scholarly journals YHWH and the God of philosophical theology

2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 677-699
Author(s):  
J W Gericke

In popular orthodox Christian philosophical theology, it is often taken for granted that the divine philosophised about is none other than the Hebrew deity YHWH himself. Moreover , it is often assumed that the Old  Testament depicts YHWH as being, inter alia, single, omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, and eternal. Now while it is to be admitted that there are indeed depictions of YHWH in the Old Testament in which his profile might be thought of as corresponding more or less to the popular philosophical ideal, it is also true that there are many representations that contradict it. In this article, the author looks at how the popular profile of  YHWH in the Old Testament as reconstructed by some philosophical theologians claiming to be ‘biblical’  is deconstructed when it is juxtaposed with alternative renderings of the divine in the same texts.

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 283-307
Author(s):  
Vyacheslav Golovko

The article analyzes the semantic functions of the Old Testament and New Testament texts in the story Polosa (Stripe), a landmark for the literature of the final stage of Russian classical realism, written by Lydia Nelidova, whose work has not yet been the subject of special study. The relevance of the research is defined by the rather high role of Nelidova’s creative activity in the literary process of the last decades of the 19th century. Biblical references, quotations, reminiscences, allusions and paraphrases, which determine the sequence of the text that creates the semantic field of the work, perform the dominant ideological and aesthetic function in creating the story as a “non-trivial new text.” Nelidova’s innovation is based on the active use of Dostoevsky’s literary traditions (orientation toward the idea of “finding a person in a person” and the “living life” constant). As a “semantic whole,” Nelidova’s story is organized by the internal dialogue of three concepts of “life.” One of them is based on the Christian teaching, the other on an appeal to science, and the third – on the idea of life as an all-dominating objective force. The author's moral and aesthetic position, which confirms the biblical concept of life, is objectified in the logic of semantic actualization of the gospel truths associated with the interpretations of the eternal theme of the struggle between good and evil, ways of human salvation, overcoming the sin of thoughts, pride and selfishness. The artistic historicism of the story, manifested in the coverage of the social contradictions of the post-reform Russia, sanctions the author’s intentionality associated with the assertion of universal human spiritual, moral and humanistic ideals. Formation of meaning at the level of the author’s intentionality and at the level of meaning generation is carried out by activating the intertextual, hypertextual and contextual functionality of biblical pretexts and traditions of Orthodox Christian culture. It is implemented in the process of illuminating conflicts of time and characters' psychological disclosure. Intertextual reminiscences and quotes from biblical texts, the works of Christian ascetic writers and patristic sources aim to form the semantic core of the main character’s narrative and implement the principle of intersemantization of meanings enshrined in sacred texts. Thanks to these texts, they manifest in the thoughts of a character seeking a way out of spiritual and moral impasse. The author's artistic experience stimulated the formation of the Dostoevsky school in the literature of the last decades of the 19th century. The author's quote-based thinking anticipates the narrative strategies that will become characteristic of the artistic discourse of subsequent historical and literary eras.


2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-153
Author(s):  
Jonathan C. Rutledge

A Philosophical Theology of the Old Testament: A Historical, Experimental, Comparative and Analytic Perspective, by Jaco Gericke. Routledge Publishing, 2020. Pp. viii + 163. $155.00 (hardcover).


Author(s):  
John A. L. Lee

The Septuagint has made a major contribution to the Greek Orthodox Christian liturgy, but this is an aspect of its reception history that has hitherto received little scholarly attention. In this chapter, aspects of the contribution are examined under five headings, ‘The Psalms’, ‘The Odes’, ‘Old Testament Readings’, ‘Quotations and Allusions’, and ‘Vocabulary’. The question of how the Septuagint came to play this role in Christian worship, and especially whether it reflects prior Jewish use of Greek Scripture in the liturgy of the synagogue, is considered in a final section, ‘Origins’, surveying the information available and current opinions and debates in this difficult field.


