Considerations and rationale for the selection of LC-MS/MS or ligand binding assays for bioanalysis of therapeutic proteins

Author(s):  
Charles Scott Hottenstein ◽  
Eric Dobrzynski ◽  
Joshua Albert ◽  
Jonathan Kehler ◽  
Matthew Szapacs
2010 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 729-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad A. Ray ◽  
Lei Zhou ◽  
Jennifer Tsoi ◽  
Lennie Uy ◽  
Jessie Gu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichi Kamata ◽  
Kenji Mizutani ◽  
Katsuya Takahashi ◽  
Roberta Marchetti ◽  
Alba Silipo ◽  
...  

AbstractSeviL is a recently isolated lectin found to bind to the linear saccharides of the ganglioside GM1b (Neu5Ac$$\alpha$$ α (2-3)Gal$$\beta$$ β (1-3)GalNAc$$\beta$$ β (1-4)Gal$$\beta$$ β (1-4)Glc) and its precursor, asialo-GM1 (Gal$$\beta$$ β (1-3)GalNAc$$\beta$$ β (1-4)Gal$$\beta$$ β (1-4)Glc). The crystal structures of recombinant SeviL have been determined in the presence and absence of ligand. The protein belongs to the $$\beta$$ β -trefoil family, but shows only weak sequence similarity to known structures. SeviL forms a dimer in solution, with one binding site per subunit, close to the subunit interface. Molecular details of glycan recognition by SeviL in solution were analysed by ligand- and protein-based NMR techniques as well as ligand binding assays. SeviL shows no interaction with GM1 due to steric hindrance with the sialic acid branch that is absent from GM1b. This unusual specificity makes SeviL of great interest for the detection and control of certain cancer cells, and cells of the immune system, that display asialo-GM1.


Bioanalysis ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Duo ◽  
JoAnne Bruno ◽  
Steven Piccoli ◽  
Binodh DeSilva ◽  
Yan J Zhang

1984 ◽  
pp. 77-94
Author(s):  
Allan S. Manalan ◽  
Larry R. Jones ◽  
Henry R. Besch ◽  
August M. Watanabe

Author(s):  
Stacey A Jones ◽  
Derek J Parks ◽  
Steven A Kliewer

Author(s):  
Chiara D'Onofrio ◽  
Valeriia Zaremska ◽  
Jiao Zhu ◽  
Wolfgang Knoll ◽  
Paolo Pelosi

Bioanalysis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 273-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Barfield ◽  
Joanne Goodman ◽  
John Hood ◽  
Philip Timmerman

It is well accepted that chromatographic assay methods employ singlicate analysis for toxicokinetic and pharmacokinetic analysis. While conversely, it has been the norm for ligand-binding assays to be run in at least duplicate analyses, stemming mainly from concerns over inherent assay variability and reagent quality. Regulatory guidelines and guidance on bioanalytical method validation has, in the most part, recommended multiple replicates for immunoassays and this has led to the industry being comfortable and familiar with duplicate analysis. Over the last few years, the discussion on whether singlicate analysis is acceptable for ligand-binding assays has grown and the status quo is being challenged for regulated bioanalysis performed using immunoassays. Through interrogation of preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic assay data from the European Bioanalysis Forum community, the application of a singlicate analysis strategy has shown to have no impact on toxicokinetic and pharmacokinetic parameters when compared with duplicate analysis from the same studies. Therefore, now is the time to adopt a new mindset when it comes to sample analysis for toxicokinetic and pharmacokinetic ligand-binding assays and embrace singlicate analysis in the regulated environment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 92 (23) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanqin Ren ◽  
Maria Korom ◽  
Ronald Truong ◽  
Dora Chan ◽  
Szu-Han Huang ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTEfforts to cure human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are obstructed by reservoirs of latently infected CD4+T cells that can reestablish viremia. HIV-specific broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs), defined by unusually wide neutralization breadths against globally diverse viruses, may contribute to the elimination of these reservoirs by binding to reactivated cells, thus targeting them for immune clearance. However, the relationship between neutralization of reservoir isolates and binding to corresponding infected primary CD4+T cells has not been determined. Thus, the extent to which neutralization breadths and potencies can be used to infer the corresponding parameters of infected cell binding is currently unknown. We assessed the breadths and potencies of bNAbs against 36 viruses reactivated from peripheral blood CD4+T cells from antiretroviral (ARV)-treated HIV-infected individuals by using paired neutralization and infected cell binding assays. Single-antibody breadths ranged from 0 to 64% for neutralization (80% inhibitory concentration [IC80] of ≤10 μg/ml) and from 0 to 89% for binding, with two-antibody combinations (results for antibody combinations are theoretical/predicted) reaching levels of 0 to 83% and 50 to 100%, respectively. Infected cell binding correlated with virus neutralization for 10 of 14 antibodies (e.g., for 3BNC117,r = 0.82 andP < 0.0001). Heterogeneity was observed, however, with a lack of significant correlation for 2G12, CAP256.VRC26.25, 2F5, and 4E10. Our results provide guidance on the selection of bNAbs for interventional cure studies, both by providing a direct assessment of intra- and interindividual variabilities in neutralization and infected cell binding in a novel cohort and by defining the relationships between these parameters for a panel of bNAbs.IMPORTANCEAlthough antiretroviral therapies have improved the lives of people who are living with HIV, they do not cure infection. Efforts are being directed towards harnessing the immune system to eliminate the virus that persists, potentially resulting in virus-free remission without medication. HIV-specific antibodies hold promise for such therapies owing to their ability to both prevent the infection of new cells (neutralization) and direct the killing of infected cells. We isolated 36 HIV strains from individuals whose virus was suppressed by medication and tested 14 different antibodies for neutralization of these viruses and for binding to cells infected with the same viruses (critical for engaging natural killer cells). For both neutralization and infected cell binding, we observed variation both between individuals and amongst different viruses within an individual. For most antibodies, neutralization activity correlated with infected cell binding. These data provide guidance on the selection of antibodies for clinical trials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document