The Eurocleft Study: Intercenter Study of Treatment Outcome in Patients with Complete Cleft Lip and Palate. Part 3: Dental Arch Relationships

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Mølsted ◽  
Viveca Brattström ◽  
Birte Prahl-Andersen ◽  
William C. Shaw ◽  
Gunvor Semb
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Northern Europe ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Causal Factors ◽  
Main Outcome Measure ◽  
Panel Rating ◽  
Dental Arch Relationship

Objective To compare dental arch relationships up to age 17 in individuals with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) treated at five European centers. Design Longitudinal cohort study, where results were previously reported at 9 years and follow-up measurements were obtained for 12 and 17 years. Setting Multidisciplinary cleft services in Northern Europe. Subjects 127 consecutively treated individuals with repaired UCLP. Main outcome measure Panel rating of dental arch relationship. Results The results revealed that at 17 years of age three of the centers had better ratings in dental arch relationship (means scores: 1.7, 1.9, and 2.2, respectively) than the other two centers (3.3, 3.4) at statistically significant levels (p < .01 to p < .001). Conclusion The results confirm that systematic differences in dental arch relationships may occur between different cleft centers, but do not allow specific causal factors to be identified.

Skeletal and Dental Correction and Stability Following LeFort I Advancement in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Maxillary Hypoplasia

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562199610
Author(s):  
Buddhathida Wangsrimongkol ◽  
Roberto L. Flores ◽  
David A. Staffenberg ◽  
Eduardo D. Rodriguez ◽  
Pradip. R. Shetye
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Maxillary Hypoplasia ◽  
Main Outcome Measure ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms

Objective: This study evaluates skeletal and dental outcomes of LeFort I advancement surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) with varying degrees of maxillary skeletal hypoplasia. Design: Retrospective study. Method: Lateral cephalograms were digitized at preoperative (T1), immediately postoperative (T2), and 1-year follow-up (T3) and compared to untreated unaffected controls. Based on the severity of cleft maxillary hypoplasia, the sample was divided into 3 groups using Wits analysis: mild: ≤0 to ≥−5 mm; moderate: <−5 to >−10 mm; and severe: ≤−10 mm. Participants: Fifty-one patients with nonsyndromic CLP with hypoplastic maxilla who met inclusion criteria. Intervention: LeFort I advancement. Main Outcome Measure: Skeletal and dental stability post-LeFort I surgery at a 1-year follow-up. Results: At T2, LeFort I surgery produced an average correction of maxillary hypoplasia by 6.4 ± 0.6, 8.1 ± 0.4, and 10.7 ± 0.8 mm in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. There was a mean relapse of 1 to 1.5 mm observed in all groups. At T3, no statistically significant differences were observed between the surgical groups and controls at angle Sella, Nasion, A point (SNA), A point, Nasion, B point (ANB), and overjet outcome measures. Conclusions: LeFort I advancement produces a stable correction in mild, moderate, and severe skeletal maxillary hypoplasia. Overcorrection is recommended in all patients with CLP to compensate for the expected postsurgical skeletal relapse.

Dental arch relationship in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate following Warsaw (one-stage repair) and Oslo protocols

2009 ◽  
pp. 091202121239062
Author(s):  
Piotr Fudalej ◽  
Maria Hortis-Dzierzbicka ◽  
Zofia Dudkiewicz ◽  
Gunvor Semb
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Dental Arch Relationship

A Longitudinal Three-Center Study of Dental Arch Relationship in Patients With Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodosia Bartzela ◽  
Christos Katsaros ◽  
William C. Shaw ◽  
Elisabeth Rønning ◽  
Sara Rizell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Dental Arch Relationship ◽  
Center Study

Oronasal Transfixion Suture to Prevent Uplifted Nasal Floor Deformity in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A 5-Year Follow-Up

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 390-394
Author(s):  
Yuta Nakajima ◽  
Shunsuke Yuzuriha ◽  
Fumio Nagai ◽  
Kenya Fujita ◽  
Masahiko Noguchi
Keyword(s):  
Private Practice ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Nasal Floor ◽  
Orbicularis Oris Muscle

Objective: In unilateral cleft lip and palate, the reconstructed nasal floor is sometimes uplifted regardless of the reconstructive method used. We used a 5-0 absorbable anchoring suture, the oronasal transfixion suture (ONT suture), to fasten the reconstructed nasal floor to the orbicularis oris muscle to prevent this deformity. This study was performed to evaluate the effects of the ONT suture. Design: Blind retrospective study of photography and chart review. Setting: Shinshu University Hospital, tertiary care, Nagano, Japan. Private practice. Patients: Ninety-three consecutive patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate who had undergone primary nasolabial repair in our department and affiliated hospitals between 1999 and 2011 participated in this study. Finally, 45 patients were included. Interventions: The ONT suture was put in place at the time of primary nasolabial repair. Main Outcome Measure: The height of the nasal floor was evaluated on submental view photographs at 5 years old. Results: The ONT suture was applied in 21 patients. The height of the nasal floor on the cleft side was significantly closer to that on the noncleft side with the ONT suture than without the ONT suture ( P = .008). Conclusions: The ONT suture is effective to prevent uplifted nasal floor deformity on the cleft side// in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate at the time of primary nasolabial repair.