Author(s):  
Elina Kahla

This chapter addresses church-state collaboration in the context of ‘spiritual national defence’; it compares different views represented in cultural productions on the tragedy of the submarine Kursk, that which sank in the Barents Sea, on 12 August 2000. It suggests that the Russian secular leadership’s reluctance to deal with the management of the past, especially concerning the punishment of Stalinist oppressors, is compensated by glorifying victims – here, the seamen of the Kursk – having died on duty, as martyrs. Тhe glorification of martyrs derives from Old Testament theology of blood sacrifice (2 Moses, 24:8), and makes it possible to commemorate Muslim martyrs together with Orthodox Christian ones. Some theologians have claimed that Russia had needed these sacrifices to spiritually wake up in the post-atheist vacuum of values, and that the Russian people had to repent for having abandoned their forefathers’ Christian faith. In this line of apologetics of blood sacrifices and need to repent, the New Testament’s promise of Jesus’s complete purgation and redemption of sin through perfect sacrifice (Matt. 26:28) is not mentioned. My reading elaborates on the commemorative album Everlasting Lamp of Kursk by (then) Hegumen Mitrofan (Badanin) (2010), as well as on the drama film Kursk by Danish director Thomas Vinterberg (2018), whose film illustrates pan-European visions, based implicitly on the New Testament promise.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-95
Author(s):  
Paulus Kunto Baskoro

ABSTRACTThe intertestamental period is a Protestant term, while the deuterocanonical period is a Catholic and Orthodox Christian term to refer to the time gap between the period covered by the Hebrew Bible or "Old Testament" and the period covered by the Christian "New Testament". Traditionally, this period is thought to cover about four hundred years, from the time of Malachi's ministry (420 BC) to the advent of John the Baptist in the early 1st century AD, a period that is almost the same as the Second Temple period (530 BC to 70 M). It is known by members of the Protestant community as "400 Silent Years" (400 Silent Years) because it is believed to be a time period in which God did not reveal anything new to His people.However, it is undeniable that in the intertestamental times there are many parts of history that are sometimes questioned and are being sought for truth. Because after all, even though 400 years of God's silence did not speak to humans, the world's history continues. Although the context is mostly in the form of ruling kingdoms. And religious history also continues, with a tradition built. Among them about the journey of the concept of the priesthood in tradition in Israel as the concept of worship for the Jews. The question which is still being debated and becoming a conversation is First, what are the duties and responsibilities of the high priest during the intertestamental period? Second, are priesthood rules in the Torah still enforced during the intertestamental period, or are there changes and adjustments?Through this paper, the author will give a little understanding of what happened during the intertestamental period in connection with the priestly ministry in Israel. ABSTRAKPeriode intertestamental (bahasa Inggris: Intertestamental period) merupakan suatu istilah Protestan, sedangkan periode deuterokanonikal (bahasa Inggris: deuterocanonical period) adalah istilah Katolik dan Kristen Ortodoks untuk menyebut kesenjangan waktu antara periode yang dicakup oleh Alkitab Ibrani atau "Perjanjian Lama" dan periode yang dicakup oleh "Perjanjian Baru" orang Kristen. Secara tradisional, periode ini dianggap mencakup kira-kira empat ratus tahun, sejak masa pelayanan Maleakhi (420 SM) sampai kepada munculnya Yohanes Pembaptis pada awal abad ke-1 Masehi, suatu periode yang hampir sama dengan periode Bait Suci Kedua (530 SM hingga 70 M). Dikenal oleh anggota komunitas Protestan sebagai "400 Tahun Sunyi" (400 Silent Years) karena diyakini merupakan kurun waktu di mana Allah tidak menyatakan apa-apa yang baru kepada umat-Nya.Namun tidak bisa dipungkiri bahwa dimasa-masa intertestamental banyak sekali bagian-bagian sejarah yang terkadang banyak yang dipertanyakan dan sedang dicari kebenarannya. Sebab bagaimanapun juga meskipun 400 tahun masa Allah diam tidak berbicara kepada manusia, manusia sejarah dunia tetap berjalan. Meskipun konteksnya banyak berupa kerajaan-kerajaan yang berkuasa. Dan sejarah keagamaan juga tetap berjalan, dengan sebuah tradisi-tradisi yang dibangun. Diantaranya tentang pejalanan konsep keimaman dalam tradisi di Israel sebagai konsep penyembahan bagi orang-orang Yahudi. Pertanyaan yang masih menjadi perdebatan dan menjadi perbincangan adalah Pertama, bagaimanakah tugas dan tanggung jawab imam besar pada masa intertestamental?  Kedua, apakah aturan keimaman dalam Taurat tetap ditegakkan pada masa intertestamental, ataukah ada perubahan dan penyesuaian?Lewat makalah ini, penulis akan sedikit memberikan pemahaman tentang apa yang terjadi di masa intertestamental sehubungan dengan perjalanan pelayanan keimaman di Israel.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document