scholarly journals Ophthalmomyiasis Externa Caused by Oestrus ovis

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (01) ◽  
pp. 043-044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahesh Kumar Shankar ◽  
Seethalakshmi Krishnamurthy Diddapur ◽  
Shobha Dhruv Nadagir ◽  
Subramanya Giliyar Kota
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Light Microscope ◽  
Topical Anesthesia ◽  
Foreign Body Sensation ◽  
Oestrus Ovis ◽  
Slit Lamp ◽  
Body Sensation ◽  
Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy

ABSTRACTA 50-year-old male presented with foreign body sensation, pain, and redness in left eye. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy revealed tiny larvae crawling around the conjunctival sac. The larvae, numbering 13, were mechanically removed under topical anesthesia and identified under light microscope as first-stage larvae of Oestrus ovis causing ophthalmomyiasis externa.

scholarly journals External ophthalmomyiasis by sheep botfly – a report from Sirmaur hills

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-66
Author(s):  
Anubhav Chauhan ◽  
◽  
Neha Gautam ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Oestrus Ovis ◽  
Human Tissues ◽  
Slit Lamp ◽  
Slit Lamp Examination ◽  
Topical Antibiotics ◽  
Body Sensation ◽  
History Of ◽  
Conjunctival Inflammation ◽  
The Right

Introduction. Myiasis is caused by larvae of flies infesting animal or human tissues and organs. Aim. In this report we present 2 cases of external ophthalmomyiasis by sheep botfly. Description of the cases. We report a case of two patients who presented with a history of foreign body sensation in the left and the right eye respectively. Slit lamp examination revealed larvae of Oestrus ovis (sheep botfly). In both cases, there was no contact history with sheep or goats. Signs of conjunctival inflammation and corneal involvement were absent in both cases. In most of the previous reports, corneal and conjunctival inflammation was present. Conclusion. Treatment for external ophthalmomyiasis is based on larvae removal and application of topical antibiotics and steroids.

scholarly journals Frequently Experienced Problems in the Early Stages after Prescribing Rigid Gas Permeable Contact Lenses

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 135-139
Author(s):  
Dong Ho Lee
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Foreign Body ◽  
Contact Lenses ◽  
Foreign Body Sensation ◽  
Corneal Curvature ◽  
Slit Lamp ◽  
Body Sensation ◽  
Quality Of Vision ◽  
Slit Lamp Microscopy

Prescribing rigid gas-permeable (RGP) lenses involves a series of processes that determine the most appropriate final lens through the trial use of test lenses based on the results of slit lamp microscopy, measuring refraction and corneal curvature, and corneal topography. The final prescription is reached by judging the dynamic lens movement, adequacy of the tear layer around the lens, corrected vision, and quality of vision. Various problems are encountered soon after prescribing lenses, including foreign body sensation, tear hypersecretion, decreased visual acuity, blurring, visual acuity change, redness, dryness, sudden pain, lens centering, and lens fallout. Here, we examine these problems and how to solve them.

scholarly journals External ophthalmomyiasis by Oestrus ovis: A case report from Davangere

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 116-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sridhar Rao ◽  
Navya Radhakrishnasetty ◽  
Harithaapriyadarshini Chadalavada ◽  
Chandrashekarayya Hiremath
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Foreign Body ◽  
Morphological Features ◽  
Foreign Body Sensation ◽  
Oestrus Ovis ◽  
Oral Antibiotics ◽  
First Instar ◽  
Body Sensation ◽  
Lost To Follow Up

Abstract:External ophthalmomyiasis is an infestation of the eye with larvae of Dermatobia hominis or Oestrus ovis (sheep bot fly). We describe a case of ophthalmomyiasis in a 38-year-old male, who presented with ocular foreign body sensation, redness, pain, and watering of the eye. The causative larvae were removed and sent to the laboratory for identification. By studying morphological features, it was identified as the first instar larvae of O. ovis. The patient was put on topical and oral antibiotics but was lost to follow-up. This is probably the first report from this part of Karnataka.

scholarly journals Recurrent keratoconjunctivitis as the sole manifestation of COVID-19 infection: A case report

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110065
Author(s):  
Satria Audi Hutama ◽  
Firas Farisi Alkaff ◽  
Ryan Enast Intan ◽  
Citra Dewi Maharani ◽  
Luki Indriaswati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Foreign Body ◽  
Foreign Body Sensation ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction Test ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Conjunctival Hyperemia ◽  
Blurred Vision ◽  
Ocular Symptoms ◽  
Body Sensation ◽  
Fluorescence Test

