Experimental Study of Well Deviation Correction Model in Deviated and Horizontal Wells Production Profile

2012 ◽  
Vol 490-495 ◽  
pp. 2205-2209
Author(s):  
Jun Feng Liu ◽  
Hai Min Guo

There are big difference of fluid flow patterns between horizontal wells and vertical wells, so the current interpretation models of production logging multiphase flow in vertical wells are not suitable for data interpretation in highly deviated and horizontal wells. In this paper, firstly, the two-phase flow (oil-water and gas-water) simulation experiments have been carried out in large-diameter (0.124 meter internal diameter) uphill, horizontal and downhill Plexiglas pipe with practical production logging tools. Secondly, based on the conclusions of fluid flow mechanism from experimental data analysis, and considering the affecting factors (i.e. Logging tool and well deviation ), we have obtained slip velocity model after well deviation correction in highly deviated and horizontal wells, which have been corrected by the mature interpretation models. Finally, this proposed method has been proved correct and feasible through the experimental data validation.

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dariusz Mikielewicz ◽  
Michał Gliński ◽  
Jan Wajs

Experimental and theoretical study of dryout in annular flow in small diameter channels In the paper the experimental analysis of dryout in small diameter channels is presented. The investigations were carried out in vertical pipes of internal diameter equal to 1.15 mm and 2.3 mm. Low-boiling point fluids such as SES36 and R123 were examined. The modern experimental techniques were applied to record liquid film dryout on the wall, among the others the infrared camera. On the basis of experimental data an empirical correlation for predictions of critical heat flux was proposed. It shows a good agreement with experimental data within the error band of 30%. Additionally, a unique approach to liquid film dryout modeling in annular flow was presented. It led to the development of the three-equation model based on consideration of liquid mass balance in the film, a two-phase mixture in the core and gas. The results of experimental validation of the model exhibit improvement in comparison to other models from literature.


Author(s):  
V. Yu. Kravets ◽  
D. I. Hurov

This paper presents and analyzes experimental data on the total thermal resistances of two-phase miniature thermosyphons with nanofluids; the geometric parameters of the thermosyphons for all experimental samples are identical: total length 700 mm, internal diameter 5 mm. The following nanofluids used as heat carriers are: aqueous nanofluid based on carbon nanotubes, aqueous nanofluid based on synthetic diamond, and aqueous nanofluid based on amorphous carbon. Much attention is also paid to the influence of the filling ratio on the heat transfer characteristics of the thermosyphons. The influence of filling ratio and types of nanofluid on the performance of miniature closed two-phase thermosyphons is demonstrated.


Author(s):  
Francesco D’Auria ◽  
Marco Lanfredini

V&V constitutes a powerful framework to demonstrate the capability of computational tools in several technological areas. Passing V&V requirements is a needed step before applications. Let’s focus hereafter to the area of (transient) Nuclear Thermal-hydraulic (NTH) and let’s identify V1 and V2 as acronyms for Verification and Validation, respectively. Now, V1 is performed within NTH according to the best available techniques and may not suffer of important deficiencies if compared with other technological areas. This is not the case of V2. Three inherent limitations shall be mentioned in the case of Validation in NTH: 1. Validation implies comparison with experimental data: available experimental data cover a (very) small fraction of the parameter range space expected in applications of the codes; this can be easily seen if one considers data in large diameter pipe, high velocity and high pressure or high power and power density. Noticeably, the scaling issue must be addressed in the framework of V2 which may result in controversial findings. 2. Water is at the center of the attention: the physical properties of water are known to a reasonable extent as well as large variations in values of quantities like density or various derivatives are expected within the range of variation of pressure inside application fields. Although not needed for current validation purposes (e.g. validation ranges may not include a situation of critical pressure and large heat flux) physically inconsistent values predicted by empirical correlations outside validation ranges, shall not be tolerated. 3. Occurrence of complex situations like transition from two-phase critical flow to ‘Bernoulli-flow’ (e.g. towards the end of blow-down) and from film boiling to nucleate boiling, possibly crossing the minimum film boiling temperature (e.g. during reflood). Therefore, whatever can be mentioned as classical V2 is not or cannot be performed in NTH. So, the idea of the present paper is to add a component to the V&V. This component, or step in the process, is called ‘Consistency with Reality’, or with the expected phenomenological evidence. The new component may need to be characterized in some cases and is indicated by the letter ‘C’. Then, the V&V becomes V&V&C. The purpose of the paper is to clarify the motivations at the bases of the V&V&C.