Evaluation of dental arch relationship of patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate applying bilateral yardstick

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 167 ◽  
Author(s):  
CristianeLucas de Farias Luz ◽  
TerumiOkada Ozawa ◽  
Rafael Arouca ◽  
Amanda Ohashi ◽  
Daiana Broll
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
Dental Arch Relationship

Should Cleft Surgery Always be Performed During the Matutine Time? Analysis of Early and Late Postoperative Complications in a Cleft Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 1332-1335
Author(s):  
Daniel Velez Restrepo ◽  
Marilson Hideki Sato ◽  
Fernanda Saturnino Cardoso ◽  
Renato da Silva Freitas
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Discrete Variables ◽  
Time Analysis ◽  
Main Outcome Measure ◽  
Operating Surgeon ◽  
Type Of Surgery ◽  
Cleft Surgery

Objective: Surgeries performed in the afternoon schedule were discouraged by Smile Train Foundation for patients younger than 2 years. The aim of this study is to present the incidence of complications discriminating time of surgery (morning/afternoon) in a reference center in Curitiba (Brazil) during 2017. Design: Retrospective study that evaluated all cleft surgeries that were performed at Assistance Center for Cleft Lip and Palate during 2017. Complications correlated with surgery period (morning/afternoon), type of surgery, and operating surgeon were studied. Statistical analysis was performed to find any association between discrete variables. Setting: Tertiary, institutional Participants: One hundred eighty-seven patients with cleft lip and/or cleft palate/cleft lip and palate, who were evaluated and submitted to surgery in the center and had less than 24 months of age, were included in the study. Interventions: One hundred twenty-four cheiloplasties and 63 palatoplasties were performed. Main Outcome Measure: Incidence of complications. Results: From the total of cheiloplasties, the number of complications was 2 (1.6%) and from the total of palatoplasties the number of complications was 11 (17%); 8.1% of surgeries that were performed in the morning had any complication compared to 5.1% of surgeries performed in the afternoon. Statistical analysis of discrete variables with χ2 test showed no correlation between surgery schedule and complications (χ2 = 0.62). Conclusion: The number of complications was not higher in the afternoon scheduled surgeries. Surgeon expertise had a statistically significant correlation with the absence of complications (χ2 = 20.57).

The Eurocleft Study: Intercenter Study of Treatment Outcome in Patients with Complete Cleft Lip and Palate. Part 4: Relationship among Treatment Outcome, Patient/Parent Satisfaction, and the Burden of Care

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunvor Semb ◽  
Viveca Brattström ◽  
Kirsten Mølsted ◽  
Birte Prahl-Andersen ◽  
Petra Zuurbier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Parent Satisfaction ◽  
Northern Europe ◽  
Burden Of Care ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Questionnaire Surveys ◽  
High Level

Objective To assess patient/parent satisfaction with the treatment they had received from their respective teams, and to explore interrelationships between satisfaction, objectively rated outcome, and the burden of care. Design This study reports cross-sectional data as part of the overall longitudinal cohort study reported in the other four papers of this series. Setting Multidisciplinary cleft services in Northern Europe. Subjects 127 consecutively treated 17-year-olds with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate and their parents. Main Outcome Measure Patient/parent satisfaction. Results Generally, there was a high level of patient/parent satisfaction. There were no relationships among satisfaction, objectively rated outcomes, and the amount of care. Conclusions This study highlights various challenges involved in questionnaire surveys into patient/parent satisfaction, and underlines the need for collective efforts to improve our understanding of this issue.

Dental Arch Relationship in Children with Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate following Warsaw (One-Stage Repair) and Oslo Protocols

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 648-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Fudalej ◽  
Maria Hortis-Dzierzbicka ◽  
Zofia Dudkiewicz ◽  
Gunvor Semb
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Weighted Kappa ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Kappa Statistics ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Mother And Child ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Dental Arch Relationship

Objective: To compare the dental arch relationship following one-stage repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) in Warsaw with a matched sample of patients treated by the Oslo Cleft Team. Material: Study models of 61 children (mean age, 11.2; SD, 1.7) with a nonsyndromic complete UCLP consecutively treated with one-stage closure of the cleft at 9.2 months (range, 6.0 to 15.8 months; SD, 2.0) by the Warsaw Cleft Team at the Institute of Mother and Child, Poland, were compared with a sample drawn from a consecutive series of patients with UCLP treated by the Oslo Cleft Team and matched for age, gender, and soft tissue band. Methods: The study models were given random numbers to blind their origin. Four examiners rated the dental arch relationship using the GOSLON Yardstick. The strength of agreement of rating was assessed with weighted Kappa statistics. An independent t-test was carried out to compare the GOSLON scores between Warsaw and Oslo samples, and Fisher's exact tests were performed to evaluate the difference of distribution of the GOSLON scores. Results: The intrarater and interrater agreements were high (K ≥ .800). No difference in dental arch relationship between Warsaw and Oslo groups was found (mean GOSLON score  =  2.68 and 2.65 for Warsaw and Oslo samples, respectively). The distribution of the GOSLON grades was similar in both groups. Conclusions: The dental arch relationship following one-stage repair (Warsaw protocol) was comparable with the outcome of the Oslo Cleft Team's protocol.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document