Erratum: shivering prevention during cesarean section by intrathecal injection of magnesium sulfate: randomized double-blind controlled study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 260
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heba Omar ◽  
Mona Hossam Eldin ◽  
Wessam Adel Aboella ◽  
Bassant Mohamed Abdelhamid ◽  
Passaint Hassan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Hypothermia and shivering are associated common complications after spinal anesthesia especially in uroscopic procedures when large amounts of cold intraluminal irrigating fluids are used. Among all adjuvants that have been used in literatures for shivering management, magnesium sulphate and dexmedetomidine were the most effective with least side effects. Our aim of the study is to compare the effect of intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus intrathecal magnesium sulfate in prevention of post spinal shivering. Methods: This prospective randomized, double-blinded controlled study was conducted at Kasr El-Aini Hospital from September 2017 till April 2018, on 105 patients scheduled for uroscopic surgeries. 105 patients were randomly allocated into three groups using computerized generated random tables, Group C (n=35) received 2.5 ml hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (12.5 mg) +0.5 ml normal saline, Group M (n=35) received 2.5 ml hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (12.5 mg) +25 mg magnesium sulfate and Group D (n=35) received 2.5 ml hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (12.5mg) + 5 μg dexmedetomidine in 0.5 ml saline. Primary outcomes were the incidence and intensity of shivering. Secondary outcomes were incidence of hypothermia (Temp < 36° C), sedation, the use of pethidine to control shivering and complications as hypotension, bradycardia, nausea and vomiting. Results: C group showed statistically significant higher number of total patients who developed shivering (21), patients who developed grade IV shivering (20) and patients who needed pethidine (21) to treat shivering than M group (8,5,5) and D group (5,3,6) which were comparable to each other. Time needed to give pethidine after giving the block was similar in the three groups. Hypothermia didn’t occur in any patient in the three groups. The three groups were comparable regarding occurrence of nausea, vomiting, bradycardia & hypotension. All patients of C group, 32 patients in M group and 33 patients in D group had sedation score of 2. 3 patients in M group and 2 patients in D group had a sedation score of 3. Conclusions: intrathecal injection of dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulfate in spinal anesthesia were both effective in reducing the incidence of post spinal shivering. So, we encourage the use of magnesium sulphate being more physiological, readily available in most operating theatres and much cheaper than dexmedetomidine. Clinical trial registration ID: PACTR201801003001727


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
pp. 4289
Author(s):  
Hye-Min Sohn ◽  
Bo-Young Kim ◽  
Yu-Kyung Bae ◽  
Won-Seok Seo ◽  
Young-Tae Jeon

Spine surgery is painful despite the balanced techniques including intraoperative and postoperative opioids use. We investigated the effect of intraoperative magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) on acute pain intensity, analgesic consumption and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) during spine surgery. Seventy-two patients were randomly allocated to two groups: the Mg group or the control group. The pain intensity was significantly alleviated in the Mg group at 24 h (3.2 ± 1.7 vs. 4.4 ± 1.8, p = 0.009) and 48 h (3.0 ± 1.2 vs. 3.8 ± 1.6, p = 0.018) after surgery compared to the control group. Total opioid consumption was reduced by 30% in the Mg group during the same period (p = 0.024 and 0.038, respectively). Patients in the Mg group required less additional doses of rocuronium (0 vs. 6 doses, p = 0.025). Adequate IOM recordings were successfully obtained for all patients, and abnormal IOM results denoting warning criteria (amplitude decrement >50%) were similar. Total intravenous anesthesia with MgSO4 combined with opioid-based conventional pain control enables intraoperative patient immobilization without the need for additional neuromuscular blocking drugs and reduces pain intensity and analgesic requirements for 48 h after spine surgery, which is not achieved with only opioid-based protocol.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document