Vector Fields and the Cohomology Ring of Toric Varieties

2005 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 414-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiumars Kaveh
Keyword(s):  
Vector Field ◽  
Vector Fields ◽  
Projective Variety ◽  
Cohomology Ring ◽  
Holomorphic Vector Field ◽  
Zero Set ◽  
Graded Algebras ◽  
Smooth Complex ◽  
Complex Projective Variety ◽  
Complex Projective

AbstractLetXbe a smooth complex projective variety with a holomorphic vector field with isolated zero setZ. From the results of Carrell and Lieberman there exists a filtrationF0⊂F1⊂ · · · ofA(Z), the ring of ℂ-valued functions onZ, such thatas graded algebras. In this note, for a smooth projective toric variety and a vector field generated by the action of a 1-parameter subgroup of the torus, we work out this filtration. Our main result is an explicit connection between this filtration and the polytope algebra ofX.

scholarly journals Hyperbolicity related problems for complete intersection varieties

2013 ◽  
Vol 150 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damian Brotbek
Keyword(s):  
Projective Space ◽  
Existence Theorem ◽  
Complete Intersection ◽  
Cotangent Bundle ◽  
Projective Variety ◽  
Complete Intersections ◽  
Smooth Complex ◽  
Complex Projective Variety ◽  
Complex Projective ◽  
Intersection Surface

AbstractIn this paper we examine different problems regarding complete intersection varieties of high multidegree in a smooth complex projective variety. First we prove an existence theorem for jet differential equations that generalizes a theorem of Diverio. Then we show how one can deduce hyperbolicity for generic complete intersections of high multidegree and high codimension from the known results on hypersurfaces. Finally, motivated by a conjecture of Debarre, we focus on the positivity of the cotangent bundle of complete intersections, and prove some results towards this conjecture; among other things, we prove that a generic complete intersection surface of high multidegree in a projective space of dimension at least four has an ample cotangent bundle.

Ample Vector Bundles of Curve Genus One

1999 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Lanteri ◽  
Hidetoshi Maeda
Keyword(s):  
Vector Bundle ◽  
Vector Bundles ◽  
Projective Variety ◽  
Ample Vector Bundle ◽  
Smooth Complex ◽  
Complex Projective Variety ◽  
Curve Genus ◽  
Genus One ◽  
Complex Projective ◽  
Zero Locus

AbstractWe investigate the pairs (X, ε) consisting of a smooth complex projective variety X of dimension n and an ample vector bundle ε of rank n − 1 on X such that ε has a section whose zero locus is a smooth elliptic curve.

scholarly journals Rank 3 rigid representations of projective fundamental groups

2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (7) ◽  
pp. 1534-1570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Langer ◽  
Carlos Simpson
Keyword(s):  
Irreducible Representation ◽  
Projective Variety ◽  
Fundamental Groups ◽  
Projective Varieties ◽  
Smooth Complex ◽  
Complex Projective Variety ◽  
Geometric Origin ◽  
Rank 2 ◽  
Complex Projective ◽  
Smooth Projective Varieties

Let$X$be a smooth complex projective variety with basepoint$x$. We prove that every rigid integral irreducible representation$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}_{1}(X\!,x)\rightarrow \operatorname{SL}(3,\mathbb{C})$is of geometric origin, i.e., it comes from some family of smooth projective varieties. This partially generalizes an earlier result by Corlette and the second author in the rank 2 case and answers one of their questions.

scholarly journals Higher-dimensional Clifford–Severi equalities

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (08) ◽  
pp. 1950079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Ángel Barja ◽  
Rita Pardini ◽  
Lidia Stoppino
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Line Bundle ◽  
Abelian Variety ◽  
Projective Variety ◽  
Line Bundles ◽  
Smooth Complex ◽  
Higher Dimensional ◽  
Complex Projective Variety ◽  
Irregular Varieties ◽  
Complex Projective

Let [Formula: see text] be a smooth complex projective variety, [Formula: see text] a morphism to an abelian variety such that [Formula: see text] injects into [Formula: see text] and let [Formula: see text] be a line bundle on [Formula: see text]; denote by [Formula: see text] the minimum of [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text]. The so-called Clifford–Severi inequalities have been proven in [M. A. Barja, Generalized Clifford–Severi inequality and the volume of irregular varieties, Duke Math. J. 164(3) (2015) 541–568; M. A. Barja, R. Pardini and L. Stoppino, Linear systems on irregular varieties, J. Inst. Math. Jussieu (2019) 1–39; doi:10.1017/S1474748019000069]; in particular, for any [Formula: see text] there is a lower bound for the volume given by: [Formula: see text] and, if [Formula: see text] is pseudoeffective, [Formula: see text] In this paper, we characterize varieties and line bundles for which the above Clifford–Severi inequalities are equalities.

