Review of limb volume measurement techniques in assessing fetal weight by ultrasound with special reference to ImageJ package

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Shripad Hebbar ◽  
Sukriti Malaviya ◽  
Lavanya Rai
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xining Wu ◽  
Zihan Niu ◽  
Zhonghui Xu ◽  
Yuxin Jiang ◽  
Yixiu Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Accurate estimation of fetal weight is important for prenatal care and for detection of fetal growth abnormalities. Prediction of fetal weight entails the indirect measurement of fetal biometry by ultrasound that is then introduced into formulae to calculate the estimated fetal weight. The aim of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of the automated three-dimensional(3D) fractional limb volume model to predict fetal weight in the third trimester.Methods: Prospective 2D and 3D ultrasonography were performed among women with singleton pregnancies 7 days before delivery to obtain 2D data, including fetal biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference and femur length, as well as 3D data, including the fractional arm volume (AVol) and fractional thigh volume (TVol). The fetal weight was estimated using the 2D model and the 3D fractional limb volume model respectively. Percentage error = (estimated fetal weight - actual birth weight) ÷ actual birth weight × 100. Systematic errors (accuracy) were evaluated as the mean percentage error (MPE). Random errors (precision) were calculated as±1 SD of percentage error.Results: Ultrasound examination was performed on 56 fetuses at 39.6 ± 1.4 weeks gestation. The average birth weight of the newborns was 3393 ± 530 g. The average fetal weight estimated by the 2D model was 3478 ± 467 g, and the MPE was 3.2 ± 8.9. The average fetal weights estimated by AVol and TVol of the 3D model were 3268 ± 467 g and 3250 ± 485 g, respectively, and the MPEs were -3.3 ± 6.6 and -3.9 ± 6.1, respectively. For the 3D TVol model, the proportion of fetuses with estimated error ≤ 5% was significantly higher than that of the 2D model (55.4% vs. 33.9%, p < 0.05). For fetuses with a birth weight < 3500 g, the accuracy of the AVol and TVol models were better than the 2D model (-0.8 vs. 7.0 and -2.8 vs. 7.0, both p < 0.05). Moreover, for these fetus, the proportions of estimated error ≤ 5% of the AVol and TVol models were 58.1% and 64.5%, respectively, significantly higher than that of the 2D model (19.4%) (both p < 0.05). The consistency of different examiners measuring fetal AVol and TVol were satisfactory,with the intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.921 and 0.963, respectively.Conclusion: In this cohort,the automated 3D fractional limb volume model improves the accuracy of weight estimation in most third-trimester fetuses. In particular, the 3D model estimation accuracy for fetuses with weight < 3500 g is significantly higher than that of the traditional 2D model.


2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (S1) ◽  
pp. 140-140
Author(s):  
W. Lee ◽  
L.M. Mack ◽  
R. Gandhi ◽  
H. Sangi‐Haghpeykar ◽  
Q. Wu ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. BCBCR.S6128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ragip Kayar ◽  
Serdar Civelek ◽  
Murat Cobanoglu ◽  
Osman Gungor ◽  
Hidayet Catal ◽  
...  

Background To compare breast volume measurement techniques in terms of accuracy, convenience, and cost. Methods Breast volumes of 30 patients who were scheduled to undergo total mastectomy surgery were measured preoperatively by using five different methods (mammography, anatomic [anthropometric], thermoplastic casting, the Archimedes procedure, and the Grossman-Roudner device). Specimen volume after total mastectomy was measured in each patient with the water displacement method (Archimedes). The results were compared statistically with the values obtained by the five different methods. Results The mean mastectomy specimen volume was 623.5 (range 150–1490) mL. The breast volume values were established to be 615.7 mL (r = 0.997) with the mammographic method, 645.4 mL (r = 0.975) with the anthropometric method, 565.8 mL (r = 0.934) with the Grossman-Roudner device, 583.2 mL (r = 0.989) with the Archimedes procedure, and 544.7 mL (r = 0.94) with the casting technique. Examination of r values revealed that the most accurate method was mammography for all volume ranges, followed by the Archimedes method. Conclusion The present study demonstrated that the most accurate method of breast volume measurement is mammography, followed by the Archimedes method. However, when patient comfort, ease of application, and cost were taken into consideration, the Grossman-Roudner device and anatomic measurement were relatively less expensive, and easier methods with an acceptable degree of accuracy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 193-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Bulley ◽  
Fiona Coutts ◽  
Chee Wee Tan

2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 115-121
Author(s):  
D. Stephan ◽  
C. Tavera ◽  
J. Raponsky ◽  
S. Moreau ◽  
D. Weltin ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-161
Author(s):  
TAE-BOK SONG ◽  
THOMAS R. MOORE ◽  
JI-YOUNG LEE ◽  
YOON-HA KIM ◽  
EUN-KYUNG KIM

2016 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 237-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumit K. Banchhor ◽  
Tadashi Araki ◽  
Narendra D. Londhe ◽  
Nobutaka Ikeda ◽  
Petia Radeva ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document