Weak Containment and Induced Representations of Groups

1962 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 237-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. G. Fell

Let G be a locally compact group and G† its dual space, that is, the set of all unitary equivalence classes of irreducible unitary representations of G. An important tool for investigating the group algebra of G is the so-called hull-kernel topology of G†, which is discussed in (3) as a special case of the relation of weak containment. The question arises: Given a group G, how do we determine G† and its topology? For many groups G, Mackey's theory of induced representations permits us to catalogue all the elements of G†. One suspects that by suitably supplementing this theory it should be possible to obtain the topology of G† at the same time. It is the purpose of this paper to explore this possibility. Unfortunately, we are not able to complete the programme at present.

2018 ◽  
Vol 2020 (7) ◽  
pp. 2034-2053
Author(s):  
Matthew Wiersma

Abstract A QSIN group is a locally compact group G whose group algebra $\mathrm L^{1}(G)$ admits a quasi-central bounded approximate identity. Examples of QSIN groups include every amenable group and every discrete group. It is shown that if G is a QSIN group, H is a closed subgroup of G, and $\pi \!: H\to \mathcal B(\mathcal{H})$ is a unitary representation of H, then $\pi$ is weakly contained in $\Big (\mathrm{Ind}_{H}^{G}\pi \Big )|_{H}$. This provides a powerful tool in studying the C*-algebras of QSIN groups. In particular, it is shown that if G is a QSIN group which contains a copy of $\mathbb{F}_{2}$ as a closed subgroup, then $\mathrm C^{\ast }(G)$ is not locally reflexive and $\mathrm C^{\ast }_{r}(G)$ does not admit the local lifting property. Further applications are drawn to the “(weak) extendability” of Fourier spaces $\mathrm A_{\pi }$ and Fourier–Stieltjes spaces $\mathrm B_{\pi }$.


Author(s):  
Michael Cowling

AbstractLet G be a locally compact group, and let D(G) be a dense subalgebra of the convolution algebra L1(G). Suppose that π is a unitary representation of G and that, for each u in D(G), π(u)) is a trace-class operator. Then the linear functional u → tr(π(u)) (the trace of π(u)) is called the D-character of π. We give a simple proof that the D-character of such a representation determines the representation up to unitary equivalence. As an application, we give an easy proof of the result of Harish-Chandra that the K-finite characters of unitary representations of semisimple Lie groups determine the representations.


2002 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-259
Author(s):  
ASTRID AN HUEF ◽  
IAIN RAEBURN

Mackey's imprimitivity theorem characterizes the unitary representations of a locally compact group G which have been induced from representations of a closed subgroup K; Rieffel's influential reformulation says that the group C*-algebra C*(K) is Morita equivalent to the crossed product C0(G/K)×G [14]. There have since been many important generalizations of this theorem, especially by Rieffel [15, 16] and by Green [3, 4]. These are all special cases of the symmetric imprimitivity theorem of [11], which gives a Morita equivalence between two crossed products of induced C*-algebras.


2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (05n06) ◽  
pp. 1261-1272 ◽  
Author(s):  
WOLFGANG WOESS

Let L≀X be a lamplighter graph, i.e., the graph-analogue of a wreath product of groups, and let P be the transition operator (matrix) of a random walk on that structure. We explain how methods developed by Saloff-Coste and the author can be applied for determining the ℓp-norms and spectral radii of P, if one has an amenable (not necessarily discrete or unimodular) locally compact group of isometries that acts transitively on L. This applies, in particular, to wreath products K≀G of finitely-generated groups, where K is amenable. As a special case, this comprises a result of Żuk regarding the ℓ2-spectral radius of symmetric random walks on such groups.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eirik Berge

AbstractCoorbit theory is a powerful machinery that constructs a family of Banach spaces, the so-called coorbit spaces, from well-behaved unitary representations of locally compact groups. A core feature of coorbit spaces is that they can be discretized in a way that reflects the geometry of the underlying locally compact group. Many established function spaces such as modulation spaces, Besov spaces, Sobolev–Shubin spaces, and shearlet spaces are examples of coorbit spaces. The goal of this survey is to give an overview of coorbit theory with the aim of presenting the main ideas in an accessible manner. Coorbit theory is generally seen as a complicated theory, filled with both technicalities and conceptual difficulties. Faced with this obstacle, we feel obliged to convince the reader of the theory’s elegance. As such, this survey is a showcase of coorbit theory and should be treated as a stepping stone to more complete sources.


1972 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1043-1051
Author(s):  
T. H. McH. Hanson

In [4], Hofmann defines a locally compact group with zero as a Hausdorff locally compact topological semigroup, S, with a non-isolated point, 0, such that G = S — {0} is a group. He shows there that 0 is indeed a zero for 5, G is a locally compact topological group, and the identity of G is the identity of S. The author has investigated actions of such semigroups on locally compact spaces in [1; 2]. In this paper, we are investigating direct products of semigroups of the above type and actions of these products; for a special case of this, the reader is referred to [3].


2011 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-185
Author(s):  
RASOUL NASR-ISFAHANI ◽  
SIMA SOLTANI RENANI

AbstractFor a locally compact group G, let LUC(G) denote the space of all left uniformly continuous functions on G. Here, we investigate projectivity, injectivity and flatness of LUC(G) and its dual space LUC(G)* as Banach left modules over the group algebra as well as the measure algebra of G.


1980 ◽  
Vol 78 ◽  
pp. 95-111
Author(s):  
Hitoshi Kaneta

Since the representations of SL(2, C) induced by irreducible unitary representations of appear as the restriction to the Lorentz group of some irreducible unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group, the decomposition of the induced representations deserves our investigation. For the representations of SL(2, C) induced by irreducible unitary representations with discrete spin of E(2), the decomposition has been obtained by Mukunda [9]. We hope that our analysis will justify the calculations by Chakrabarti [1], [2] and [3].


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document