristics and maintain the population diversity, the binomial crossover operator in the canonical DE may be instead by the orthogonal crossover operator without crossover rate. The performance of ccDE is widely evaluated on a set of 14 bound constrained numerical optimization problems compared with the canonical DE and several DE variants. The simulation results show that ccDE has better performances in terms of convergence rate and solution accuracy than other optimizers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document