The Philosophy of Education and Educational Practice

Author(s):  
Richard Pring
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Zaytsev

The article discusses the innovative method of critical thinking or, more precisely, critical reflection in the field of education, formulated by the American philosopher and twentieth-century educator John Dewey. The author shows that the development of John Dewey of this method has passed practical approbation in a number of American schools, has received positive feedback and has been introduced into the pedagogic and educational practice. The "critical thinking" theory of has not lost its topicality in modern conditions.


Author(s):  
James Scott Johnston

This paper examines the question of philosophy of education’s direction through an examination of its historical self-understandings. The North American, and particularly, U.S. context is highlighted. The thesis is that philosophy of education must reconstruct itself through attention to its past self-understandings, but most importantly, through acceptance of projects, issues, and topics that are relevant to it, and not simply to philosophy or educational practice. Some consequences of this thesis are presented at the end of the paper. Key words: philosophy of education; Dewey's influence; educational theories; historical self-understanding; pragmatism


Author(s):  
Randall R. Curren

The philosophy of education is primarily concerned with the nature, aims and means of education, and also with the character and structure of educational theory, and its own place in that structure. Educational theory is best regarded as a kind of practical theory which would ideally furnish useful guidance for every aspect and office of educational practice. Such guidance would rest in a well-grounded and elaborated account of educational aims and the moral and political dimensions of education, and also in adequate conceptions and knowledge of teaching, learning, evaluation, the structure and dynamics of educational and social systems, the roles of relevant stake-holders and the like. Philosophers of education often approach educational issues from the vantage points of other philosophical sub-disciplines, and contribute in a variety of ways to the larger unfinished project of educational theory. These contributions may be divided into work on the nature and aims of education, on the normative dimensions of the methods and circumstances of education, and on the conceptual and methodological underpinnings of its methods and circumstances – either directly or through work on the foundations of other forms of research relied upon by education theory. Philosophical analysis and argument have suggested certain aims as essential to education, and various movements and branches of philosophy, from Marxism and existentialism to epistemology and ethics, have suggested aims, in every case controversially. Thus, one encounters normative theories of thought, conduct and the aims of education inspired by a broad consideration of epistemology, logic, aesthetics and ethics, as well as Marxism, feminism and a host of other ‘-isms’. In this mode of educational philosophizing, the objects of various branches of philosophical study are proposed as the ends of education, and the significance of pursuing those ends is elaborated with reference to those branches of study. A second form of educational philosophy derives from substantive arguments and theories of ethics, social and political philosophy and philosophy of law, and concerns itself with the aims of education and the acceptability of various means to achieve them. It revolves around arguments concerning the moral, social and political appropriateness of educational aims, initiatives and policies, and moral evaluation of the methods, circumstances and effects of education. Recent debate has been dominated by concerns about children’s rights and freedom, educational equality and justice, moral and political education, and issues of authority, control and professional ethics. The philosophy of education has also sought to guide educational practice through examining its assumptions about the structure of specific knowledge domains and the minds of learners; about learning, development, motivation, and the communication and acquisition of knowledge and understanding. Philosophy of science and mathematics have informed the design of curriculum, pedagogy and evaluation in the teaching of science and mathematics. Philosophy of mind, language and psychology bear on the foundations of our understanding of how learning occurs, and thus how teaching may best promote it.


Author(s):  
С. Ф. Клепко

The paper deals with the interaction of the philosophy of education and education as institutional systems. Hypothetically there are “gravitational”, “weak”, “electromagnetic” and “strong” interactions between the philosophy of education and educational practice. An overview of the interactions between education and the philosophy of education as the production/development of breakthrough methods of designing and creating new educational institutions and systems, new senses, knowledge and technologies is proposed to conduct similarly to 9 types of most important interactions between different populations. It is established that the protocooperation as a form of cohabitation, in which the philosophy of education and education derive some benefits from association, but their coexistence is not obligatory for their survival is dominated in interaction between the philosophy of education and education. The prospect of interaction between the philosophy of education and educational practice based on the model of mutaulism, that is, a connection favorable to the growth and survival of the philosophy of education and education, and none of these institutional systems can exist without the other, is outlined. The relation between philosophy of education and educational practice assumes various interpretations, in particular, it is necessary to distinguish “gravitational”, “weak”, “electromagnetic” and “strong” connections. If consider relation between education and philosophy of education (a production/development of breakthrough design methods and creation of new educational institutes and systems, new senses, knowledge and technologies) by analogy with an ecological theory that set 9 types of the most essential relation between different populations, then such relation between philosophy of education and education is possible to describe as protocooperation, which means that philosophy of education and education get advantages from association, but their coexistence as an institutional system is not obligatory for their institutional functioning. It harms both the philosophy of education and the development of education in general. Hence, the perspective of cooperation between philosophy of education and educational practice is seen as an example of mutualism, that is a beneficial connection to the increase and survival of the philosophy of education and education, while none of these institutional systems can exist without one another.


