An Inequality Between Numerical Homotopy Invariants

1968 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 1295-1299
Author(s):  
M. J. M. Priddis

In (1), Berstein and Ganea denned the nilpotency class of a based topological space. For a based topological space X we write nil X for the nilpotency class of the group ΩX in the category of based topological spaces and based homotopy classes. Hilton, in (3), defined the nilpotency class, nil class K of a based semi-simplicial (s.-s.) complex; actually, the restriction of connectedness can be removed. Hence, by using the total singular complex functor S, an invariant (nil class SX) can be defined for a based topological space X.

1970 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1129-1132
Author(s):  
William J. Gilbert

Let cat be the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category structure as defined by Whitehead [6] and let be the category structure as defined by Ganea [2],We prove thatandIt is known that w ∑ cat X = conil X for connected X. Dually, if X is simply connected,1. We work in the category of based topological spaces with the based homotopy type of CW-complexes and based homotopy classes of maps. We do not distinguish between a map and its homotopy class. Constant maps are denoted by 0 and identity maps by 1.We recall some notions from Peterson's theory of structures [5; 1] which unify the definitions of the numerical homotopy invariants akin to the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category.


Filomat ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 1403-1429
Author(s):  
Zadeh Ayatollah ◽  
Fatemeh Ebrahimifar ◽  
Mohammad Mahmoodi

Suppose ? is a nonzero cardinal number, I is an ideal on arc connected Topological space X, and B?I(X) is the subgroup of ?1(X) (the first fundamental group of X) generated by homotopy classes of ?_I loops. The main aim of this text is to study B?I(X)s and compare them. Most interest is in ? ? {?,c} and I ? {Pfin(X), {?}}, where Pfin(X) denotes the collection of all finite subsets of X. We denote B?{?}(X) with B?(X). We prove the following statements: for arc connected topological spaces X and Y if B?(X) is isomorphic to B?(Y) for all infinite cardinal number ?, then ?1(X) is isomorphic to ?1(Y); there are arc connected topological spaces X and Y such that ?1(X) is isomorphic to ?1(Y) but B?(X) is not isomorphic to B?(Y); for arc connected topological space X we have B?(X) ? Bc(X) ? ?1(X); for Hawaiian earring X, the sets B?(X), Bc(X), and ?1(X) are pairwise distinct. So B?(X)s and B?I(X)s will help us to classify the class of all arc connected topological spaces with isomorphic fundamental groups.


Symmetry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1039
Author(s):  
Susmit Bagchi

The fundamental groups and homotopy decompositions of algebraic topology have applications in systems involving symmetry breaking with topological excitations. The main aim of this paper is to analyze the properties of homotopy decompositions in quotient topological spaces depending on the connectedness of the space and the fundamental groups. This paper presents constructions and analysis of two varieties of homotopy decompositions depending on the variations in topological connectedness of decomposed subspaces. The proposed homotopy decomposition considers connected fundamental groups, where the homotopy equivalences are relaxed and the homeomorphisms between the fundamental groups are maintained. It is considered that one fundamental group is strictly homotopy equivalent to a set of 1-spheres on a plane and as a result it is homotopy rigid. The other fundamental group is topologically homeomorphic to the first one within the connected space and it is not homotopy rigid. The homotopy decompositions are analyzed in quotient topological spaces, where the base space and the quotient space are separable topological spaces. In specific cases, the decomposed quotient space symmetrically extends Sierpinski space with respect to origin. The connectedness of fundamental groups in the topological space is maintained by open curve embeddings without enforcing the conditions of homotopy classes on it. The extended decomposed quotient topological space preserves the trivial group structure of Sierpinski space.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 250-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Fritz

Abstract In this short note, we prove that the stochastic order of Radon probability measures on any ordered topological space is antisymmetric. This has been known before in various special cases. We give a simple and elementary proof of the general result.


Author(s):  
B. J. Day ◽  
G. M. Kelly

We are concerned with the category of topological spaces and continuous maps. A surjection f: X → Y in this category is called a quotient map if G is open in Y whenever f−1G is open in X. Our purpose is to answer the following three questions:Question 1. For which continuous surjections f: X → Y is every pullback of f a quotient map?Question 2. For which continuous surjections f: X → Y is f × lz: X × Z → Y × Z a quotient map for every topological space Z? (These include all those f answering to Question 1, since f × lz is the pullback of f by the projection map Y ×Z → Y.)Question 3. For which topological spaces Z is f × 1Z: X × Z → Y × Z a qiptoent map for every quotient map f?


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Amit Kumar Singh ◽  
Rekha Srivastava

In this paper we have studied separation axiomsTi,i=0,1,2in an intuitionistic fuzzy topological space introduced by Coker. We also show the existence of functorsℬ:IF-Top→BF-Topand𝒟:BF-Top→IF-Topand observe that𝒟is left adjoint toℬ.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dipankar Dey ◽  
Dhananjay Mandal ◽  
Manabendra Nath Mukherjee

PurposeThe present article deals with the initiation and study of a uniformity like notion, captioned μ-uniformity, in the context of a generalized topological space.Design/methodology/approachThe existence of uniformity for a completely regular topological space is well-known, and the interrelation of this structure with a proximity is also well-studied. Using this idea, a structure on generalized topological space has been developed, to establish the same type of compatibility in the corresponding frameworks.FindingsIt is proved, among other things, that a μ-uniformity on a non-empty set X always induces a generalized topology on X, which is μ-completely regular too. In the last theorem of the paper, the authors develop a relation between μ-proximity and μ-uniformity by showing that every μ-uniformity generates a μ-proximity, both giving the same generalized topology on the underlying set.Originality/valueIt is an original work influenced by the previous works that have been done on generalized topological spaces. A kind of generalization has been done in this article, that has produced an intermediate structure to the already known generalized topological spaces.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemah Ayatollah Zadeh Shirazi ◽  
Meysam Miralaei ◽  
Fariba Zeinal Zadeh Farhadi

In the following text, we want to study the behavior of one point compactification operator in the chain Ξ := {Metrizable, Normal, T2, KC, SC, US, T1, TD, TUD, T0, Top} of subcategories of category of topological spaces, Top (where we denote the subcategory of Top, containing all topological spaces with property P , simply by P). Actually we want to know, for P∈Ξ and X∈P, the one point compactification of topological space X belongs to which elements of Ξ. Finally we find out that the chain {Metrizable, T2, KC, SC, US, T1, TD, TUD, T0, Top} is a forwarding chain with respect to one point compactification operator.


2001 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 505-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Carlos Rodríguez Alcantud

We extend van Dalen and Wattel's (1973) characterization of orderable spaces and their subspaces by obtaining analogous results for two larger classes of topological spaces. This type of spaces are defined by considering preferences instead of linear orders in the former definitions, and possess topological properties similar to those of (totally) orderable spaces (cf. Alcantud, 1999). Our study provides particular consequences of relevance in mathematical economics; in particular, a condition equivalent to the existence of a continuous preference on a topological space is obtained.


2004 ◽  
Vol 2004 (70) ◽  
pp. 3829-3837
Author(s):  
Doğan Çoker ◽  
A. Haydar Eş ◽  
Necla Turanli

The purpose of this paper is to prove a Tychonoff theorem in the so-called “intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces.” After giving the fundamental definitions, such as the definitions of intuitionistic fuzzy set, intuitionistic fuzzy topology, intuitionistic fuzzy topological space, fuzzy continuity, fuzzy compactness, and fuzzy dicompactness, we obtain several preservation properties and some characterizations concerning fuzzy compactness. Lastly we give a Tychonoff-like theorem.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document