Setting School Calendars: Providing Time for Educator Learning

Keyword(s):  
2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
April Barnett ◽  
Kelly Charlton ◽  
Harris Cooper ◽  
Jeff Valentine

2003 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harris Cooper ◽  
Jeffrey C. Valentine ◽  
Kelly Charlton ◽  
April Melson

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 46-50
Author(s):  
David T. Marshall ◽  
David M. Shannon ◽  
Savanna M. Love

The COVID-19 viral pandemic affected all facets of life, including schooling. In March 2020, schools abruptly ended face-to-face instruction and transitioned to emergency remote instruction. David Marshall, David Shannon, and Savanna Love surveyed teachers nationally between mid-March and early April 2020 to understand their experiences during this time. Teachers found all aspects of teaching more challenging during remote instruction and shared a range of experiences related to training opportunities, barriers to student learning, as well as support for English learners and students with special needs. Based on the teachers’ comments, the authors recommend incorporating digital learning days in future school calendars and putting clear plans in place for future emergencies.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul N. Thompson ◽  
Katherine Gunter ◽  
John M. Schuna ◽  
Emily J. Tomayko

Four-day school weeks are used in over 1,600 schools across 24 states, but little is known about adoption and implementation of these types of school calendars. Through examinations of school calendars and correspondence with school districts, we have compiled the most complete four-day school week dataset to date. We use this unique database to conduct a comprehensive analysis of four-day school week policy adoption and implementation. We find adoption of four-day school weeks is often financially-motivated and has generally remained a small, rural district phenomenon. These schedules feature a day off once a week – often Friday – with increased time in school on each of the remaining four school days that, on average, is nearly an hour longer than the national average among five-day schools. Four-day school week schedules average only 148 yearly school days, yielding yearly time in school that is below the national average for five-day schools despite the longer school days. Substantial heterogeneity exists in the structure of these schedules across states, which may help explain differential four-day school week effects on student outcomes across institutional settings in the previous literature.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 590-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramona K. C. Finnie ◽  
Yinan Peng ◽  
Robert A. Hahn ◽  
Robert L. Johnson ◽  
Jonathan E. Fielding ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 300-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Graves ◽  
Steven McMullen ◽  
Kathryn Rouse

In the face of school crowding and fears about inequality-inducing summer learning loss, many schools have started to adopt multi-track year-round school calendars, which keep the same number of school days, but spread them more evenly across the calendar year. This change allows schools to support a larger student population by rotating which students are on break at any point in time. While year-round schooling can save money, the impact on academic achievement is uncertain and only recently have large-scale studies become available for policy makers. This brief examines research on the effects of multi-track year-round schooling, focusing on two rigorously executed case studies. This research gives little support for claims that year-round schooling will boost student achievement. Except as a remedy for highly over-crowded schools, year-round schooling seems to have little impact on achievement, and has even been shown to decrease achievement, especially among the most high-risk student populations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document