Introduction: Ocular symptoms are uncommon manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Earlier study reported that dry eye, blurred vision, foreign body sensation, tearing, itching, conjunctival secretion, conjunctival congestion, ocular pain, and photophobia are among the ocular symptoms that could be found in COVID-19 patients. However, there are only a few reports available regarding corneal involvement in this disease. Here we report a case of keratoconjunctivitis as the only symptom of COVID-19 infection. Case description: A 27-year-old man who worked as an obstetrics and gynecology resident came to the outpatient clinic with the chief complaints of eye discomfort, foreign body sensation, conjunctival hyperemia, lacrimation, and photophobia in his right eye for the past 3 weeks. Fluorescence test showed a small corneal lesion. The patient was then diagnosed with keratoconjunctivitis. A week after the treatment, all symptoms were resolved. A month later, the patient came to the emergency room with the same eye complaints but with a more severe pain. The fluorescence test showed wider corneal lesion compared to last month. The result from the corneal swab is negative for bacterial or fungal infection, indicating a viral infection. Afterwards, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction test from nasopharyngeal swab was performed and revealed that the patient was positive for COVID-19. Conclusions: This case report showed that keratoconjunctivitis may occur as the only manifestation of COVID-19 infection. Thus, patient presented with unexplainable eye symptoms should be evaluated for COVID-19 infection.

scholarly journals Auscultating a pea: the stethoscope may matter in otorhinolaryngology emergency evaluation

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 530
Author(s):  
Francisco Alves De Sousa ◽  
Ana Costa Silva ◽  
Ana Nóbrega Pinto ◽  
Cecília Almeida E. Sousa
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Lower Lobe ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Foreign Body Sensation ◽  
Careful Examination ◽  
Lower Airway ◽  
Lobe Bronchus ◽  
Body Sensation ◽  
The Right

<p>Foreign body sensation is a common complaint in the otorhinolaryngology emergency. Careful examination of the patient’s pharynx is mandatory, but sometimes the object is not visualized. In such scenario, it may be important to explore signs and symptoms indicating lower aerodigestive impaction. This work describes the case of a 73-year-old woman without relevant comorbidities attending to emergency care. She complained of a foreign body sensation on the right side of the throat after ingesting a meal, which motivated referral to otorhinolaryngology. Flexible transnasal nasopharyngoscopy was unremarkable and no foreign bodies were found. Auscultation was performed revealing low-pitch expiratory wheezing on her right hemithorax. The suspicion of bronchial foreign body was then raised, which was ultimately confirmed by imaging and bronchoscopy, showing an impacted pea on the right lower lobe bronchus. The stethoscope was hence determinant for detecting aspiration, by revealing consistent alterations. Its usage should be encouraged in similar scenarios, highlighting the role of this classic but sometimes forgotten tool. Importantly, higher neck/throat sensations should not exclude the possibility of a lower airway foreign body.</p>

A STUDY OF COMPARISON OF PURE TISSUE REPAIR (DESERDA) AND PROSTHETIC REPAIR (LICHTENSTEIN) METHODS FOR INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR-A COMPARATIVE STUDY

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Harish Chauhan ◽  
Daxesh Patel ◽  
Nishan Gaudani
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Foreign Body ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Late Complication ◽  
Normal Activity ◽  
Foreign Body Sensation ◽  
Prosthetic Repair ◽  
Body Sensation

INTRODUCTION: An ideal hernia repair should be tension free, tissue based, with no potential damage to vital structures, no long term pain or complications and no recurrence. Although Lichtenstein's prosthetic repair is simple and safe, but it is also correlated with risk of infections, recurrence, chronic pain, testicular atrophy and infertility, foreign body sensations and chronic groin sepsis. Desarda hernia repair does not require mesh and provide more physiological support. It is simple, easy to learn. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: a) To compare the operative time, postoperative stay and time required to return normal activity between two groups. b) To compare early complication rate and late complication rate between two groups. MATERIALAND METHODS: This observational study was conducted among patients admitted with the diagnosis of primary inguinal hernia in SMIMER, Surat. The patients were randomly allocated to either Lichtenstein or Desarda method of hernia repair. Operating time, post operative stay and duration of return to normal activity were recorded. Early complications were noted and the patients were followed up to 12 months for late complications (chronic pain, foreign body sensation, and recurrence). RESULTS: The mean operative time and postoperative stay did not show signicant differ for both groups. Patients operated by Desarda technique returned to normal activity signicantly early by 12.2 ± 2.54 days as compared to patients operated by Lichtenstein techniques (14.0 ± 2.76 days, p = 0.01). Most common early complication in both groups was pain (D group; 40.0%, Lgroup: 45.2%) followed by wound infection (D group; 8.0%, Lgroup: 6.5%) and seroma (D group; 0.0%, Lgroup: 3.2%). Occurrence of chronic pain was more in Lgroup (58.1%) as compared to D group (16.0%, p=0.001). None of the patients from D group had foreign body sensation. Foreign body sensation was observed only in ve patients of Lgroup (16.1%). Recurrence rate during one year in Lgroup (6.5%) was higher than D group (4.0%). CONCLUSION: Early return to work was potential benet of Desarda repair. Early complications were similar in both procedures. Desarda repair has lower incidence of chronic pain and foreign body sensation. However, there is no signicant difference for chronic pain in Desarda group when compared in same patients operated bilaterally with different technique. This study was conducted with small sample size with short follow up. Therefore, result of late complication in the present study may insufcient to conclude the probability of occurrence as longer follow up and larger sample size is required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document