scholarly journals Nucleosome sliding mechanism based on the potential energy of sequence

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (03) ◽  
pp. 269-276
Author(s):  
Hu Meng ◽  
Hong Li ◽  
Zhenhua Yang ◽  
Yangming Si
2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (24) ◽  
pp. 10965-10974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Korber ◽  
Tim Luckenbach ◽  
Dorothea Blaschke ◽  
Wolfram Hörz

ABSTRACT The yeast PHO5 promoter is a model system for the role of chromatin in eukaryotic gene regulation. Four positioned nucleosomes in the repressed state give way to an extended DNase I hypersensitive site upon induction. Recently this hypersensitive site was shown to be devoid of histone DNA contacts. This raises the mechanistic question of how histones are removed from the promoter. A displacement in trans or movement in cis, the latter according to the well established nucleosome sliding mechanism, are the major alternatives. In this study, we embedded the PHO5 promoter into the context of a small plasmid which severely restricts the space for nucleosome sliding along the DNA in cis. Such a construct would either preclude the chromatin transition upon induction altogether, were it to occur in cis, or gross changes in chromatin around the plasmid would be the consequence. We observed neither. Instead, promoter opening on the plasmid was indistinguishable from opening at the native chromosomal locus. This makes a sliding mechanism for the chromatin transition at the PHO5 promoter highly unlikely and points to histone eviction in trans.


Author(s):  
H. Mohri

In 1959, Afzelius observed the presence of two rows of arms projecting from each outer doublet microtubule of the so-called 9 + 2 pattern of cilia and flagella, and suggested a possibility that the outer doublet microtubules slide with respect to each other with the aid of these arms during ciliary and flagellar movement. The identification of the arms as an ATPase, dynein, by Gibbons (1963)strengthened this hypothesis, since the ATPase-bearing heads of myosin molecules projecting from the thick filaments pull the thin filaments by cross-bridge formation during muscle contraction. The first experimental evidence for the sliding mechanism in cilia and flagella was obtained by examining the tip patterns of molluscan gill cilia by Satir (1965) who observed constant length of the microtubules during ciliary bending. Further evidence for the sliding-tubule mechanism was given by Summers and Gibbons (1971), using trypsin-treated axonemal fragments of sea urchin spermatozoa. Upon the addition of ATP, the outer doublets telescoped out from these fragments and the total length reached up to seven or more times that of the original fragment. Thus, the arms on a certain doublet microtubule can walk along the adjacent doublet when the doublet microtubules are disconnected by digestion of the interdoublet links which connect them with each other, or the radial spokes which connect them with the central pair-central sheath complex as illustrated in Fig. 1. On the basis of these pioneer works, the sliding-tubule mechanism has been established as one of the basic mechanisms for ciliary and flagellar movement.


1994 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 905-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Panella ◽  
J. Suzanne ◽  
P. N. M. Hoang ◽  
C. Girardet

1983 ◽  
Vol 44 (C3) ◽  
pp. C3-447-C3-450
Author(s):  
E. Cernia ◽  
L. D'Ilario ◽  
G. Nencini

2009 ◽  
pp. 107-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Bashmakov

On the eve of the worldwide negotiations of a new climate agreement in December 2009 in Copenhagen it is important to clearly understand what Russia can do to mitigate energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the medium (until 2020) and in the long term (until 2050). The paper investigates this issue using modeling tools and scenario approach. It concludes that transition to the "Low-Carbon Russia" scenarios must be accomplished in 2020—2030 or sooner, not only to mitigate emissions, but to block potential energy shortages and its costliness which can hinder economic growth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document