scholarly journals Non-cell autonomous role of astrocytes in axonal degeneration of cortical projection neurons in hereditary spastic paraplegias

2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1265
Author(s):  
Xue-Jun Li
Keyword(s):  
Axonal Degeneration ◽  
Projection Neurons ◽  
Cortical Projection ◽  
Hereditary Spastic Paraplegias

scholarly journals Impaired lipid metabolism in astrocytes underlies degeneration of cortical projection neurons in hereditary spastic paraplegia

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongchao Mou ◽  
Yi Dong ◽  
Zhenyu Chen ◽  
Kyle R. Denton ◽  
Michael O. Duff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Axonal Transport ◽  
Lipid Droplet ◽  
Axonal Degeneration ◽  
Cholesterol Homeostasis ◽  
Projection Neurons ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Cortical Projection ◽  
Hereditary Spastic Paraplegias ◽  
Cholesterol Levels ◽  
Lipid Droplet Size

AbstractHereditary spastic paraplegias (HSPs) are caused by a length-dependent axonopathy of long corticospinal neurons, but how axons of these cortical projection neurons (PNs) degenerate remains elusive. We generated isogenic human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) lines for two ATL1 missense mutations associated with SPG3A, the most common early-onset autosomal dominant HSP. In hPSC-derived cortical PNs, ATL1 mutations resulted in reduced axonal outgrowth, impaired axonal transport, and accumulated axonal swellings, recapitulating disease-specific phenotypes. Importantly, ATL1 mutations dysregulated proteolipid gene expression, reduced lipid droplet size in astrocytes, and unexpectedly disrupted cholesterol transfer from glia to neurons, leading to cholesterol deficiency in SPG3A cortical PNs. Applying cholesterol or conditioned medium from control astrocytes, a major source of cholesterol in the brain, rescued aberrant axonal transport and swellings in SPG3A cortical PNs. Furthermore, treatment with the NR1H2 agonist GW3965 corrected lipid droplet defects in SPG3A astrocytes and promoted cholesterol efflux from astrocytes, leading to restoration of cholesterol levels and rescue of axonal degeneration in SPG3A cortical PNs. These results reveal a non-cell autonomous mechanism underlying axonal degeneration of cortical PNs mediated by impaired cholesterol homeostasis in glia.

Author response for "Laminar distribution of cortical projection neurons to the pulvinar: A comparative study in cats and mice"

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Oliveira Ferreira de Souza ◽  
Éve‐Marie Frigon ◽  
Robert Tremblay‐Laliberté ◽  
Christian Casanova ◽  
Denis Boire
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Author Response ◽  
Projection Neurons ◽  
Cortical Projection ◽  
Laminar Distribution

Differences in synaptic integration between direct and indirect striatal projection neurons: Role of CaV 3 channels

Synapse ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. e22079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brisa García-Vilchis ◽  
Paola Suárez ◽  
Miguel Serrano-Reyes ◽  
Mario Arias-García ◽  
Dagoberto Tapia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Synaptic Integration ◽  
Projection Neurons ◽  
Striatal Projection Neurons

Muscarinic presynaptic modulation in GABAergic pallidal synapses of the rat

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (3) ◽  
pp. 796-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Hernández-Martínez ◽  
José J. Aceves ◽  
Pavel E. Rueda-Orozco ◽  
Teresa Hernández-Flores ◽  
Omar Hernández-González ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Receptor Agonist ◽  
Projection Neurons ◽  
Quantal Content ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Paired Pulse ◽  
Short Term Plasticity ◽  
Striatal Projection Neurons ◽  
Muscarinic Cholinergic ◽  
Muscarinic Modulation

The external globus pallidus (GPe) is central for basal ganglia processing. It expresses muscarinic cholinergic receptors and receives cholinergic afferents from the pedunculopontine nuclei (PPN) and other regions. The role of these receptors and afferents is unknown. Muscarinic M1-type receptors are expressed by synapses from striatal projection neurons (SPNs). Because axons from SPNs project to the GPe, one hypothesis is that striatopallidal GABAergic terminals may be modulated by M1 receptors. Alternatively, some M1 receptors may be postsynaptic in some pallidal neurons. Evidence of muscarinic modulation in any of these elements would suggest that cholinergic afferents from the PPN, or other sources, could modulate the function of the GPe. In this study, we show this evidence using striatopallidal slice preparations: after field stimulation in the striatum, the cholinergic muscarinic receptor agonist muscarine significantly reduced the amplitude of inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) from synapses that exhibited short-term synaptic facilitation. This inhibition was associated with significant increases in paired-pulse facilitation, and quantal content was proportional to IPSC amplitude. These actions were blocked by atropine, pirenzepine, and mamba toxin-7, suggesting that receptors involved were M1. In addition, we found that some pallidal neurons have functional postsynaptic M1 receptors. Moreover, some evoked IPSCs exhibited short-term depression and a different kind of modulation: they were indirectly modulated by muscarine via the activation of presynaptic cannabinoid CB1 receptors. Thus pallidal synapses presenting distinct forms of short-term plasticity were modulated differently.

scholarly journals Target-specific M1 inputs to infragranular S1 pyramidal neurons

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 1261-1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda K. Kinnischtzke ◽  
Erika E. Fanselow ◽  
Daniel J. Simons
Keyword(s):  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Pyramidal Neurons ◽  
Projection Neurons ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Intrinsic Properties ◽  
Subcortical Structures ◽  
Medial Nucleus ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Posterior Medial Nucleus

