scholarly journals A rare cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain in children: complex regional pain syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Niroshini Ekneligoda ◽  
Guwani Liyanage
2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 166-173
Author(s):  
Shahana Akhter Rahman ◽  
Mujammel Haque ◽  
Mohammed Mahbubul Islam

Musculoskeletal pain is a frequent complaint of children, is the most common presenting problem of children referred to pediatric rheumatology clinics. Chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain in children is responsible for substantial personal impacts and societal costs, but it has not been intensively or systematically researched. The majority of musculoskeletal pain complaints in children are benign in nature and attributable to trauma, overuse, and normal variations in skeletal growth. There is a subset of children in whom chronic pain complaints develop that persist in the absence of physical and laboratory abnormalities including growing Pain, juvenile fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome. During recent years studies of the epidemiology, etiology and rehabilitation of pain and pain-associated disability in children have revealed a large prevalence of clinically relevant pain, and have emphasized the need for early recognition and intervention.Bangladesh J Child Health 2016; VOL 40 (3) :166-173


Author(s):  
Gavin Clunie ◽  
Nick Wilkinson ◽  
Elena Nikiphorou ◽  
Deepak R. Jadon

The Oxford Handbook of Rheumatology 4th edition, has been extensively updated to thoroughly review aspects of musculoskeletal pain. Pain pathophysiology is reviewed. Chronic pain and fibromyalgia in adults and in children and adolescents is dealt with in detail. The reader is advised to cross reference from this chapter to Chapters 1–3 in the Handbook, where regional musculoskeletal pain conditions are listed and reviewed. In localized pain syndromes, the chapter has an overview of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), which is not infrequently encountered in rheumatology and musculoskeletal clinics. Included in detail for this edition, is the assessment and management of pain in children, which is a highly specialized clinical area of medicine and will be of use to the adult rheumatologist and general practitioner as well as paediatric specialists. Readers should cross reference to Chapter 23 on medications, for ‘pain medications’ in the Handbook


2021 ◽  
pp. 22-28
Author(s):  
D. Kh. Khaibullina ◽  
Yu. N. Maksimov ◽  
F. I. Devlikamova

Treatment of musculoskeletal back pain is an essential problem for doctors of many specialties, including neurologists. In some cases, the chronic course of the pain syndrome is accompanied with complaints and clinical manifestations characteristic of neuropathic pain in the absence of significant damage to the neural structures, which is explained by the mechanism of central sensitization. In this case, there may be diagnostic errors in determining the nature of the pain, which entails inadequate therapy that does not lead to the desired result.The presented clinical case is devoted to the treatment of exacerbation of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Treatment of the patient for a herniated disc complicated by radiculopathy, carried out earlier, did not lead to the desired result due to the inconsistency of the diagnosis, inadequacy and lack of systematic therapy. Based on the analysis of the physical and paraclinical studies, the diagnosis was changed to « Lower back pain. Myofascial pain syndrome. Toxic polyneuropathy. Herniated disc LV-SI. Residual radiculopathy S1». Therapeutic measures were adjusted in accordance with the diagnosis. In order to relieve the pain syndrome at the first stage, a combined drug Neurodiclovit, a muscle relaxant, a drug of the SYSADOA group, soft tissue techniques of manual therapy, phonophoresis with glucocorticosteroids, and cognitive behavioral therapy were used. The assessment of the patient’s condition carried out after 7 days showed the effectiveness of the treatment, which allowed to cancel the use of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, a muscle relaxant and a glucocorticosteroid. At the post-treatment stage, the patient was prescribed a combination of B vitamins (Neuromultivitis) and therapeutic gymnastics, as well as continued therapy with a slowacting symptomatic agent and non-drug treatment methods. Relief of the pain syndrome in the absence of adverse events confirmed the adequacy and effectiveness of the therapy.The presented clinical case demonstrates the importance of placing emphasis at the stage of diagnosis, taking into account the data of clinical and paraclinical research methods, and also illustrates the possibility of successful conservative therapy for exacerbation of chronic musculoskeletal pain in the practice of a neurologist.


