scholarly journals Laparoscopic resection for middle and low rectal cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byung-Kwon Ahn ◽  
Kwang-Kuk Park ◽  
Seung-Hyun Lee ◽  
Sung-Uhn Baek
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Resection ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer

scholarly journals Robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal cancer: Initial experiences from 15 consecutive cases at Cho Ray Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Viet Trung Lam ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Laparoscopic Resection ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Robotic Assisted Surgery

Abstract Introduction: Conventional laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer has several challenges regarding the technique issues such as a limited range of motion instruments. With the advantages, Robotic-assisted surgery has resolved this problems compared with the conventional laparoscopic surgery because it’s dexterity could improve the range of motion instruments. To evaluate the short-term and early oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal cancer. Material and Methods: Prospective study to describe one consecutive series of robotic-assisted laparoscopic resection for low rectal cancer at Department of Digestive Surgery of Cho Ray hospital. Results: Between October 2017 and June 2018, robotic-assisted laparoscopic resection with total mesorectal excision has performed on 15 consecutive patients with rectal cancer at Cho Ray hospital. The mean age was 50. Male/ female ratio was 2.75/1. The types of procedures performed were: 13 low anterior resections (LAR), 1 intersphincteric resection with coloanal anastomosis, and 1 abdominoperineal resection (APR). The overall mean operation time was 240 minutes. None of the cases was converted to open procedure. Mean harvested lymph nodes were 12. There was no surgical morbidity or mortality. On the postoperative day 1 and 2, mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores were 3.5. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 7.5 days. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic resection for low rectal cancer is a feasible and safe procedure with acceptable oncological results.

Laparoscopic resection for low rectal cancer: evaluation of oncological efficacy

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 1143-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diarmaid C. Moran ◽  
Dara O. Kavanagh ◽  
Emmeline Nugent ◽  
Niall Swan ◽  
Emmanuel Eguare ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Resection ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer

scholarly journals Effect of preservation of Denonvilliers’ fascia during laparoscopic resection for mid-low rectal cancer on protection of male urinary and sexual functions

Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (24) ◽  
pp. e3925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Bo Wei ◽  
Jia-Feng Fang ◽  
Zong-Heng Zheng ◽  
Bo Wei ◽  
Jiang-Long Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Resection ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer

Verbesserung der Behandlungsstrategie für Low Rectal Cancer: Ergebnisse der prospektiven MERCURY II Studie

2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (08) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Stelzner ◽  
J Straßburg ◽  
N Battersby ◽  
P How ◽  
N West ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer

OUTCOME OF SPHINCTER PRESERVING RECTAL RESECTION FOR LOW RECTAL CANCER

2017 ◽  
pp. 36-40
Author(s):  
Vinh Quy Truong ◽  
Anh Vu Pham ◽  
Quang Thuu Le
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Low Anterior Resection ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Anal Verge ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Central Hospital ◽  
Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Pull Through ◽  
Stage T1

Purpose: To evaluate the functional outcome of sphincter-preserving rectal resection for low rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: From April 2009 to January 2016, there are 52 patients who underwent sphincter-preserving rectal resection with total mesorectal excision with low rectal cancer (<6cm from the anal verge) at Hue Central Hospital, Hue, Vietnam. Results: the average age 62.7 ± 12.8, the distance of tumor from anal verge include four group (≤ 3cm 1.9%; 3 to ≤ 4cm 17.3%; 4 to ≤ 5cm 34.6%; > 5 cm). T stage T1/ T2/T3: 1.9%/28.8%/69.2%. The following time is 33.8 ± 18.9 month. Overall recurrence was 13/18(27.1%), local recurrence was 5 (10.4%). Total survival was 40.5 ± 2.9 month. Technique: intersphincteric preservation 14 (26.9%), low anterior resection 17 (32.7%) and pull-through procedure 21 (40.4%). The distance of anatomosis from anal verge: from 1 to ≤ 2 cm:14 (26.9%); from 2 to ≤ 3cm: 21 (40.4%); from 3 to ≤ 4 cm: 17 (32.7%). Bowels movement of 3 month: 4.7 ± 3.2 and 12th month: 2.7 ± 1.6 (p< 0.01). Conclusions: Sphincterpreserving rectal resection using may provide a good continence and oncologic safety. The patients are acceptable with the results of functional outcomes. Key words: Low rectal cancer, sphincter-preserving

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document