The functional role of input from the primary motor cortex (M1) to primary somatosensory cortex (S1) is unclear; one key to understanding this pathway may lie in elucidating the cell-type specific microcircuits that connect S1 and M1. Recently, we discovered that a subset of pyramidal neurons in the infragranular layers of S1 receive especially strong input from M1 (Kinnischtzke AK, Simons DJ, Fanselow EE. Cereb Cortex 24: 2237–2248, 2014), suggesting that M1 may affect specific classes of pyramidal neurons differently. Here, using combined optogenetic and retrograde labeling approaches in the mouse, we examined the strengths of M1 inputs to five classes of infragranular S1 neurons categorized by their projections to particular cortical and subcortical targets. We found that the magnitude of M1 synaptic input to S1 pyramidal neurons varies greatly depending on the projection target of the postsynaptic neuron. Of the populations examined, M1-projecting corticocortical neurons in L6 received the strongest M1 inputs, whereas ventral posterior medial nucleus-projecting corticothalamic neurons, also located in L6, received the weakest. Each population also possessed distinct intrinsic properties. The results suggest that M1 differentially engages specific classes of S1 projection neurons, thereby regulating the motor-related influence S1 exerts over subcortical structures.

scholarly journals Directional Asymmetry of Neurons in Cortical Areas MT and MST Projecting to the NOT-DTN in Macaques

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 2113-2123 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.-P. Hoffmann ◽  
F. Bremmer ◽  
A. Thiele ◽  
C. Distler
Keyword(s):  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Optic Tract ◽  
Directional Asymmetry ◽  
Projection Neurons ◽  
Cortical Projection ◽  
Directional Bias ◽  
Stimulus Movement ◽  
Equal Distribution ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Optokinetic Reflex

The cortical projection to the subcortical pathway underlying the optokinetic reflex was studied using antidromic electrical stimulation in the midbrain structures nucleus of the optic tract and dorsal terminal nucleus of the accessory optic system (NOT-DTN) while simultaneously recording from cortical neurons in the superior temporal sulcus (STS) of macaque monkeys. Projection neurons were found in all subregions of the middle temporal area (MT) as well as in the medial superior temporal area (MST). Antidromic latencies ranged from 0.9 to 6 ms with a median of 1.8 ms. There was a strong bias in the population of cortical neurons projecting to the NOT-DTN for ipsiversive stimulus movement (towards the recording side), whereas in the population of cortical neurons not projecting to the NOT-DTN a more or less equal distribution of stimulus directions was evident. Our data indicate that there is no special area in the posterior STS coding for ipsiversive horizontal stimulus movement. Instead, a specific selection of cortical neurons from areas MT and MST forms the projection to the NOT-DTN and as a subpopulation has the same directional bias as their subcortical target neurons. These findings are discussed in relation to the functional grouping of cortical output as an organizational principle for specific motor responses.

scholarly journals Nav1.6 promotes inflammation and neuronal degeneration in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barakat Alrashdi ◽  
Bassel Dawod ◽  
Andrea Schampel ◽  
Sabine Tacke ◽  
Stefanie Kuerten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Axonal Degeneration ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Neuronal Degeneration ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis ◽  
Aav Vector ◽  
Α Subunit

Abstract Background In multiple sclerosis (MS) and in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of MS, the Nav1.6 voltage-gated sodium (Nav) channel isoform has been implicated as a primary contributor to axonal degeneration. Following demyelination Nav1.6, which is normally co-localized with the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) at the nodes of Ranvier, associates with β-APP, a marker of neural injury. The persistent influx of sodium through Nav1.6 is believed to reverse the function of NCX, resulting in an increased influx of damaging Ca2+ ions. However, direct evidence for the role of Nav1.6 in axonal degeneration is lacking. Methods In mice floxed for Scn8a, the gene that encodes the α subunit of Nav1.6, subjected to EAE we examined the effect of eliminating Nav1.6 from retinal ganglion cells (RGC) in one eye using an AAV vector harboring Cre and GFP, while using the contralateral either injected with AAV vector harboring GFP alone or non-targeted eye as control. Results In retinas, the expression of Rbpms, a marker for retinal ganglion cells, was found to be inversely correlated to the expression of Scn8a. Furthermore, the gene expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines Il6 (IL-6) and Ifng (IFN-γ), and of the reactive gliosis marker Gfap (GFAP) were found to be reduced in targeted retinas. Optic nerves from targeted eyes were shown to have reduced macrophage infiltration and improved axonal health. Conclusion Taken together, our results are consistent with Nav1.6 promoting inflammation and contributing to axonal degeneration following demyelination.

scholarly journals Single-cell genomics identifies cell type–specific molecular changes in autism

Science ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 364 (6441) ◽  
pp. 685-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry Velmeshev ◽  
Lucas Schirmer ◽  
Diane Jung ◽  
Maximilian Haeussler ◽  
Yonatan Perez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Types ◽  
Molecular State ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Projection Neurons ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Cortical Projection ◽  
Molecular Changes ◽  
Single Nucleus ◽  
Gene Expression Studies ◽  
Transcriptomic Changes

Despite the clinical and genetic heterogeneity of autism, bulk gene expression studies show that changes in the neocortex of autism patients converge on common genes and pathways. However, direct assessment of specific cell types in the brain affected by autism has not been feasible until recently. We used single-nucleus RNA sequencing of cortical tissue from patients with autism to identify autism-associated transcriptomic changes in specific cell types. We found that synaptic signaling of upper-layer excitatory neurons and the molecular state of microglia are preferentially affected in autism. Moreover, our results show that dysregulation of specific groups of genes in cortico-cortical projection neurons correlates with clinical severity of autism. These findings suggest that molecular changes in upper-layer cortical circuits are linked to behavioral manifestations of autism.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document