2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P173
Author(s):  
K Mikešová ◽  
Y Šulcová ◽  
M Vránová ◽  
J Tuková ◽  
P Šcerbanovská ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Robert J. Barth

Abstract Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a controversial, ambiguous, unreliable, and unvalidated concept that, for these very reasons, has been justifiably ignored in the “AMA Guides Library” that includes the AMAGuides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), the AMA Guides Newsletter, and other publications in this suite. But because of the surge of CRPS-related medicolegal claims and the mission of the AMA Guides to assist those who adjudicate such claims, a discussion of CRPS is warranted, especially because of what some believe to be confusing recommendations regarding causation. In 1994, the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) introduced a newly invented concept, CRPS, to replace the concepts of reflex sympathetic dystrophy (replaced by CRPS I) and causalgia (replaced by CRPS II). An article in the November/December 1997 issue of The Guides Newsletter introduced CRPS and presciently recommended that evaluators avoid the IASP protocol in favor of extensive differential diagnosis based on objective findings. A series of articles in The Guides Newsletter in 2006 extensively discussed the shortcomings of CRPS. The AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, notes that the inherent lack of injury-relatedness for the nonvalidated concept of CRPS creates a dilemma for impairment evaluators. Focusing on impairment evaluation and not on injury-relatedness would greatly simplify use of the AMA Guides.


2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-5
Author(s):  
James B. Talmage ◽  
Jay Blaisdell

Abstract Physicians use a variety of methodologies within the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition, to rate nerve injuries depending on the type of injury and location of the nerve. Traumatic injuries that cause impairment to the peripheral or brachial plexus nerves are rated using Section 15.4e, Peripheral Nerve and Brachial Plexus Impairment, for upper extremities and Section 16.4c, Peripheral Nerve Rating Process, for lower extremities. Verifiable nerve lesions that incite the symptoms of complex regional pain syndrome, type II (similar to the former concept of causalgia), also are rated in these sections. Nerve entrapments, which are not isolated traumatic events, are rated using the methodology in Section 15.4f, Entrapment Neuropathy. Type I complex regional pain syndrome is rated using Section 15.5, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome for upper extremities or Section 16.5, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome for lower extremities. The method for grading the sensory and motor deficits is analogous to the method described in previous editions of AMA Guides. Rating the permanent impairment of the peripheral nerves or brachial plexus is similar to the methodology used in the diagnosis-based impairment scheme with the exceptions that the physical examination grade modifier is never used to adjust the default rating and the names of individual nerves or plexus trunks, as opposed to the names of diagnoses, appear in the far left column of the rating grids.


2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-3, 9-12
Author(s):  
Robert J. Barth ◽  
Tom W. Bohr

Abstract From the previous issue, this article continues a discussion of the potentially confusing aspects of the diagnostic formulation for complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS-1) proposed by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), the relevance of these issues for a proposed future protocol, and recommendations for clinical practice. IASP is working to resolve the contradictions in its approach to CRPS-1 diagnosis, but it continues to include the following criterion: “[c]ontinuing pain, which is disproportionate to any inciting event.” This language only perpetuates existing issues with current definitions, specifically the overlap between the IASP criteria for CRPS-1 and somatoform disorders, overlap with the guidelines for malingering, and self-contradiction with respect to the suggestion of injury-relatedness. The authors propose to overcome the last of these by revising the criterion: “[c]omplaints of pain in the absence of any identifiable injury that could credibly account for the complaints.” Similarly, the overlap with somatoform disorders could be reworded: “The possibility of a somatoform disorder has been thoroughly assessed, with the results of that assessment failing to produce any consistencies with a somatoform scenario.” The overlap with malingering could be addressed in this manner: “The possibility of malingering has been thoroughly assessed, with the results of that assessment failing to produce any consistencies with a malingering scenario.” The article concludes with six recommendations, and a sidebar discusses rating impairment for CRPS-1 (with explicit instructions not to use the pain chapter for this purpose).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document