Ethics and Financial Services: Has the industry learned from the global crisis?

Author(s):  
S.L. Mintz
2017 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean‐François Bégin ◽  
Mathieu Boudreault ◽  
Delia Alexandra Doljanu ◽  
Geneviève Gauthier

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 933-946
Author(s):  
Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy

The purpose of this paper is to present a set of comparative corporate governance standards in some Middle East countries including: Turkey, UAE, Saudi Arabia plus IIFS Code (Institutions offering Islamic financial services). There are strengths and weaknesses in these codes or practices which will be identified in this paperwork. Therefore, this paper not only identifies different points in latest corporate governance standard principles and systems in the above three (3) countries, but also provides with a summary of evaluation of current corporate governance systems in these above countries which may enable relevant organizations in re-evaluating their current ones. Last but not least, it aims to illustrate a limited comparative set of standards of Middle East corporate governance, and give proper recommendations to relevant governments and institutions toward a sustainable practices in business life.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youssef Mohamed Riahi

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of discretionary loan loss provisions (DLLPs) and non-performing loans (NPLs) on the liquidity risk of both Islamic banks (IBs) and conventional banks (CBs) before and after the global crisis that hit nations belonging to the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC).Design/methodology/approachThis empirical study uses balanced panel data on 16 IBs and 58 CBs operating in the six Gulf Cooperation states covering 2000–2014. The data were obtained from the Bankscope database and the banks’ annual reports.FindingsThe results indicate that NPLs affect liquidity risk differently across the banks – specifically, there is a significant difference in the funding and managing of liquidity between the two bank types. The authors find that the influence of DLLPs does not vary across the banks in the overall analysis and before the crisis. This finding provides insights into the unique nature of banking risks in dual banking systems. The authors also find that after the crisis, the discretionary LLPs affected liquidity risk differently across the banks.Practical implicationsThis study has several practical implications. First, the findings suggest that the Islamic Financial Services Board and other IBs regulators should reassess several regulations, principles and products in order to reduce their credit and liquidity risks. Second, the study emphasizes the need for banks to perform a careful assessment of the effects of their LLP policies. Finally, the findings are also relevant to bankers, as they provide empirical evidence on the effect of loan growth on bank liquidity, suggesting that bankers should improve their loan management.Originality/valueFirst, this is the first study to examine discretionary LLPs, NPLs and liquidity risk in IBs; it is also the first comparative study between Islamic and CBs. Second, the study provides evidence on how the global crisis impacted the banking sector and identifies some of the main determinants of liquidity risk for both Islamic and CBs operating in GCC countries.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (06) ◽  
pp. 44-44
Author(s):  
Kai-Otto Landwehr

Der globale Anstieg von chronischen Erkrankungen setzt Krankenhäuser unter Druck. Die digitale Transformation trägt zur Entlastung bei, denn sie schafft ‚smarte‘, also intelligente Krankenhäuser. Es gibt sie jedoch nicht umsonst. Woher das Geld dafür nehmen und nicht stehlen? Kai-Otto Landwehr, Leiter des Commercial-Finance-Geschäfts von Siemens Financial Services (SFS), weiß Rat.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document