scholarly journals Indonesian Accounting Professionals and ASEAN’s Mutual Recognition Arrangement; An Exploratory Study of Employability Factors

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Mayangsari ◽  
M Hermawan ◽  
V Juwono
Keyword(s):  
Exploratory Study ◽  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
Accounting Professionals ◽  
Mutual Recognition Arrangement

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K4 of the absorbed dose to water standards of the NRC, Canada and the BIPM in 60Co gamma radiation

Metrologia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (1A) ◽  
pp. 06001
Author(s):  
C Kessler ◽  
D Burns ◽  
B Downton ◽  
M McEwen
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
National Research Council ◽  
Absorbed Dose ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Key Comparison ◽  
Radiation Beam ◽  
Main Text ◽  
Mutual Recognition Arrangement ◽  
Absorbed Dose To Water ◽  
60Co Gamma Radiation

Main text A new key comparison of the standards for absorbed dose to water of the National Research Council of Canada (NRC), Canada and the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) was carried out in the 60Co radiation beam of the BIPM in October 2020. The comparison result, based on the calibration coefficients for three transfer standards and evaluated as a ratio of the NRC and the BIPM standards for absorbed dose to water, is 0.9995 with a combined standard uncertainty of 3.4 parts in 103. The result agrees within the uncertainties with the comparison carried out in 2009. The results are analysed and presented in terms of degrees of equivalence, suitable for entry in the BIPM key comparison database. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

APMP key comparison report of air kerma for 137Cs (APMP.RI(I)-K5)

Metrologia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (1A) ◽  
pp. 06003
Author(s):  
I J Kim ◽  
C-Y Yi ◽  
N C Díaz ◽  
S-W Wang ◽  
Y-C Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
National Metrology Institute ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Key Comparison ◽  
Ionization Chambers ◽  
Main Text ◽  
Air Kerma ◽  
Mutual Recognition Arrangement ◽  
Korea Research Institute ◽  
Cipm Mra

Main text The APMP/TCRI Dosimetry Working Group performed the APMP.RI(I)-K5 key comparison of the air kerma for 137Cs in 2014. Five national metrology institutes (NMIs) took part in the comparison. Two commercial ionization chambers were used as transfer instruments and circulated among the participants. The results showed that the maximum difference between the participants and the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, evaluated using the comparison data of the linking laboratories of the Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science and the National Metrology Institute of Japan, was less than 0.5% within the expanded uncertainty. This comparison supports the equivalence of the calibration capabilities of the participating laboratories. The results predate the publication of ICRU report 90, therefore, the revision of the data reflecting the effects of the ICRU report 90 on the degrees of equivalences of the participant laboratories is presented in Appendix C. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Final report on supplementary comparison COOMET.PR-S7: Laser power responsivity (COOMET 599/RU/13)

Metrologia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1A) ◽  
pp. 02005
Author(s):  
Sergey A Moskalyuk ◽  
Anatoly A Liberman ◽  
Joshua Hadler ◽  
Paul Williams
Keyword(s):  
Laser Power ◽  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Key Comparison ◽  
Main Text ◽  
Physical Measurements ◽  
Russian Research Institute ◽  
Mutual Recognition Arrangement ◽  
Cipm Mra ◽  
Detector Head

Main text The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), USA and the All-Russian Research Institute for Optical and Physical Measurements (VNIIOFI), Russia agreed in February 2013 to conduct a comparison on the laser power responsivity at wavelengths of 532 nm, 1.064 μm and 10.6 μm. The aim of this comparison is to assess the equivalence of the laser power responsivity between two laboratories. The comparison was conducted within the COOMET regional metrological organization (COOMET 599/RU/13) and was registered in the BIPM Key Comparison DataBase as a supplementary comparison with the identifier COOMET.PR-S7. The comparison was carried out using one detector head for measuring laser power. The detector head was supplied by VNIIOFI (OPHIR 10A). The results of this comparison essentially demonstrated agreement between the results obtained at the two participating laboratories. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCPR, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

scholarly journals Data inter-comparisons in the context of the knowledge-gaining process: an overview

ACTA IMEKO ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franco Pavese ◽  
Abderafi Charki
Keyword(s):  
Design Of Experiment ◽  
Confidence Level ◽  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
Experimental Measurements ◽  
Testing Laboratories ◽  
Mutual Recognition Arrangement ◽  
Iso 13528 ◽  
Iso 5725 ◽  
Working Method

