33. AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE BLOCK DESIGN ROTATION EFFECT An Analysis of a Psychological Effect of Brain Damage

1958 ◽  
pp. 519-526
1969 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 695-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Canter ◽  
John J. Straumanis

The standard Bender test and its repetition on Canter's BIP paper along with the WAIS Vocabulary and Block Designs were administered to 16 senile and 17 healthy elderly Ss. The defects of the senile Ss were clearly revealed by the tests but the conventional use of Bender error scores and the discrepancy between Vocabulary and Block Design scores would also identify at least a fourth of the healthy elderly as having mild to moderate deficit consistent with organic brain damage. On the other hand, the BIP reflected the normal perceptuomotor performance of the healthy Ss while retaining sensitivity to the degree of organicity of the senile Ss.


1953 ◽  
Vol 99 (416) ◽  
pp. 394-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. B. Shapiro

This is the third of a series of articles reporting an investigation of the block design rotation effect. This effect is shown by some patients when they are doing the Kohs' Blocks Test, which is known in other forms as the Block Design Test. In this test the subject has to reproduce patterns with the aid of diversely coloured one-inch cubes. It was observed that some patients, while they reproduced these patterns correctly, left their blocks in an obviously rotated position, apparently with no idea that anything was amiss (see Illus tration i). Such rotation can often be as great as 45°.


2000 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy M. Schatz ◽  
Angela O. Ballantyne ◽  
Doris A. Trauner

1965 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 306-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. B. Shapiro ◽  
H. R. Beech
Keyword(s):  

1958 ◽  
Vol 104 (436) ◽  
pp. 792-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. B. Shapiro ◽  
Barbara Tizard

The experiment to be reported in this paper stems from previous work on the block design rotation effect (Shapiro, 2, 3, 4; Yates, 9, 10; Williams, Lubin et al., 7). As is well known, the block design test in its various forms: Kohs, Wechsler and Goldstein Scheerer, requires the subject to reproduce, with one-inch multi-coloured cubes, a series of abstract designs. It has been reported by a number of observers that subjects sometimes leave their reproductions in a rotated position, although otherwise the designs have been correctly reproduced.


Author(s):  
Stefan Frisch ◽  
Alexandre Métraux

ABSTRACT Neurologist and psychiatrist Kurt Goldstein (1878-1965) made substantial contributions to neuropsychology in general and to the development of tests for the assessment of brain damage sequelae in particular. Unlike present-day neuropsychology’s psychometric orientation, Goldstein kept a critical distance to a mere quantitative evaluation. Eighty years ago, he impressively demonstrated his own, qualitatively oriented diagnostic approach both in a remarkable monograph and in a didactic film, in collaboration with psychologist Martin Scheerer (1900-1961). By modifying a classical paradigm for the assessment of deficits in visuospatial construction, the Block Design Test, the two authors developed the Goldstein-Scheerer Cube Test. This version characterizes itself by offering the patient different types of cues in order to reveal the nature of the deficit at stake. The test remains an impressive illustration of Goldstein’s most famous neuropsychological concept, viz. the human ability to abstract from a concrete situation: the abstract (or categorial) attitude.


1964 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. D. John

The performance of 10 normal Ss on a modification of Shapiro's (1952) Block Design Rotation Test has been assessed using two measures: (1) angular size of errors of orientation of the reproduced designs (error scores), and (2) amount of rotation of reproduced designs, i.e., taking into account both angular size and direction of errors of orientation (rotation scores). The results show that these two measures are differentially affected by the experimental variables operating in this situation and that what has been called the “block design rotation effect” does not reflect a tendency by Ss to rotate their reproductions in a particular direction. A supplementary hypothesis that the so-called block design rotation effect is related to the Poggendorf illusion was not supported by the findings.


1954 ◽  
Vol 100 (421) ◽  
pp. 975-979 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Yates

This is the fourth of a series of articles reporting an investigation into the Block Design Rotation Effect. This effect was first observed in some patients while they were doing the Goldstein Block Design Test, in which the subject has to reproduce patterns with the aid of coloured cubes. Some patients, while completing the designs correctly, would leave the completed pattern in a rotated position without apparently being aware of this (2). Such rotation frequently reached 45° (Illustration 1) but rarely exceeded this amount.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document