scholarly journals Evaluation of dental arch relationship of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
AnjumanPreet Kaur Dua ◽  
AjitKumar Jaiswal ◽  
Kapil Dua
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
Dental Arch Relationship

Evaluation of dental arch relationship of patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate applying bilateral yardstick

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 167 ◽  
Author(s):  
CristianeLucas de Farias Luz ◽  
TerumiOkada Ozawa ◽  
Rafael Arouca ◽  
Amanda Ohashi ◽  
Daiana Broll
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
Dental Arch Relationship

Factors Responsible for Unfavorable Dental Arch Relationship in non Syndromic Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Children

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjida Haque ◽  
Mohammad Khursheed Alam ◽  
Mohd Fadhli Khamis
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Family History ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
History Of ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
Dental Arch Relationship

Objectives: Multiple factors are whispered to be crucial cause of unfavourable dental arch relationship in cleft lip and palate (CLP).This study aims to evaluate the dental arch relationship of Bangladeshi children with non syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) following cheiloplasty and palatoplasty. Also to explore the various congenital (UCLP type, UCLP side, family history of cleft, family history of class III) and environmental (cheiloplasty, palatoplasty) factors that affects dental arch relationship of UCLP patients. Study design: This was a retrospective study where 84 dental models were taken before orthodontic treatment and alveolar bone grafting. The mean age was 7.69± 2.46 (mean± SD). The dental arch relationship was assessed by GOSLON (Great Ormond Street, London and Oslo) Yardstick. According to GOSLON Yardstick, five categories are rated; named- 1: excellent; 2: good; 3: fair; 4: poor; 5: very poor. Also the groups have been dichotomized into favorable (category ratings 1–3) and unfavorable (category ratings 4 and 5) groups. Kappa statistics was used to evaluate the intra- and inter-examiner agreements and logistic regression analysis was used to explore the responsible factors that affect dental arch relationship. Results: Total 37 subjects (44% of all subjects) were categorized into unfavourable group (category rating 4 and 5) using GOSLON yardstick. Intra- and inter-examiner agreements were very good. The mean GOSLON score was 3.238. Using crude and stepwise backward regression analysis, significant association was found between family history of skeletal class III malocclusion (p = 0.015 and p = 0.014 respectively) and unfavourable dental arch relationship. Complete UCLP (p = 0.054) and left sided UCLP (p = 0.053) also seemed to be correlated but not significant with unfavourable dental arch relationship using crude and stepwise backward regression analysis respectively. Conclusion: This analysis suggested that family history of skeletal class III was significantly correlated with unfavourable dental arch relationship of Bangladeshi UCLP children.

Dental arch relationship in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate following Warsaw (one-stage repair) and Oslo protocols

2009 ◽  
pp. 091202121239062
Author(s):  
Piotr Fudalej ◽  
Maria Hortis-Dzierzbicka ◽  
Zofia Dudkiewicz ◽  
Gunvor Semb
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Dental Arch Relationship

A Longitudinal Three-Center Study of Dental Arch Relationship in Patients With Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodosia Bartzela ◽  
Christos Katsaros ◽  
William C. Shaw ◽  
Elisabeth Rønning ◽  
Sara Rizell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Dental Arch Relationship ◽  
Center Study

Dental Arch Relationship in Children with Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate following Warsaw (One-Stage Repair) and Oslo Protocols

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 648-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Fudalej ◽  
Maria Hortis-Dzierzbicka ◽  
Zofia Dudkiewicz ◽  
Gunvor Semb
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Weighted Kappa ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Kappa Statistics ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Mother And Child ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Dental Arch Relationship

Objective: To compare the dental arch relationship following one-stage repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) in Warsaw with a matched sample of patients treated by the Oslo Cleft Team. Material: Study models of 61 children (mean age, 11.2; SD, 1.7) with a nonsyndromic complete UCLP consecutively treated with one-stage closure of the cleft at 9.2 months (range, 6.0 to 15.8 months; SD, 2.0) by the Warsaw Cleft Team at the Institute of Mother and Child, Poland, were compared with a sample drawn from a consecutive series of patients with UCLP treated by the Oslo Cleft Team and matched for age, gender, and soft tissue band. Methods: The study models were given random numbers to blind their origin. Four examiners rated the dental arch relationship using the GOSLON Yardstick. The strength of agreement of rating was assessed with weighted Kappa statistics. An independent t-test was carried out to compare the GOSLON scores between Warsaw and Oslo samples, and Fisher's exact tests were performed to evaluate the difference of distribution of the GOSLON scores. Results: The intrarater and interrater agreements were high (K ≥ .800). No difference in dental arch relationship between Warsaw and Oslo groups was found (mean GOSLON score  =  2.68 and 2.65 for Warsaw and Oslo samples, respectively). The distribution of the GOSLON grades was similar in both groups. Conclusions: The dental arch relationship following one-stage repair (Warsaw protocol) was comparable with the outcome of the Oslo Cleft Team's protocol.

