scholarly journals Catastrophic failure of a low profile metal-backed glenoid component after total shoulder arthroplasty

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 121 ◽  
Author(s):  
GregoryA Hoy ◽  
CarleyB Vuillermin ◽  
MarkE Trump ◽  
ShaneA Barwood
Author(s):  
Thuc-Quyen D. Nguyen ◽  
James Guido DiStefano ◽  
Andrew Y. Park ◽  
Gerd Diederichs ◽  
Jenni M. Buckley ◽  
...  

The reverse design of the total shoulder arthroplasty has been utilized for elderly patients with severely degenerated glenohumoral joints that are rotator cuff deficient. One of the most common causes of failure in shoulder arthroplasty involves loosening or catastrophic failure of the glenoid component. Such problems can be related to suboptimal fixation due to bone loss from fractures, severe degenerative changes and from previous failed arthroplasty surgery [1]. This emphasizes the need to secure the glenoid component with sound screw purchase beyond the glenoid vault. However, such fixation can often be tenuous as scapula bone quality is heterogeneous with a wide variation across short distances [2, 3]. Moreover, it can be difficult to identify regions with the best bone stock intraoperatively. This often requires multiple passes with the drill, which leads to further bone loss and potential decreased screw purchase. Thus, it is important for the surgeon to have a firm understanding of scapular anatomy with potential screw trajectories in mind.


2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (24) ◽  
pp. 2205-2212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasios Papadonikolakis ◽  
Moni Blazej Neradilek ◽  
Frederick A Matsen

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Castagna ◽  
Raffaele Garofalo

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSR) has been shown to generate good to excellent results for patients with osteoarthritis and a functioning rotator cuff. Many studies have reported that the glenoid component loosening and failure remain the most common long-term complication of total shoulder arthroplasty. The approach to glenoid component is critical because a surgeon should consider patient-specific anatomy, preserving bone stock and joint line restoration, for a good and durable shoulder function. Over the years, different glenoid design and materials have been tried in various configurations. These include cemented polyethylene, uncemented metal-backed and hybrid implants. Although advances in biomechanics, design and tribology have improved our understanding of the glenoid, the journey of the glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty has not yet reached its final destination. This article attempts to describe the evolution of the glenoid component in anatomic TSR and current practice.


2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 2860-2866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo M. Suero ◽  
Musa Citak ◽  
Darrick Lo ◽  
Aaron J. Krych ◽  
Edward V. Craig ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document