scholarly journals A randomized comparative trial of two low-dose oral isotretinoin regimens in moderate to severe acne vulgaris

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 378 ◽  
Author(s):  
DaulatRam Dhaked ◽  
RamSingh Meena ◽  
Anshul Maheshwari ◽  
UmaShankar Agarwal ◽  
Saroj Purohit
Author(s):  
Rashmi Jindal ◽  
Samarjit Roy ◽  
Akanksha Jain

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Oral isotretinoin and azithromycin are two important drugs used in management of acne. Their mode of action is different and thus theoretically the combination of these two should have a synergistic effect.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> In this randomized comparative trial 100 patients were randomized into two groups. One received oral isotretinoin (0.3 mg/kg/day) alone and the other group received pulsed azithromycin (500 mg/day for three days in a week for 8 weeks) in addition to oral isotretinoin. Improvement in acne was noted as percentage improvement in mean acne score.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> No statistically significant difference was noted in the improvement in mean acne score of both the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Addition of pulsed azithromycin to low dose oral isotretinoin does not offer a better treatment outcome in patients of moderate to severe acne. </p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. e12715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdy Abd El Aziz Ragab ◽  
Salma Samir Omar ◽  
Andrew Collier ◽  
Reham Abdel Haleem Abo El-Wafa ◽  
Neveen Gomaa

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-22
Author(s):  
Maria Syed ◽  
Syed Afaq Ahmed

Background: Oral isotretinoin is the recommended treatment for acne vulgaris, a skin disease especially common in teenagers and adolescents. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of low dose with high dose isotretinoin in severe acne vulgaris patients.Material and Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 110 patients with a clinical diagnosis of acne vulgaris. They were divided into two groups. Both groups were matched for age (mean 18.2±3.7 vs 17.6±3.2 years), weight (mean 58±10.2 vs 60.7±9.3 Kg), gender and disease duration (3±1.1 vs 3±1.0 years). Group A received low dose oral isotretinoin (20 mg/day) while group B received standard high dose regimen (1mg/kg/day). All patients were followed up for 16 weeks to assess efficacy (assessment of complete remission) and safety (mucocutaneous side effects). All calculations were performed using SPSS v. 16 with p value <0.05 considered as statistically significant.Results: There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy. However, significantly fewer mucocutaneous side effects were reported in group A (80%) as compared to group B (100%). This safety profile spectrum was observed across all pre-defined subsets i.e chielitis (78.1% vs 98.2%), dry skin (69.1% vs 92.7%), dry mouth (47.2% vs 72.7%) and facial rash (12.7% vs 30.9%).Conclusion: In patients with severe acne vulgaris, efficacy (complete remission) of low dose oral isotretinoin is almost equal to conventional high dose regimen but it is statistically superior in terms of safety (mucocutaneous side effects).


2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristhine de Souza Leão Kamamoto ◽  
Adriana Sanudo ◽  
Karime M. Hassun ◽  
Ediléia Bagatin

Author(s):  
Santhosh A. Shetti ◽  
Nagesh H. N. ◽  
Nagabushan Hanumanthaiah

Background: Acne Vulgaris is chronic inflammatory disease of pilosebaceous units. Oral isotretinoin is recommended for moderate to severe acne vulgaris who are not responding satisfactorily to conventional therapies. Recent reports indicate that acne patients have been benefiting from the low dose treatment protocols. However, long term daily use of this drug results in frequent side effects such mucocutaneous and systemic side effects. Our aim was to assess and compare the various side effects and patient satisfaction of oral isotretinoin in low dose continuous and intermittent treatment of moderate to severe acne vulgaris.Methods: This was a prospective randomized open labeled comparative study carried out at outpatient department in the Department of Dermatology in Mandya Institute of Medical sciences, Mandya. Patients with moderate to severe acne were assigned equally (50 subjects each) to one of the two treatment regimens by using block randomization technique, Group A was given low dose continuous regimen-20 mg oral isotretinoin once daily for 4 months and Group B was given low dose intermittent regimen-20 mg oral isotretinoin once daily for 1 week out of every 4 weeks. The patients were followed up every 4th week during the treatment period. The patients were examined and side effects were noted in each visit. A six month follow-up evaluation was done to analyze patient satisfaction.Results: Muco-cutaneous dryness was most common adverse effect noted in both the groups A and B. Itching (42%), Alopecia (44%), Myalgia (36%) were seen most commonly in group A and Acne flaring (47%) was most common with group B. With regard to patient satisfaction, in group A 42% were satisfied and 20% were very satisfied, in group B 36% were satisfied and 14% were very satisfied.Conclusions: Study suggests that, Muco-cutaneous dryness was most common side effect in both treatment regimens. Side effects were more frequent with low dose continuous than low dose intermittent isotretinoin regimen. Patient satisfaction was better in continuous regimen.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 233 ◽  
Author(s):  
NasrinMotamedi Fard ◽  
Gita Faghihi ◽  
Fatemeh Mokhtari ◽  
Narges Motamedi ◽  
SayedMohsen Hosseini

2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 123-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Michael Maloney ◽  
Deborah I. Arbit ◽  
Mary Flack ◽  
Constance McLaughlin-Miley ◽  
Cynthia Sevilla ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document