Use of Bauru Yardstick in Patients With Complete Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate at an Indian Center

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 602-606
Author(s):  
Puneet Batra ◽  
Gopala Krishna Annavarapv ◽  
Ashish Chopra ◽  
Amit Srivastava ◽  
Partha Sadhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Weighted Kappa ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Examiner Agreement ◽  
Dental Cast ◽  
Dental Arch Relationship ◽  
Very High

Objective: To evaluate dental arch relationship in treated bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) cases at an Indian cleft center using the Bauru yardstick. Patients and methods: Digital photographs of the dental cast of 50 consecutively treated patients (28 males and 22 females) with nonsyndromic BCLP at an Indian cleft center were rated by 2 examiners as per the Bauru yardstick for the 12-year-old age group. The average age group was 12 ± 0.62 years. All cases were treated with same surgical protocol. Results: The inter-examiner agreement between the 3 examiners was found to be very high, with weighted kappa values ranging from 0.894 to 0.951. The intraexaminer agreement between the 2 examinations for all the examiners was also found to be very high, with weighted kappa values ranging from 0.894 to 0.931. Seventy-eight percent of patients were rated with a Bauru yardstick score of 1+2. In addition, 10% of patients were rated with a score of 3, 8% as 4, and 4% as 5. The overall Bauru yardstick score for the center was 2.36. Conclusion: The protocol followed for the repair of BCLP cases by the center was found to be a good regimen in regard to the Bauru yardstick score.

Scandcleft randomized trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: impact of maxillary dental agenesis on craniofacial growth and dental arch relationship in 8 year olds

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Rizell ◽  
Annelise Küseler ◽  
Arja Heliövaara ◽  
Pål Skaare ◽  
Eli Brinck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Craniofacial Growth ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Maxillary Tooth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Dental Arch Relationship

Summary Background It is suggested that dental agenesis affects maxillary protrusion and dental arch relationship in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). In addition, an association between the need for orthognathic surgery and dental agenesis is reported. Aim The aim was to study the impact of maxillary dental agenesis on craniofacial growth and dental arch relationship in 8-year-old children with UCLP. Subjects and methods The sample consisted of individuals with UCLP from Scandcleft randomized trials. The participants had available data from diagnosis of maxillary dental agenesis as well as cephalometric measurements (n = 399) and GOSLON assessment (n = 408) at 8 years of age. Results A statistically significant difference was found for ANB between individuals with agenesis of two or more maxillary teeth (mean 1.52°) in comparison with those with no or only one missing maxillary tooth (mean 3.30° and 2.70°, respectively). Mean NSL/NL was lower among individuals with agenesis of two or more maxillary teeth (mean 9.90°), in comparison with individuals with no or one missing maxillary tooth (mean 11.46° and 11.45°, respectively). The number of individuals with GOSLON score 4–5 was 47.2% in the group with two or more missing maxillary teeth and 26.1% respectively 26.3% in the groups with no or one missing maxillary tooth. No statistically significant difference was found in the comparison between individuals with no agenesis or with agenesis solely of the cleft-side lateral. Conclusion Maxillary dental agenesis impacts on craniofacial growth as well as dental arch relationship and should be considered in orthodontic treatment planning.

A New Yardstick for Rating Dental Arch Relationship in Patients with Complete Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terumi Okada Ozawa ◽  
William C. Shaw ◽  
Christos Katsaros ◽  
Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman ◽  
Catharina Hagberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Dental Arch Relationship

The Eurocleft Study: Intercenter Study of Treatment Outcome in Patients with Complete Cleft Lip and Palate. Part 3: Dental Arch Relationships

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Mølsted ◽  
Viveca Brattström ◽  
Birte Prahl-Andersen ◽  
William C. Shaw ◽  
Gunvor Semb
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Northern Europe ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Causal Factors ◽  
Main Outcome Measure ◽  
Panel Rating ◽  
Dental Arch Relationship

Objective To compare dental arch relationships up to age 17 in individuals with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) treated at five European centers. Design Longitudinal cohort study, where results were previously reported at 9 years and follow-up measurements were obtained for 12 and 17 years. Setting Multidisciplinary cleft services in Northern Europe. Subjects 127 consecutively treated individuals with repaired UCLP. Main outcome measure Panel rating of dental arch relationship. Results The results revealed that at 17 years of age three of the centers had better ratings in dental arch relationship (means scores: 1.7, 1.9, and 2.2, respectively) than the other two centers (3.3, 3.4) at statistically significant levels (p < .01 to p < .001). Conclusion The results confirm that systematic differences in dental arch relationships may occur between different cleft centers, but do not allow specific causal factors to be identified.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document