scholarly journals Long-term Exposure to PM10 Increases Lung Cancer Risks: A Cohort Analysis

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Woo Lee ◽  
Sung-Chan Kang ◽  
Sun-Young Kim ◽  
Young-Jae Cho ◽  
Seung-sik Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Cancer Risks

scholarly journals Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is feasible for selected patients with clinical N2 non-small cell lung cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Kwang Yun ◽  
Geun Dong Lee ◽  
Sehoon Choi ◽  
Hyeong Ryul Kim ◽  
Yong-Hee Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Open Thoracotomy ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Advanced Stage Lung Cancer

Abstract Few studies have evaluated the usefulness of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for advanced-stage lung cancer. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of VATS for treating clinical N2 (cN2) lung cancer. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed with data from 268 patients who underwent lobectomy for cN2 disease from 2007 to 2016. Using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), perioperative and long-term survival outcomes were compared. We performed VATS and open thoracotomy on 121 and 147 patients, respectively. Overall, VATS was preferred for patients with peripherally located tumors (p < 0.001). After IPTW-adjustment, all preoperative information became similar between the groups. Compared to thoracotomy, VATS was associated with shorter hospitalization (7.7 days vs. 9.1 days, p = 0.028), despite equivalent complete resection rates (92.6% vs. 90.5%, p = 0.488) and dissected lymph nodes (mean, 31.9 vs. 29.4, p = 0.100). On IPTW-adjusted analysis, overall survival (50.5% vs. 48.4%, p = 0.127) and recurrence-free survival (60.5% vs 44.6%, p = 0.069) at 5 years were also similar between the groups. Among selected patients with resectable cN2 disease and peripherally located tumors, VATS is feasible, associated with shorter hospitalization and comparable perioperative and long-term survival outcomes, compared with open thoracotomy.

scholarly journals Adherence to follow-up recommendation guidelines in long term breast cancer survivors, a SURBCAN cohort analysis using administrative databases

The Breast ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. S80-S81
Author(s):  
P. Santiá ◽  
A. Jansana ◽  
T. Sanz ◽  
I. de la Cura ◽  
M. Padilla-Ruiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Administrative Databases

scholarly journals Robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung lobectomy or segmentectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianglei Ma ◽  
Xiaoyao Li ◽  
Shifu Zhao ◽  
Jiawei Wang ◽  
Wujia Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Conversion Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Short Term

Abstract Background It remains no clear conclusion about which is better between robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the short-term and long-term efficacy between RATS and VATS for NSCLC. Methods Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Medline, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched for studies published before December 2020. The quality of the articles was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the data analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 software. Fixed or random effect models were applied according to heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted. Results A total of 18 studies including 11,247 patients were included in the meta-analyses, of which 5114 patients were in the RATS group and 6133 in the VATS group. Compared with VATS, RATS was associated with less blood loss (WMD = − 50.40, 95% CI -90.32 ~ − 10.48, P = 0.010), lower conversion rate (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.43 ~ 0.60, P < 0.001), more harvested lymph nodes (WMD = 1.72, 95% CI 0.63 ~ 2.81, P = 0.002) and stations (WMD = 0.51, 95% CI 0.15 ~ 0.86, P = 0.005), shorter duration of postoperative chest tube drainage (WMD = − 0.61, 95% CI -0.78 ~ − 0.44, P < 0.001) and hospital stay (WMD = − 1.12, 95% CI -1.58 ~ − 0.66, P < 0.001), lower overall complication rate (OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.83 ~ 0.99, P = 0.020), lower recurrence rate (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.36 ~ 0.72, P < 0.001), and higher cost (WMD = 3909.87 USD, 95% CI 3706.90 ~ 4112.84, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between RATS and VATS in operative time, mortality, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Sensitivity analysis showed that no significant differences were found between the two techniques in conversion rate, number of harvested lymph nodes and stations, and overall complication. Conclusions The results revealed that RATS is a feasible and safe technique compared with VATS in terms of short-term and long-term outcomes. Moreover, more randomized controlled trials comparing the two techniques with rigorous study designs are still essential to evaluate the value of robotic surgery for NSCLC.

scholarly journals Validation of the T Descriptor (TNM-8) in T3N0 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients; a Bicentric Cohort Analysis with Arguments for Redefinition

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1812
Author(s):  
Philip Baum ◽  
Samantha Taber ◽  
Stella Erdmann ◽  
Thomas Muley ◽  
Mark Kriegsmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Lung Cancer Surgery ◽  
Tnm Staging ◽  
Parietal Pleura ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Multiple Nodules

The current pT3N0 category represents a heterogeneous subgroup involving tumor size, separate tumor nodes in one lobe, and locoregional growth pattern. We aim to validate outcomes according to the eighth edition of the TNM staging classification. A total of 281 patients who had undergone curative lung cancer surgery staged with TNM-7 in two German centers were retrospectively analyzed. The subtypes tumor size >7 cm and multiple nodules were grouped as T3a, and the subtypes parietal pleura invasion and mixed were grouped as T3b. We stratified survival by subtype and investigated the relative benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy according to subtype. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates differed between the different subtypes tumor diameter >7 cm (71.5%), multiple nodules in one lobe (71.0%) (grouped as T3a), parietal pleura invasion (59.%), and mixed subtype (5-year OS 50.3%) (grouped as T3b), respectively. The cohort as a whole did not gain significant OS benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. In contrast, adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved OS in the T3b subgroup (logrank p = 0.03). This multicenter cohort analysis of pT3N0 patients identifies a new prognostic mixed subtype. Tumors >7 cm should not be moved to pT4. Patients with T3b tumors have significantly worse survival than patients with T3a tumors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document