scholarly journals Differences in traditional and non-traditional risk factors with special reference to nutritional factors in patients with coronary artery disease with or without diabetes mellitus

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 844 ◽  
Author(s):  
NamitaP Mahalle ◽  
SadanandS Naik ◽  
MK Garg ◽  
MohanV Kulkarni
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (19) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia Manfrini ◽  
Jinsung Yoon ◽  
Mihaela van der Schaar ◽  
Sasko Kedev ◽  
Marija Vavlukis ◽  
...  

Background It is still unknown whether traditional risk factors may have a sex‐specific impact on coronary artery disease (CAD) burden. Methods and Results We identified 14 793 patients who underwent coronary angiography for acute coronary syndromes in the ISACS‐TC (International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Transitional Countries; Clini​calTr​ials.gov , NCT01218776) registry from 2010 to 2019. The main outcome measure was the association between traditional risk factors and severity of CAD and its relationship with 30‐day mortality. Relative risk (RR) ratios and 95% CIs were calculated from the ratio of the absolute risks of women versus men using inverse probability of weighting. Estimates were compared by test of interaction on the log scale. Severity of CAD was categorized as obstructive (≥50% stenosis) versus nonobstructive CAD. The RR ratio for obstructive CAD in women versus men among people without diabetes mellitus was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.41–0.60) and among those with diabetes mellitus was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.62–1.29), with an interaction by diabetes mellitus status of P =0.002. Exposure to smoking shifted the RR ratios from 0.50 (95% CI, 0.41–0.61) in nonsmokers to 0.75 (95% CI, 0.54–1.03) in current smokers, with an interaction by smoking status of P =0.018. There were no significant sex‐related interactions with hypercholesterolemia and hypertension. Women with obstructive CAD had higher 30‐day mortality rates than men (RR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.48–2.07). No sex differences in mortality were observed in patients with nonobstructive CAD. Conclusions Obstructive CAD in women signifies a higher risk for mortality compared with men. Current smoking and diabetes mellitus disproportionally increase the risk of obstructive CAD in women. Achieving the goal of improving cardiovascular health in women still requires intensive efforts toward further implementation of lifestyle and treatment interventions. Registration URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01218776.


Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 442-P
Author(s):  
KAZUYA FUJIHARA ◽  
YASUHIRO MATSUBAYASHI ◽  
MASARU KITAZAWA ◽  
MASAHIKO YAMAMOTO ◽  
TAEKO OSAWA ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuyoshi Takahara ◽  
◽  
Osamu Iida ◽  
Shun Kohsaka ◽  
Yoshimitsu Soga ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (LE-PAD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are both pathologically rooted in atherosclerosis, and their shared clinical features regarding the exposure to cardiovascular risk factors have been emphasized. However, comparative data of the two cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) were so far lacking. The purpose of this study was to directly compare the clinical profile between cases undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) for LE-PAD and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods Data were extracted from the nationwide procedural databases of EVT and PCI in Japan (J-EVT and J-PCI) between 2012 and 2017. A total of 1,121,359 cases (103,887 EVT cases for critical limb ischemia [CLI] or intermittent claudication and 1,017,472 PCI cases for acute coronary syndrome [ACS] or stable angina) were analyzed. Heterogeneity in clinical profile between CVDs was evaluated using the C statistic of the logistic regression model for which dependent variable was one CVD versus another, and explanatory variables were clinical profile. When two CVDs were completely discriminated from each other by the developed model, the C statistic (discrimination ability) of the model would be equal to 1, indicating that the two CVDs were completely different in clinical profile. On the other hand, when two CVDs were identical in clinical profile, the developed model would not discriminate them at all, with the C statistic equal to 0.5. Results Mean age was 73.5 ± 9.3 years in LE-PAD patients versus 70.0 ± 11.2 years in CAD patients (P < 0.001). The prevalence of diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal disease was 1.96- and 6.39-times higher in LE-PAD patients than in CAD patients (both P < 0.001). The higher prevalence was observed irrespective of age group. The exposure to other cardiovascular risk factors and the likelihood of cardiovascular risk clustering also varied between the diseases. The between-disease heterogeneity in patient profile was particularly evident between CLI and ACS, with the C statistic equal to 0.833 (95% CI 0.831–0.836). Conclusions The current study, an analysis based on nationwide procedural databases, confirmed that patient profiles were not identical but rather considerably different between clinically significant LE-PAD and CAD warranting revascularization.


2010 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 278-284
Author(s):  
Vadim A. Kuznetsov ◽  
Elena I. Yaroslavskaya ◽  
Marina I. Bessonova ◽  
Ivan S. Bessonov ◽  
Igor P. Zyrianov ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 102 (11) ◽  
pp. 1227-1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey L. Anderson ◽  
Joseph B. Muhlestein ◽  
Benjamin D. Horne ◽  
John F. Carlquist ◽  
Tami L. Bair ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document