scholarly journals Derived algebraic geometry, determinants of perfect complexes, and applications to obstruction theories for maps and complexes

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (702) ◽  
pp. 1-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timo Schürg ◽  
Bertrand Toën ◽  
Gabriele Vezzosi
Keyword(s):  
Algebraic Geometry ◽  
Projective Variety ◽  
Obstruction Theory ◽  
Important Ingredient ◽  
Smooth Complex ◽  
Perfect Complexes ◽  
Derived Algebraic Geometry ◽  
Complex Projective Variety ◽  
Complex Projective

AbstractA quasi-smooth derived enhancement of a Deligne–Mumford stack 𝒳 naturally endows 𝒳 with a functorial perfect obstruction theory in the sense of Behrend–Fantechi. We apply this result to moduli of maps and perfect complexes on a smooth complex projective variety.ForWe give two further applications toAn important ingredient of our construction is a

Unramified Brauer group of the moduli spaces of PGLr(ℂ)-bundles over curves

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Indranil Biswas ◽  
Amit Hogadi ◽  
Yogish Holla
Keyword(s):  
Moduli Space ◽  
Moduli Spaces ◽  
Projective Variety ◽  
Brauer Group ◽  
Projective Curve ◽  
Connected Component ◽  
Smooth Complex ◽  
Complex Projective Variety ◽  
Complex Projective ◽  
Complex Projective Curve

AbstractLet X be an irreducible smooth complex projective curve of genus g, with g ≥ 2. Let N be a connected component of the moduli space of semistable principal PGLr (ℂ)-bundles over X; it is a normal unirational complex projective variety. We prove that the Brauer group of a desingularization of N is trivial.

scholarly journals PARABOLIC HIGGS BUNDLES AND -HIGGS BUNDLES

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
INDRANIL BISWAS ◽  
SOURADEEP MAJUMDER ◽  
MICHAEL LENNOX WONG
Keyword(s):  
Projective Variety ◽  
Higgs Bundles ◽  
Smooth Complex ◽  
Complex Projective Variety ◽  
Complex Projective

AbstractWe investigate parabolic Higgs bundles and $\Gamma $-Higgs bundles on a smooth complex projective variety.

scholarly journals Algebro-geometric version of Nevanlinna’s lemma on logarithmic derivative and applications

2004 ◽  
Vol 173 ◽  
pp. 23-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsutoshi Yamanoi
Keyword(s):  
Nevanlinna Theory ◽  
Affine Space ◽  
Projective Variety ◽  
Logarithmic Derivative ◽  
Second Main Theorem ◽  
Smooth Complex ◽  
Complex Projective Variety ◽  
Meromorphic Maps ◽  
Complex Projective ◽  
The Second Main Theorem

AbstractIn this paper we shall establish some generalization of Nevanlinna’s Lemma on Logarithmic Derivative to the case of meromorphic maps from a finite analytic covering space over the m-dimensional complex affine space ℂm to a smooth complex projective variety. Then we shall apply this to “the Second Main Theorem” in Nevanlinna theory in several complex variables.

scholarly journals From Sheaf Cohomology to the Algebraic de Rham Theorem

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fouad El Zein ◽  
Loring W. Tu
Keyword(s):  
Projective Variety ◽  
Differential Forms ◽  
Sheaf Cohomology ◽  
Coherent Sheaves ◽  
Smooth Complex ◽  
Complex Projective Variety ◽  
Singular Cohomology ◽  
De Rham ◽  
Cech Cohomology ◽  
Complex Projective

This chapter proves Grothendieck's algebraic de Rham theorem. It first proves Grothendieck's algebraic de Rham theorem more or less from scratch for a smooth complex projective variety X, namely, that there is an isomorphism H*(Xₐₙ,ℂ) ≃ H*X,Ω‎subscript alg superscript bullet) between the complex singular cohomology of Xan and the hypercohomology of the complex Ω‎subscript alg superscript bullet of sheaves of algebraic differential forms on X. The proof necessitates a discussion of sheaf cohomology, coherent sheaves, and hypercohomology. The chapter then develops more machinery, mainly the Čech cohomology of a sheaf and the Čech cohomology of a complex of sheaves, as tools for computing hypercohomology. The chapter thus proves that the general case of Grothendieck's theorem is equivalent to the affine case.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document