APPLICATION OF FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT TRAVELTIME TOMOGRAPHY (FDTT) TO 2D AND 3D NEAR-SURFACE SEISMIC DATA AT A SHALLOW GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION SITE, RIFLE, CO

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianxiong Chen ◽  
Colin Zelt ◽  
Alan Levander
Keyword(s):  
Groundwater Contamination ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Shallow Groundwater ◽  
Frequency Dependent ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Traveltime Tomography ◽  
2D And 3D

A reality check on full-wave inversion applied to land seismic data for near-surface modeling

2022 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-46
Author(s):  
Öz Yilmaz ◽  
Kai Gao ◽  
Milos Delic ◽  
Jianghai Xia ◽  
Lianjie Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Surface Modeling ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Borehole Data ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Traveltime Tomography ◽  
Wave Inversion ◽  
Full Wave ◽  
Elastic Inversion

We evaluate the performance of traveltime tomography and full-wave inversion (FWI) for near-surface modeling using the data from a shallow seismic field experiment. Eight boreholes up to 20-m depth have been drilled along the seismic line traverse to verify the accuracy of the P-wave velocity-depth model estimated by seismic inversion. The velocity-depth model of the soil column estimated by traveltime tomography is in good agreement with the borehole data. We used the traveltime tomography model as an initial model and performed FWI. Full-wave acoustic and elastic inversions, however, have failed to converge to a velocity-depth model that desirably should be a high-resolution version of the model estimated by traveltime tomography. Moreover, there are significant discrepancies between the estimated models and the borehole data. It is understandable why full-wave acoustic inversion would fail — land seismic data inherently are elastic wavefields. The question is: Why does full-wave elastic inversion also fail? The strategy to prevent full-wave elastic inversion of vertical-component geophone data trapped in a local minimum that results in a physically implausible near-surface model may be cascaded inversion. Specifically, we perform traveltime tomography to estimate a P-wave velocity-depth model for the near-surface and Rayleigh-wave inversion to estimate an S-wave velocity-depth model for the near-surface, then use the resulting pairs of models as the initial models for the subsequent full-wave elastic inversion. Nonetheless, as demonstrated by the field data example here, the elastic-wave inversion yields a near-surface solution that still is not in agreement with the borehole data. Here, we investigate the limitations of FWI applied to land seismic data for near-surface modeling.

scholarly journals Ray-tracing traveltime tomography versus wave-equation traveltime inversion for near-surface seismic land data

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. SO11-SO19
Author(s):  
Lei Fu ◽  
Sherif M. Hanafy
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Ray Tracing ◽  
Water Table ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Water Table Depth ◽  
Seismic Survey ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Traveltime Tomography ◽  
Initial Starting

Full-waveform inversion of land seismic data tends to get stuck in a local minimum associated with the waveform misfit function. This problem can be partly mitigated by using an initial velocity model that is close to the true velocity model. This initial starting model can be obtained by inverting traveltimes with ray-tracing traveltime tomography (RT) or wave-equation traveltime (WT) inversion. We have found that WT can provide a more accurate tomogram than RT by inverting the first-arrival traveltimes, and empirical tests suggest that RT is more sensitive to the additive noise in the input data than WT. We present two examples of applying WT and RT to land seismic data acquired in western Saudi Arabia. One of the seismic experiments investigated the water-table depth, and the other one attempted to detect the location of a buried fault. The seismic land data were inverted by WT and RT to generate the P-velocity tomograms, from which we can clearly identify the water table depth along the seismic survey line in the first example and the fault location in the second example.

Estimation of frequency-dependent near-surface Q factor from cross-hole seismic data

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guofa Li ◽  
Hao Zheng* ◽  
Wenliang Zhu ◽  
Tongli Zhai
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Q Factor ◽  
Frequency Dependent ◽  
Near Surface
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document