Author(s):  
Randall R. Curren

The philosophy of education may be considered a branch of practical philosophy, aimed ultimately at the guidance of an important aspect of human affairs. Its questions thus arise more or less directly from the features of educational practice and the role of education in the promotion of individual and social wellbeing, however much its answers may be conditioned by the larger philosophical and historical settings in which they are posed. Philosophers have concerned themselves with what the aims of education should be, and through what forms of instruction, inquiry and practice those aims might be attained. This demands attention to the contents of instruction and who shall have authority over it. It demands attention to the nature of instruction itself, its epistemic dimensions and what is entailed by its reliance on language; the nature of learning and human development, both moral and intellectual; and how all of these are interrelated. The philosophy of education thus stands at the intersection of moral and political philosophy, epistemology, and the philosophy of mind and language, as they bear on the foundations of educational practice. The philosophy of education began in classical antiquity with the challenges posed by Socrates to the educational claims of the sophists. Plato and Aristotle developed systematic theories of education guided by an ethic of justice and self-restraint, and by the goal of promoting social harmony and the happiness or wellbeing of all citizens. The Stoic descendants of Socrates were expelled from Rome and the oratorical model of higher education given official sanction, but Augustine re-established the philosophical model through a synthesis of Platonism and Christianity, and in his mature educational thought brought elements of the oratorical and Platonic models together in his account of the Christian teacher’s training. The religious wars of the Reformation inspired several philosophical stances toward the relationships of Church, state, school and conscience. Hobbes argued for a consolidation of ecclesiastical and civil authority, with full sovereign authority over education; Locke for liberty, religious toleration, and private education aiming at self-governance in accordance with reason; and Rousseau not just for the free development and exercise of the full array of human faculties, but for the establishment of a civic religion limited to the core of shared Christian beliefs which Enlightenment figures from Descartes onward had thought evident to natural reason. The Enlightenment’s embrace of science and reason yielded efforts towards the development of a science of learning and pedagogy in the nineteenth century, but Rousseau’s romantic reaction to it and defence of democracy were also powerful influences. In the twentieth century, Dewey produced a new synthesis of Enlightenment and Rousseauian themes, drawing on Hegel, the experimentalism of Mill, evolutionary theory and psychology, and aspects of the substance and intent of Rousseau’s pedagogy.


Philosophy ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 65 (251) ◽  
pp. 65-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Haldane

‘Every education teaches a philosophy; if not by dogma then by suggestion, by implication, by atmosphere. Every part of that education has a connection with every other part. If it does not all combine to convey some general view of life it is not education at all’ (Chesterton).In an essay written for the thirtieth volume of the British Journal of Educational Studies, R. F. Dearden surveyed philosophy of education during the period 1952–82. As might be imagined he was largely concerned with the emergence in and development through these years of analytical philosophy of education, as the influence of linguistic or conceptual analysis spread beyond the somewhat ill-defined boundaries of core philosophy and was taken up by those interested in the theoretical presuppositions of educational practice. After charting the course of this development, and having reached the point at which certain worries arose about the limits of conceptual analysis as a method, Dearden turned to consider what if any alternatives might be available. The first possibility which he mentions in expectation of its having received explicit articulation is Catholic philosophy of education. However, as he notes, nothing meeting this description was developed during the period in question—in effect, since the war. The one book which he mentions, viz. Jacques Maritain's Education at the Crossroads, is barely known of in professional philosophy of education and in style and content is quite out of the mainstream.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document