<p>This paper deals with the principle of data inter-comparisons, the object of which is to increase knowledge continuously with respect to time. Although the principle is as such nothing new to metrology and testing laboratories, which carry out experimental measurements, a degree of clarification is nonetheless called for in view of the numerous questions that arise concerning ways of implementing and utilizing it to improve knowledge capitalization.</p><p>The acquisition of knowledge relative to any measurand involves a series of steps: studying the state of knowledge of the measurand, choosing a working method (typically, by establishing a design of experiment), obtaining the measurements, and analyzing them. Following this, an action plan is established in order to reduce (or if possible avoid) weaknesses or over sensitivity.</p>Comparisons are already conducted using various approaches within a laboratory. It is therefore important to understand that to assess the accuracy of a method and validate it, it is necessary to compare the results obtained by several laboratories for a given method and measurand with the correct type of inter-comparison. It is this comparison between several laboratories that, when using different methods, produces the most up to date knowledge with the highest confidence level. This paper goes over the steps that allow developing knowledge, presenting the aims and characteristics of the various inter-laboratory comparison methods, notably referring to the tools established by documents such as the BIPM MRA (the Mutual Recognition Arrangement), the ISO 5725 and the ISO 13528.

Establishing the International Acceptability of Fluid Quantity and Flow Rate Measurements (Invited Paper)

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
George E. Mattingly
Keyword(s):  
Gas Flow ◽  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
Design Flow ◽  
Key Comparisons ◽  
Liquid Volume ◽  
Flow Measurements ◽  
Measurement Standards ◽  
Regulatory Affairs ◽  
Mutual Recognition Arrangement ◽  
National Measurement

Rapid advances in technology-communications, the internet, tele-marketing, travel, etc. are accelerating the globalization of the world’s market places. To facilitate this globalization by eliminating measurement-based barriers to trade, the International Committee on Weights and Measures (CIPM) has, in accord with the authority granted it by the International Treaty of the Meter, produced a Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA). This MRA, signed into existence in Oct 1999, has the objectives: 1. to establish the degree of equivalence of national measurement standards maintained by the National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) that have signed the MRA, 2. to provide for the mutual recognition of calibration and measurement certificates issued by the NMIs, and thereby 3. to provide governments and other parties with a secure technical foundation for wider agreements regarding measurements that relate to international trade, commerce, and regulatory affairs. Information on the CIPM, and the MRA can be found on the website: http://www.bipm.org/. Degrees of equivalence between and among national measurement standards are based on the results of Key Comparisons (KCs) conducted within the Consultative Committees of the CIPM. Flow measurement efforts are being addressed by the newly formed Working Group for Fluid Flow (WGFF) of the CIPM Consultative Committee on Mass and Related Quantities (CCM). The WGFF efforts are organized into six, specific measurement areas: water, hydrocarbon liquid, air speed, liquid volume, high pressure gas, and low pressure gas flow. In each of these areas, and according to MRA rules, the efforts are to design and conduct KCs that quantify the equivalence of the flow standards maintained in the participating NMIs. To determine appropriate operating ranges for KC’s, the WGFF is reviewing the Calibration and Measurement Capabilities (CMCs) of the participating NMIs. This presentation will briefly describe the MRA and the current WGFF plans and programs to conduct the KC tests. Specific techniques planned for the KCs will be to design flow meter transfer standards comprised of tandem arrangements of flow meters that are tested in the selected fluid and flow conditions to quantify the performance of NMI flow standards under actual conditions of use. Statistically sufficient and metrologically sound test protocols are being devised to efficiently and effectively produce the required data bases. Youden graphical analysis of variance and other statistical techniques are planned to analyze the resulting data. The results of these WGFF efforts are expected to make it feasible for flow measurements made anywhere in the world to be understood and acceptable anywhere else.

Final report on CCQM-K19.2018 key comparison on pH of an unknown borate buffer

Metrologia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1A) ◽  
pp. 08020
Author(s):  
Toshiaki Asakai ◽  
Igor Maksimov ◽  
Sergey Prokunin ◽  
Daria Vengina ◽  
Narine Oganyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ph Value ◽  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
Borate Buffer ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Key Comparison ◽  
Main Text ◽  
Mutual Recognition Arrangement ◽  
Cipm Mra ◽  
Good Agreement

Main text This key comparison CCQM-K19.2018, as a repetition of the previous study CCQM-K19 from 2005, was performed to evaluate the degree of equivalence of measurement procedures of participating National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) and Designated Institutes (DIs) for the determination of pH of borate buffer solutions. The nominal pH value of the buffer was 9.2 at 25 °C and the suggested measurement temperatures were 5 °C, 15 °C, 25 °C, 37 °C and 50 °C. Good agreement of the results is demonstrated by most participants. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document