Abstract
Background
Despite the life-saving work they perform, community health workers (CHWs) have long been subject to global debate about their remuneration. There is now, however, an emerging consensus that CHWs should be paid. As the discussion evolves from whether to financially remunerate CHWs to how to do so, there is an urgent need to better understand the types of CHW payment models and their implications.
Methods
This study examines the legal framework on CHW compensation in five countries: Brazil, Ghana, Nigeria, Rwanda, and South Africa. In order to map the characteristics of each approach, a standardized questionnaire was developed and targeted at local law firms. The questionnaire covered legal structures and requirements for compensation of CHWs, CHW compensation mechanisms, CHW legal protections and benefits, and alignment of national CHW policies with global guidelines.
Results
The five countries profiled represent possible archetypes for CHW compensation: Brazil (public), Ghana (volunteer-based), Nigeria (private), Rwanda (cooperatives with performance based incentives) and South Africa (hybrid public/private). Advantages and disadvantages of each model with respect to (i) CHWs, in terms of financial protection, and (ii) the public sector, in terms of ease of implementation, are outlined.
Conclusions
While a strong legal framework does not necessarily translate into high-quality implementation, it is the first necessary step. While certain approaches to CHW compensation - particularly public-sector or hybrid models with public sector wage floors - best institutionalize recommended CHW protections, political will and long-term financing often remain obstacles. Removing ecosystem barriers - such as multilateral and bilateral restrictions on the payment of salaries - can help governments institutionalize CHW payment.