Author(s):  
Francesco D’Auria ◽  
Marco Lanfredini

V&V constitutes a powerful framework to demonstrate the capability of computational tools in several technological areas. Passing V&V requirements is a needed step before applications. Let’s focus hereafter to the area of (transient) Nuclear Thermal-hydraulic (NTH) and let’s identify V1 and V2 as acronyms for Verification and Validation, respectively. Now, V1 is performed within NTH according to the best available techniques and may not suffer of important deficiencies if compared with other technological areas. This is not the case of V2. Three inherent limitations shall be mentioned in the case of Validation in NTH: 1. Validation implies comparison with experimental data: available experimental data cover a (very) small fraction of the parameter range space expected in applications of the codes; this can be easily seen if one considers data in large diameter pipe, high velocity and high pressure or high power and power density. Noticeably, the scaling issue must be addressed in the framework of V2 which may result in controversial findings. 2. Water is at the center of the attention: the physical properties of water are known to a reasonable extent as well as large variations in values of quantities like density or various derivatives are expected within the range of variation of pressure inside application fields. Although not needed for current validation purposes (e.g. validation ranges may not include a situation of critical pressure and large heat flux) physically inconsistent values predicted by empirical correlations outside validation ranges, shall not be tolerated. 3. Occurrence of complex situations like transition from two-phase critical flow to ‘Bernoulli-flow’ (e.g. towards the end of blow-down) and from film boiling to nucleate boiling, possibly crossing the minimum film boiling temperature (e.g. during reflood). Therefore, whatever can be mentioned as classical V2 is not or cannot be performed in NTH. So, the idea of the present paper is to add a component to the V&V. This component, or step in the process, is called ‘Consistency with Reality’, or with the expected phenomenological evidence. The new component may need to be characterized in some cases and is indicated by the letter ‘C’. Then, the V&V becomes V&V&C. The purpose of the paper is to clarify the motivations at the bases of the V&V&C.


1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang-Biao Ouyang ◽  
Nicholas Petalas ◽  
Sepehr Arbabi ◽  
Donald E. Schroeder ◽  
Khalid Aziz

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 68-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong'en Dou ◽  
Changchun Chen ◽  
Yu Wen Chang ◽  
Yanjun Fang ◽  
Xinbin Chen ◽  
...  

Summary Intercampo oil field, which contains unconsolidated reservoirs driven by edge water and bottom water, is characterized by heavy oil with mid-high permeability and high oil saturation. The three classical models of the Arps model were applied in 13 horizontal and vertical wells in the oil field; also, the paper introduces two models that are not widely applied for decline analysis and forecasting in the wells. Decline features between vertical and horizontal wells were compared. The results accord well with the actual data from the oil field. The authors point out that these decline analysis models are applicable not only for vertical wells but also for horizontal wells. The authors would like to emphasize that four decline models discussed in the paper. In regard to screening and comparison of decline analysis models, this paper illustrates how to select and use a model, as well as the model's application conditions and their features. The screened models are recommended for production performance analysis of wells, reservoirs and oil fields. Introduction Existing decline curve analysis techniques, which include three Arps models (exponential, hyperbolic, and harmonic, 1945), and the Fetkovich model (1980), are derived empirically; the Arps models are still the preferred method for forecasting oil production and proven reserve. These methods have played a very important role in the exploration and development of oil fields worldwide (Arps 1945, Arps 1956, Fetkovich et al. 1980, Fetkovich et al. 1987, Fetkovich et al. 1996). Gentry and McCray (1978) presented a method to define decline curve. They claimed their equation might be superior to the Arps equations by defining certain decline curves. However, the model was derived from the hyperbolic model of the Arps model; their equation has a parameter qi of initial production rate computed by the Darcy Law. This means that the application of their method requires more parameters, such as relative permeability curve, radius of drainage, formation thickness, reservoir pressure at external drainage radius, and well bore terminal pressure. On this point, in their example the extrapolation with their model is not seen because the method is not a pure production-time relationship. Furthermore, use of this model to extrapolate future production is restricted by the data requirements. Li and Horne (2002, 2005) developed an analytical model, called the Li-Horne model, based on fluid flow mechanisms. The model was developed under the spontaneous water imbibition condition. Li and Horne also thought it difficult to predict which Arps equation a reservoir would follow. However, they made a conceptual error in their reasoning of the Arps models. In fact, we need to judge the decline type before using the Arps model to make production decline analysis. Li and Horne used only two special cases of decline exponent, n = 0 and 1, then compared the exponential model and harmonic model with any models. Hence, we think Li and Horne's comparison of several oil fields is not meaningful in cases where they did not get a concrete decline exponent n. When the Li-Horne model was applied to the actual oil fields, the values of a0 and b0 were regressed from the actual oilfield data, but not the calculation values from their equations. Because the models constants of the Arps and Li-Horne model regress from the actual oil fields, they include different reservoir type and fluid flow information (high permeability, low permeability, naturally fractured low permeability, complex, fault reservoir, etc.; single flow and multiphase flow, etc.). Therefore, the decline analysis models based on purely statistical models do not have any association with fluid flow mechanism, reservoir types, fluids characteristics, steady or unsteady flow, and single or multiphase flow. We are inclined to refer to this as an empirical rather than an analytical model. The other two decline analysis models introduced in this paper, the Orstrand-Weng model (Arps 1945, Weng 1992) and the T model, were both proposed for predicting oil field production in China during the 1980s. The main purpose of this paper is to compare application conditions and results among four models: Arps, Orstrand-Weng, T and the Li-Horne model.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document