APMP key comparison report of air kerma for 137Cs (APMP.RI(I)-K5)

Main text The APMP/TCRI Dosimetry Working Group performed the APMP.RI(I)-K5 key comparison of the air kerma for 137Cs in 2014. Five national metrology institutes (NMIs) took part in the comparison. Two commercial ionization chambers were used as transfer instruments and circulated among the participants. The results showed that the maximum difference between the participants and the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, evaluated using the comparison data of the linking laboratories of the Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science and the National Metrology Institute of Japan, was less than 0.5% within the expanded uncertainty. This comparison supports the equivalence of the calibration capabilities of the participating laboratories. The results predate the publication of ICRU report 90, therefore, the revision of the data reflecting the effects of the ICRU report 90 on the degrees of equivalences of the participant laboratories is presented in Appendix C. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K4 of the absorbed dose to water standards of the NRC, Canada and the BIPM in 60Co gamma radiation

Main text A new key comparison of the standards for absorbed dose to water of the National Research Council of Canada (NRC), Canada and the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) was carried out in the 60Co radiation beam of the BIPM in October 2020. The comparison result, based on the calibration coefficients for three transfer standards and evaluated as a ratio of the NRC and the BIPM standards for absorbed dose to water, is 0.9995 with a combined standard uncertainty of 3.4 parts in 103. The result agrees within the uncertainties with the comparison carried out in 2009. The results are analysed and presented in terms of degrees of equivalence, suitable for entry in the BIPM key comparison database. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

A comparison in conventional mass measurements SIM.M.M-S6

Main text The present document reports the results of a bilateral comparison in the calibration of mass standards that was carried out between CESMEC (Chile) and CENAMEP AIP (Panamá). This comparison was carried out in the following nominal values: 200 mg, 1 g, 50 g, 200 g, 1 kg, 2 kg, and 10 kg. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K1 of the air-kerma standards of the NRC, Canada and the BIPM in 60Co gamma radiation

Main text A new key comparison of the standards for air kerma of the National Research Council of Canada (NRC), Canada and the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) was carried out in the 60Co radiation beam of the BIPM in October 2020. The comparison result, based on the calibration coefficients for three transfer chambers and expressed as a ratio of the NRC and the BIPM standards for air kerma, is 1.0022 with a combined standard uncertainty of 2.2 parts in 103. The result agrees within the uncertainties with the indirect comparison carried out in 2009. The results are analysed and presented in terms of degrees of equivalence, suitable for entry in the BIPM key comparison database. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Report on the AFRIMETS.M. F-S1 supplementary force comparison for 10 kN and 100 kN

Main text This bilateral comparison of Force Standard Machines (FSM) named AFRIMETS.M. F-S1 was carried out in the force range from 1 kN to 100 kN between Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) of Germany as the pilot laboratory and Kenya Bureau of Standards (KEBS) of Kenya as the participant laboratory. KEBS had already participated in the APMP.M. F-K2 key comparison where measurements were made only at 50 kN and 100 kN force steps. Therefore, this bilateral comparison was planned to thoroughly compare the KEBS FSM and the PTB Deadweight Machines in wider force steps than those of the APMP.M. F-K2 key comparison and thus it had no corresponding key-comparisons values to be linked to at that time. PTB provided two force transducers for the supplementary comparison with 10 kN and 100 kN nominal capacities. The comparison method called "DKD" procedure was used. This procedure has already been used in several comparisons in Germany and other countries. The purpose to this comparison is to give support to the uncertainty claims for KEBS and will be used to determine the Calibration and Measurement Capability (CMC). In addition, this comparison will provide metrological proof of the application for a CMC entry in the BIPM Key Comparison Database (KCDB). This report describes the scheme and results of the comparison. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Certification of Work Competencies of Port Operational Workers PT. Pelindo III and PT. Pelindo IV in The Mutual Recognition Arrangement

The analyze ability and skills certification of port and TKBM officers in carrying out goods loading and unloading activities at the port, as is known for the many work accidents that often occur at port and TKBM officers due to lack of skills in using tools -the loading and unloading of goods and appropriate work safety equipment in terms of work competency aspects in accordance with SKKNI standards. the type of research to be used is the type of qualitative research. The research location is in PT. Pelindo III Surabaya Branch and the PT. Pelindo IV. The results of the study and discussion it can be concluded that the port operational officer and the port loading and unloading workers in the PT. Pelindo III and PT. Pelindo IV has largely been not certified by the National Professional Certification Agency-Jakarta. Port operational officers and port loading and unloading workers are still equipped with certificates issued by the Indonesian Ministry of Manpower up to each of the Manpower Offices in the PT. Pelindo III and PT. Pelindo IV.

PERLINDUNGAN KONSTITUSIONAL BAGI PEKERJA INDONESIA MENURUT HUKUM KETENAGAKERJAAN PADA ERA MASYARAKAT EKONOMI ASEAN (MEA)

At the end of 2015 the Asean Economic Community agreement came into effect which means that there will be a single ASEAN market and production base that has five basic elements, namely a) free flow of goods, b) free flow of services services), c) free flow of investment, d) free flow of capital, and e) free flow of skilled labor. In addition to the five basic elements, the single market and production base must also contain two important components, namely priority integration sectors (PIS) and the development of the food, agriculture and forestry sectors. In terms of the free flow of labor, not all workers can compete, the ASEAN economic community limits only to skilled workers. Through the 2015 ASEAN economic community, there will be job opportunities throughout ASEAN. Job seekers can easily enter and exit from one country to another without any obstacles from the recipient country. However, the ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint limits only to skilled labor and there is no discussion about unskilled labor. In an effort to support the transfer of skilled workers, all ASEAN member countries signed an MRA (Mutual Recognition Arrangement) on November 19, 2007 consisting of 8 MRAs, including engineering services, architectural services, nurse services ( nursing services), medical practitioners, dental practitioners, accountants services, surveying services, and tourism professionals. So it is feared that Indonesian workers do not compete with foreign workers

Final report on supplementary comparison COOMET.PR-S7: Laser power responsivity (COOMET 599/RU/13)

Main text The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), USA and the All-Russian Research Institute for Optical and Physical Measurements (VNIIOFI), Russia agreed in February 2013 to conduct a comparison on the laser power responsivity at wavelengths of 532 nm, 1.064 μm and 10.6 μm. The aim of this comparison is to assess the equivalence of the laser power responsivity between two laboratories. The comparison was conducted within the COOMET regional metrological organization (COOMET 599/RU/13) and was registered in the BIPM Key Comparison DataBase as a supplementary comparison with the identifier COOMET.PR-S7. The comparison was carried out using one detector head for measuring laser power. The detector head was supplied by VNIIOFI (OPHIR 10A). The results of this comparison essentially demonstrated agreement between the results obtained at the two participating laboratories. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCPR, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Final report on CCQM-K19.2018 key comparison on pH of an unknown borate buffer

Main text This key comparison CCQM-K19.2018, as a repetition of the previous study CCQM-K19 from 2005, was performed to evaluate the degree of equivalence of measurement procedures of participating National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) and Designated Institutes (DIs) for the determination of pH of borate buffer solutions. The nominal pH value of the buffer was 9.2 at 25 °C and the suggested measurement temperatures were 5 °C, 15 °C, 25 °C, 37 °C and 50 °C. Good agreement of the results is demonstrated by most participants. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).