The Critical Care Nurse’s Role in the Noninvasive Assessment of Myocardial Reperfusion

1990 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-118
Author(s):  
Marlene R. Kleven

Thrombolytic therapy is rapidly becoming the standard of care for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The goal of thrombolytic therapy is clot dissolution in the infarct artery that results in re-establishing blood flow to affected ischemic myocardium. Confirmation of the occurrence of reperfusion can only be established by direct visualization of the coronary artery. Clinical reperfusion markers (dysrhythmias, chest pain relief, ST segment normalization, CK peak values) have also been associated with myocardial reperfusion. These markers are noninvasive and are routinely relied on in the clinical setting. However, a review of the literature reveals that the noninvasive reperfusion markers individually lack reliability in successfully predicting reperfusion status. Because of the importance of establishing the success of reperfusion therapy early in the treatment of AMI, it is critical that the nurse at the bedside be aware of the criteria that can be established to improve the reliability of the reperfusion markers and their limitations.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-34
Author(s):  
Diego Echeverri- Marín ◽  
Cristhian Felipe Ramirez Ramos ◽  
Andrés Miranda-Arboleda ◽  
Gustavo Castilla-Agudelo ◽  
Clara Saldarriaga-Giraldo

Acute myocardial infarction is the leading cause of death in the world and the electrocardiogram remains the diagnostic tool for determining an acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. In spite of this, only half of the patients present classic electrocardiogram findings compatible with the ST-elevation infarction criteria. There is a spectrum of electrocardiographic findings that may reflect a phenomenon of acute coronary occlusion, which should be promptly recognized by the clinician to offer early reperfusion therapy.


1997 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig P Juergens ◽  
Robert J Whitbourn ◽  
Alan C Yeung ◽  
Stephen N Oesterle

The use of thrombolytic therapy has been widely accepted for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Despite improving mortality, thrombolytic therapy may be contraindicated in many patients presenting with myocardial infarction and is associated with a small, yet significant risk of hemorrhagic sequelae. This article outlines the rationale behind reperfusion therapy, the use of pharmacological thrombolysis and the role of adjunctive angioplasty. The potential advantages of a therapeutic strategy of primary angioplasty, instead of thrombolysis, are discussed. These include anatomical definition, risk stratification, reduced recurrent ischemia, enhanced coronary perfusion and improved coronary patency. The randomized trials in which primary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy were compared are reviewed. We conclude that angioplasty results in a reduction of short-term mortality and nonfatal reinfarction and therefore advocate the routine use of coronary angioplasty as a primary reperfusion strategy for acute myocardial infarction. The potential limitations of primary angioplasty in the community hospital setting are discussed. Finally, we examine the roles of adjunctive mechanical (e.g. stents) and pharmacological (e.g. Abciximab) means of further enhancing outcomes after primary angioplasty.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document